PURPOSE: To determine inter-rater reliability of sarcoidosis-related computed tomography (CT) findings that can be used for scoring of thoracic sarcoidosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 51 patients with sarcoidosis were scored by five chest radiologists for various abnormal CT findings (22 in total) encountered in thoracic sarcoidosis. Using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, inter-rater reliability was analysed and reported according to the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) criteria. A pre-specified sub-analysis was performed to investigate the effect of training. Scoring was trained in a distinct set of 15 scans in which all abnormal CT findings were represented. RESULTS: Median age of the 51 patients (36 men, 70%) was 43 years (range 26 - 64 years). All radiographic stages were present in this group. ICC ranged from 0.91 for honeycombing to 0.11 for nodular margin (sharp versus ill-defined). The ICC was above 0.60 in 13 of the 22 abnormal findings. Sub-analysis for the best-trained observers demonstrated an ICC improvement for all abnormal findings and values above 0.60 for 16 of the 22 abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, reliability between raters was acceptable for 16 thoracic sarcoidosis-related abnormal CT findings. KEY POINTS: • Thoracic sarcoidosis is common; knowledge on reliability of CT scoring is limited. • Scoring CT abnormalities in pulmonary sarcoidosis can achieve good inter-rater agreement. • CT scoring validation in thoracic sarcoidosis is important for diagnostic and prognostic studies.
PURPOSE: To determine inter-rater reliability of sarcoidosis-related computed tomography (CT) findings that can be used for scoring of thoracic sarcoidosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 51 patients with sarcoidosis were scored by five chest radiologists for various abnormal CT findings (22 in total) encountered in thoracic sarcoidosis. Using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, inter-rater reliability was analysed and reported according to the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) criteria. A pre-specified sub-analysis was performed to investigate the effect of training. Scoring was trained in a distinct set of 15 scans in which all abnormal CT findings were represented. RESULTS: Median age of the 51 patients (36 men, 70%) was 43 years (range 26 - 64 years). All radiographic stages were present in this group. ICC ranged from 0.91 for honeycombing to 0.11 for nodular margin (sharp versus ill-defined). The ICC was above 0.60 in 13 of the 22 abnormal findings. Sub-analysis for the best-trained observers demonstrated an ICC improvement for all abnormal findings and values above 0.60 for 16 of the 22 abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, reliability between raters was acceptable for 16 thoracic sarcoidosis-related abnormal CT findings. KEY POINTS: • Thoracic sarcoidosis is common; knowledge on reliability of CT scoring is limited. • Scoring CT abnormalities in pulmonary sarcoidosis can achieve good inter-rater agreement. • CT scoring validation in thoracic sarcoidosis is important for diagnostic and prognostic studies.
Authors: C J Zappala; S R Desai; S J Copley; R Spagnolo; D Cramer; D Sen; S M Alam; R M du Bois; D M Hansell; A U Wells Journal: Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 0.670
Authors: Eva Criado; Marcelo Sánchez; José Ramírez; Pedro Arguis; Teresa M de Caralt; Rosario J Perea; Antonio Xaubet Journal: Radiographics Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Christopher J Zappala; Sujal R Desai; Susan J Copley; Paolo Spagnolo; Dushendree Sen; Salma M Alam; Roland M du Bois; David M Hansell; Athol U Wells Journal: Chest Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: M F Muers; W G Middleton; G J Gibson; R J Prescott; D N Mitchell; C K Connolly; B D Harrison Journal: Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 0.670
Authors: C J Bergin; D Y Bell; C L Coblentz; C Chiles; G Gamsu; N R MacIntyre; R E Coleman; C E Putman Journal: Radiology Date: 1989-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sarah M Ryan; Tasha E Fingerlin; Margaret Mroz; Briana Barkes; Nabeel Hamzeh; Lisa A Maier; Nichole E Carlson Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 16.671