BACKGROUND: In recent years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was recognized as an important factor in chronic kidney disease (CKD) pathogenesis. The concentrations of serum aminotransferases in both chronic dialysis and chronic renal failure (CRF) patients most commonly fall within the lower end of the range of normal values. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of four liver tests and four biological scores in detection of NAFLD in comparison with transient elastography (TE) findings in different groups of patients. METHODS: The study was cross-sectional analysis collected data from a single tertiary care center. Of 202 patents there were 52 patients with CKD, 50 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated with haemodialysis (HD), 50 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and 50 patients with proven coronary heart disease (CHD). Fifty sex- and age-matched individuals without NAFLD and with normal liver and kidney function tests served as controls. With the help of TE (FibroScan®, Echosense SA, Paris, France), liver stiffness was selected as the parameter to quantify liver fibrosis and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) was used to detect and quantify liver steatosis. RESULTS: According to the CAP findings 76.9 %CKD patients, 82 %HD patients, 74 %RTRs and 69.1 % CHD patients had CAP > 238 dB.m(-1) and thus by definition NAFLD. We have found that ALT, AST and GGT levels were positively correlated with CAP values while ALT and AST showed positive correlation with liver stiffness acquired with TE only in CHD patients. According to TE findings APRI (AUC 0.796) and FIB-4 (AUC 0.790) scores were correlated with the presence of fibrosis, while HIS score was correlated with the presence of steatosis (AUC 0.867) only in CHD patients. CONCLUSION: Liver tests and biological scores are not useful for NAFLD detection in CRF patients. TE with CAP provides the opportunity of noninvasive screening for NAFLD as well as liver fibrosis in patients with CRF.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was recognized as an important factor in chronic kidney disease (CKD) pathogenesis. The concentrations of serum aminotransferases in both chronic dialysis and chronic renal failure (CRF) patients most commonly fall within the lower end of the range of normal values. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of four liver tests and four biological scores in detection of NAFLD in comparison with transient elastography (TE) findings in different groups of patients. METHODS: The study was cross-sectional analysis collected data from a single tertiary care center. Of 202 patents there were 52 patients with CKD, 50 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated with haemodialysis (HD), 50 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and 50 patients with proven coronary heart disease (CHD). Fifty sex- and age-matched individuals without NAFLD and with normal liver and kidney function tests served as controls. With the help of TE (FibroScan®, Echosense SA, Paris, France), liver stiffness was selected as the parameter to quantify liver fibrosis and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) was used to detect and quantify liver steatosis. RESULTS: According to the CAP findings 76.9 %CKDpatients, 82 %HDpatients, 74 %RTRs and 69.1 % CHD patients had CAP > 238 dB.m(-1) and thus by definition NAFLD. We have found that ALT, AST and GGT levels were positively correlated with CAP values while ALT and AST showed positive correlation with liver stiffness acquired with TE only in CHD patients. According to TE findings APRI (AUC 0.796) and FIB-4 (AUC 0.790) scores were correlated with the presence of fibrosis, while HIS score was correlated with the presence of steatosis (AUC 0.867) only in CHD patients. CONCLUSION: Liver tests and biological scores are not useful for NAFLD detection in CRF patients. TE with CAP provides the opportunity of noninvasive screening for NAFLD as well as liver fibrosis in patients with CRF.
Authors: Thomas Karlas; David Petroff; Nikita Garnov; Stephan Böhm; Hannelore Tenckhoff; Christian Wittekind; Manfred Wiese; Ingolf Schiefke; Nicolas Linder; Alexander Schaudinn; Harald Busse; Thomas Kahn; Joachim Mössner; Thomas Berg; Michael Tröltzsch; Volker Keim; Johannes Wiegand Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giovanni Musso; Roberto Gambino; James H Tabibian; Mattias Ekstedt; Stergios Kechagias; Masahide Hamaguchi; Rolf Hultcrantz; Hannes Hagström; Seung Kew Yoon; Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Jacob George; Francisco Barrera; Svanhildur Hafliðadóttir; Einar Stefan Björnsson; Matthew J Armstrong; Laurence J Hopkins; Xin Gao; Sven Francque; An Verrijken; Yusuf Yilmaz; Keith D Lindor; Michael Charlton; Robin Haring; Markus M Lerch; Rainer Rettig; Henry Völzke; Seungho Ryu; Guolin Li; Linda L Wong; Mariana Machado; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Kohichiroh Yasui; Maurizio Cassader Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 11.069