BACKGROUND: Relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain (RapSP-LS) was suggested in advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA). It is unclear whether it is present in less advanced CA. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with presumptive diagnosis of CA and mean left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) ≤14 mm were recruited. Apart from RapSP-LS visually identified, relative apical longitudinal strain index (RapLSI) was defined as [average apical LS/(average basal LS+average mid-ventricle LS)]. Among 119 patients included, 47 were finally diagnosed with CA. RapLSI was higher in the CA group compared to other causes of increased mean LVWT (P<0.001), but with a significant range of overlap noted. In contrast, RapSP-LS visually assessed was noted in most CA patients (31/47, 66.0%) except in those with preserved LV ejection fraction, normal LVWT, and mildly decreased global LS, suggesting least advanced CA. On multivariate analysis of the added diagnostic role of RapSP-LS or RapLSI on top of clinical, electrocardiographic, and conventional echocardiographic parameters, addition of RapLSI produced only borderline increase in area under the curve of the multivariate model (P=0.05), whereas addition of RapSP-LS significantly increased it (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Visual identification of RapSP-LS is useful in terms of added diagnostic value compared with quantitative calculation of RapLSI. Its clinical application, however, should be used with caution in patients with less advanced CA.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain (RapSP-LS) was suggested in advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA). It is unclear whether it is present in less advanced CA. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with presumptive diagnosis of CA and mean left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) ≤14 mm were recruited. Apart from RapSP-LS visually identified, relative apical longitudinal strain index (RapLSI) was defined as [average apical LS/(average basal LS+average mid-ventricle LS)]. Among 119 patients included, 47 were finally diagnosed with CA. RapLSI was higher in the CA group compared to other causes of increased mean LVWT (P<0.001), but with a significant range of overlap noted. In contrast, RapSP-LS visually assessed was noted in most CA patients (31/47, 66.0%) except in those with preserved LV ejection fraction, normal LVWT, and mildly decreased global LS, suggesting least advanced CA. On multivariate analysis of the added diagnostic role of RapSP-LS or RapLSI on top of clinical, electrocardiographic, and conventional echocardiographic parameters, addition of RapLSI produced only borderline increase in area under the curve of the multivariate model (P=0.05), whereas addition of RapSP-LS significantly increased it (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Visual identification of RapSP-LS is useful in terms of added diagnostic value compared with quantitative calculation of RapLSI. Its clinical application, however, should be used with caution in patients with less advanced CA.
Authors: Vera V Ferreira; Sílvia A Rosa; Tiago Pereira-da-Silva; Inês Rodrigues; António V Gonçalves; Tiago Mendonça; Alexandra Castelo; Luísa M Branco; Ana Galrinho; António Fiarresga; Ruben Ramos; Lino Patrício; Duarte Cacela; Rui C Ferreira Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2021-06-15
Authors: Diana Bonderman; Gerhard Pölzl; Klemens Ablasser; Hermine Agis; Stefan Aschauer; Michaela Auer-Grumbach; Christina Binder; Jakob Dörler; Franz Duca; Christian Ebner; Marcus Hacker; Renate Kain; Andreas Kammerlander; Matthias Koschutnik; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Agnes Mayr; Christian Nitsche; Peter P Rainer; Susanne Reiter-Malmqvist; Matthias Schneider; Roland Schwarz; Nicolas Verheyen; Thomas Weber; Marc Michael Zaruba; Roza Badr Eslam; Martin Hülsmann; Julia Mascherbauer Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 1.704