Literature DB >> 25855784

Addressing the social determinants of inequities in physical activity and sedentary behaviours.

Kylie Ball1, Alison Carver2, Katherine Downing2, Michelle Jackson2, Kerryn O'Rourke3.   

Abstract

Participation in both physical activity and sedentary behaviours follow a social gradient, such that those who are more advantaged are more likely to be regularly physically active, less likely to be sedentary, and less likely to experience the adverse health outcomes associated with inactive lifestyles than their less advantaged peers. The aim of this paper is to provide, in a format that will support policymakers and practitioners, an overview of the current evidence base and highlight promising approaches for promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviours equitably at each level of 'Fair Foundations: The VicHealth framework for health equity'. A rapid review was undertaken in February-April 2014. Electronic databases (Medline, PsychINFO, SportsDISCUS, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Global Health and Embase) were searched using a pre-defined search strategy and grey literature searches of websites of key relevant organizations were undertaken. The majority of included studies focussed on approaches targeting behaviour change at the individual level, with fewer focussing on daily living conditions or broader socioeconomic, political and cultural contexts. While many gaps in the evidence base remain, particularly in relation to reducing sedentary behaviour, promising approaches for promoting physical activity equitably across the three levels of the Fair Foundations framework include: community-wide approaches; support for local and state governments to develop policies and practices; neighbourhood designs (including parks) that are conducive to physical activity; investment in early childhood interventions; school programmes; peer- or group-based programmes; and targeted motivational, cognitive-behavioural, and/or mediated individual-level approaches.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  active living; inequalities in health; physical activities; sedentary behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25855784     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dav022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  30 in total

Review 1.  Dance for Health: An Intergenerational Program to Increase Access to Physical Activity.

Authors:  Krista Schroeder; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Adriana Perez; David Earley; Cory Bowman; Terri H Lipman
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Health Is Power: Active Transportation, Physical Activity, and Cardiometabolic Health Among Ethnic Minority Women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lorenzo; Jacob Szeszulski; Michael Todd; Scherezade K Mama; Rebecca E Lee
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-03-01

3.  Promoting physical activity in a low-income neighborhood of the Paris suburb of Saint-Denis: effects of a community-based intervention to increase physical activity.

Authors:  Camille Buscail; Mehdi Menai; Benoît Salanave; Paul Daval; Marjorie Painsecq; Pierre Lombrail; Serge Hercberg; Chantal Julia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  A cluster-randomised controlled trial to promote physical activity in adolescents: the Raising Awareness of Physical Activity (RAW-PA) Study.

Authors:  Nicola D Ridgers; Anna Timperio; Helen Brown; Kylie Ball; Susie Macfarlane; Samuel K Lai; Kara Richards; Winsfred Ngan; Jo Salmon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Evaluating the impact of a walking program in a disadvantaged area: using the RE-AIM framework by mixed methods.

Authors:  Camila Tiome Baba; Isabela Martins Oliveira; Adriele Evelyn Ferreira Silva; Leonardo Moreira Vieira; Natalia Caroline Cerri; Alex Antonio Florindo; Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Traversing myths and mountains: addressing socioeconomic inequities in the promotion of nutrition and physical activity behaviours.

Authors:  Kylie Ball
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Why are some groups physically active and others not? A contrast group analysis in leisure settings.

Authors:  Ansgar Thiel; Hendrik K Thedinga; Harald Barkhoff; Katrin Giel; Olesia Schweizer; Syra Thiel; Stephan Zipfel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Interventions to improve physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Melinda Craike; Glen Wiesner; Toni A Hilland; Enrique Garcia Bengoechea
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Does Physically Demanding Work Hinder a Physically Active Lifestyle in Low Socioeconomic Workers? A Compositional Data Analysis Based on Accelerometer Data.

Authors:  Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Javier Palarea-Albaladejo; Adrian Bauman; Nidhi Gupta; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Equity effects of children's physical activity interventions: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca E Love; Jean Adams; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.