Literature DB >> 25855897

A Multicenter Evaluation of Off-Label Medication Use and Associated Adverse Drug Reactions in Adult Medical ICUs.

Pamela L Smithburger1, Mitchell S Buckley, Mark A Culver, Sarah Sokol, Ishaq Lat, Steven M Handler, Levent Kirisci, Sandra L Kane-Gill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prior research indicates that off-label use is common in the ICU; however, the safety of off-label use has not been assessed. The study objective was to determine the prevalence of adverse drug reactions associated with off-label use and evaluate off-label use as a risk factor for the development of adverse drug reactions in an adult ICU population.
DESIGN: Multicenter, observational study
SETTING: : Medical ICUs at three academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 yr old) receiving medication therapy.
INTERVENTIONS: All administered medications were evaluated for Food and Drug Administration-approved or off-label use. Patients were assessed daily for the development of an adverse drug reaction through active surveillance. Three adverse drug reaction assessment instruments were used to determine the probability of an adverse drug reaction resulting from drug therapy. Severity and harm of the adverse drug reaction were also assessed. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify a set of covariates that influenced the rate of adverse drug reactions.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 1,654 patient-days (327 patients) and 16,391 medications were evaluated, with 43% of medications being used off-label. One hundred and sixteen adverse drug reactions were categorized dichotomously (Food and Drug Administration or off-label), with 56% and 44% being associated with Food and Drug Administration-approved and off-label use, respectively. The number of adverse drug reactions for medications administered and the number of harmful and severe adverse drug reactions did not differ for medications used for Food and Drug Administration-approved or off-label use (0.74% vs 0.67%; p = 0.336; 33 vs 31 events, p = 0.567; 24 vs 24 events, p = 0.276). Age, sex, number of high-risk medications, number of off-label medications, and severity of illness score were included in the Cox proportional hazard regression. It was found that the rate of adverse drug reactions increases by 8% for every one additional off-label medication (hazard ratio = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.018-1.154).
CONCLUSION: Although adverse drug reactions do not occur more frequently with off-label use, adverse drug reaction risk increases with each additional off-label medication used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25855897      PMCID: PMC4868132          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  46 in total

1.  [Off-label prescriptions in an adult surgical intensive care unit].

Authors:  P Albaladejo; B Caillet; P Moine; B Vigué; A Decorps-Declère; D Benhamou
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 1.228

2.  Off-label use of drugs in Italy: a prospective, observational and multicentre study.

Authors:  C Pandolfini; P Impicciatore; D Provasi; F Rocchi; R Campi; M Bonati
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  Legal considerations in off-label medication prescribing.

Authors:  Richard S Blum
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Aug 12-26

Review 4.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Definition of events associated with drugs: regulatory perspectives.

Authors:  J K Jones
Journal:  J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1988-10

6.  An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I. Background, description, and instructions for use.

Authors:  M S Kramer; J M Leventhal; T A Hutchinson; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; U Busto; E M Sellers; P Sandor; I Ruiz; E A Roberts; E Janecek; C Domecq; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Unlicensed and off-label medication use in a neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  Joseph Barr; Galit Brenner-Zada; Eli Heiman; Gideon Pareth; Mordechai Bulkowstein; Revital Greenberg; Matitiahu Berkovitch
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Stroke prevention in women: synopsis of the 2014 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline.

Authors:  Cheryl Bushnell; Louise McCullough
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dexmedetomidine, agitated delirium, and "off-label" drugs.

Authors:  Genís Carrasco; Nacho Baeza; Lluís Cabré
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Innovation and safety in critical care: should we collaborate with the industry? Con.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Jon Henrik Laake; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Categorization and association analysis of risk factors for adverse drug events.

Authors:  Lina Zhou; Anamika Paul Rupa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Off-Label Medication Use in the Inpatient Palliative Care Unit.

Authors:  Jung Hye Kwon; Min Ji Kim; Sebastian Bruera; Minjeong Park; Eduardo Bruera; David Hui
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of the Role of the Clinical Pharmacist and Expanded Pharmacist Coverage in Critical Care.

Authors:  Kristin Kaupp; Emma K Reid; Hannah Corney; Sarah Burgess; Lauren Hutton
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2022

6.  Trigger tools are as effective as non-targeted chart review for adverse drug event detection in intensive care units.

Authors:  Renato R Martins; Lunara T Silva; Gabriela G Bessa; Flavio M Lopes
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Clinical pharmacist assessment of drug-related problems among intensive care unit patients in a Turkish university hospital.

Authors:  Aslınur Albayrak; Bilgen Başgut; Gülbin Aygencel Bıkmaz; Bensu Karahalil
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  A retrospective study of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in critically ill patients in the ICU.

Authors:  Răzvan Bologheanu; Paul Lichtenegger; Mathias Maleczek; Daniel Laxar; Eva Schaden; Oliver Kimberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.