Literature DB >> 25853914

Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Well-Trained Men.

Brad J Schoenfeld1, Mark D Peterson, Dan Ogborn, Bret Contreras, Gul T Sonmez.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of low- versus high-load resistance training (RT) on muscular adaptations in well-trained subjects. Eighteen young men experienced in RT were matched according to baseline strength and then randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups: a low-load RT routine (LL) where 25-35 repetitions were performed per set per exercise (n = 9) or a high-load RT routine (HL) where 8-12 repetitions were performed per set per exercise (n = 9). During each session, subjects in both groups performed 3 sets of 7 different exercises representing all major muscles. Training was performed 3 times per week on nonconsecutive days, for a total of 8 weeks. Both HL and LL conditions produced significant increases in thickness of the elbow flexors (5.3 vs. 8.6%, respectively), elbow extensors (6.0 vs. 5.2%, respectively), and quadriceps femoris (9.3 vs. 9.5%, respectively), with no significant differences noted between groups. Improvements in back squat strength were significantly greater for HL compared with LL (19.6 vs. 8.8%, respectively), and there was a trend for greater increases in 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press (6.5 vs. 2.0%, respectively). Upper body muscle endurance (assessed by the bench press at 50% 1RM to failure) improved to a greater extent in LL compared with HL (16.6 vs. -1.2%, respectively). These findings indicate that both HL and LL training to failure can elicit significant increases in muscle hypertrophy among well-trained young men; however, HL training is superior for maximizing strength adaptations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25853914     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  74 in total

Review 1.  Intramuscular Anabolic Signaling and Endocrine Response Following Resistance Exercise: Implications for Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Jay R Hoffman; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Darryn S Willoughby
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Muscle activation during three sets to failure at 80 vs. 30% 1RM resistance exercise.

Authors:  Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Terry J Housh; Haley C Bergstrom; Kristen C Cochrane; Ethan C Hill; Cory M Smith; Glen O Johnson; Richard J Schmidt; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld; Dan Ogborn; James W Krieger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Chronic Effects of Altering Resistance Training Set Configurations Using Cluster Sets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy B Davies; Derek L Tran; Clorinda M Hogan; G Gregory Haff; Christopher Latella
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Adaptations to Endurance and Strength Training.

Authors:  David C Hughes; Stian Ellefsen; Keith Baar
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 6.  Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tyler D Williams; Danilo V Tolusso; Michael V Fedewa; Michael R Esco
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Effects of 4 weeks of low-load unilateral resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on strength, thickness, V wave, and H reflex of the soleus muscle in men.

Authors:  David Colomer-Poveda; Salvador Romero-Arenas; Antonio Vera-Ibáñez; Manuel Viñuela-García; Gonzalo Márquez
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Trained females exhibit less fatigability than trained males after a heavy knee extensor resistance exercise session.

Authors:  Emily Metcalf; Amanda D Hagstrom; Paul W Marshall
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Resistance training induced changes in strength and specific force at the fiber and whole muscle level: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Minsoo Kang; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Differential Effects of Heavy Versus Moderate Loads on Measures of Strength and Hypertrophy in Resistance-Trained Men.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld; Bret Contreras; Andrew D Vigotsky; Mark Peterson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.