Jing Li1, Justin S White2, Teh-Wei Hu1, Geoffrey T Fong3, Jiang Yuan4. 1. School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. 2. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 4. Office of Tobacco Control, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: China has long kept its tobacco taxes below international standards. The Chinese government has cited two rationales against raising tobacco tax, namely, the unfair burden it places on low-income smokers and the ability of consumers to switch to cheaper brands. OBJECTIVE: This study examines how different socioeconomic subgroups of Chinese smokers switch brands in response to cigarette price changes. METHODS: We model smokers' choice of cigarette tier as a function of tier-specific prices. We examine heterogeneous responses to prices by estimating mixed logit models for different income and education subgroups that allow for random variation in smokers' preferences. We use data from three waves of the longitudinal International Tobacco Control China Survey, collected in six large Chinese cities between 2006 and 2009. FINDINGS: Low-income and less educated smokers are considerably more likely to switch tiers (including both up-trading and down-trading) than are their high-socioeconomic status (SES) counterparts. For those in the second-to-lowest tier, a ¥1 ($0.16, or roughly 25%) rise in prices increases the likelihood of switching tiers by 5.6% points for low-income smokers and 7.2% points for less educated smokers, compared to 1.6% and 3.0% points for the corresponding high-SES groups. Low-income and less educated groups are also more likely to trade down compared to their high-SES counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small percentage of low-income and less educated Chinese smokers switched to cheaper brands in response to price increases. Hence, the concern of the Chinese government that a cigarette tax increase will lead to large-scale brand switching is not supported by this study. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: China has long kept its tobacco taxes below international standards. The Chinese government has cited two rationales against raising tobacco tax, namely, the unfair burden it places on low-income smokers and the ability of consumers to switch to cheaper brands. OBJECTIVE: This study examines how different socioeconomic subgroups of Chinese smokers switch brands in response to cigarette price changes. METHODS: We model smokers' choice of cigarette tier as a function of tier-specific prices. We examine heterogeneous responses to prices by estimating mixed logit models for different income and education subgroups that allow for random variation in smokers' preferences. We use data from three waves of the longitudinal International Tobacco Control China Survey, collected in six large Chinese cities between 2006 and 2009. FINDINGS: Low-income and less educated smokers are considerably more likely to switch tiers (including both up-trading and down-trading) than are their high-socioeconomic status (SES) counterparts. For those in the second-to-lowest tier, a ¥1 ($0.16, or roughly 25%) rise in prices increases the likelihood of switching tiers by 5.6% points for low-income smokers and 7.2% points for less educated smokers, compared to 1.6% and 3.0% points for the corresponding high-SES groups. Low-income and less educated groups are also more likely to trade down compared to their high-SES counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small percentage of low-income and less educated Chinese smokers switched to cheaper brands in response to price increases. Hence, the concern of the Chinese government that a cigarette tax increase will lead to large-scale brand switching is not supported by this study. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Low/Middle income country; Price; Socioeconomic status; Taxation
Authors: Matthew C Farrelly; Frank J Chaloupka; Carla J Berg; Sherry L Emery; Lisa Henriksen; Pamela Ling; Scott J Leischow; Douglas A Luke; Michelle C Kegler; Shu-Hong Zhu; Elizabeth M Ginexi Journal: J Addict Behav Ther Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Yu Wang; Zongshuan Duan; Scott R Weaver; Lucy Popova; Claire A Spears; David L Ashley; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen; Jidong Huang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Wanting Wen; Zhu Zhang; Ziqiang Li; Jiaqi Liang; Yongcheng Zhan; Daniel D Zeng; Scott J Leischow Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Yafei Si; Zhongliang Zhou; Min Su; Xiao Wang; Dan Li; Dan Wang; Shuyi He; Zihan Hong; Xi Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 3.390