Literature DB >> 25853734

Peptides for specifically targeting nanoparticles to cellular organelles: quo vadis?

Lauren D Field1,2, James B Delehanty1, YungChia Chen1,3, Igor L Medintz1.   

Abstract

The interfacing of nanomaterials and especially nanoparticles within all aspects of biological research continues to grow at a nearly unabated pace with projected applications focusing on powerful new tools for cellular labeling, imaging, and sensing, theranostic materials, and drug delivery. At the most fundamental level, many of these nanoparticles are meant to target not only very specific cell-types, regardless of whether they are in a culture, tissue, an animal model, or ultimately a patient, but also in many cases a specific subcellular organelle. During this process, these materials will undergo a complex journey that must first find the target cell of interest, then be taken up by those cells across the extracellular membrane, and ultimately localize to a desired subcellular organelle, which may include the nucleus, plasma membrane, endolysosomal system, mitochondria, cytosol, or endoplasmic reticulum. To accomplish these complex tasks in the correct sequence, researchers are increasingly interested in selecting for and exploiting targeting peptides that can impart the requisite capabilities to a given nanoparticle construct. There are also a number of related criteria that need careful consideration for this undertaking centering on the nature and properties of the peptide vector itself, the peptide-nanoparticle conjugate characteristics, and the target cell. Here, we highlight some important issues and key research areas related to this burgeoning field. We begin by providing a brief overview of some criteria for optimal attachment of peptides to nanoparticles, the predominant methods by which nanoparticles enter cells, and some of the peptide sequences that have been utilized to facilitate nanoparticle delivery to cells focusing on those that engender the initial targeting and uptake. Because almost all materials delivered to cells by peptides utilize the endosomal system of vesicular transport and in many cases remain sequestered within the vesicles, we critically evaluate the issue of endosomal escape in the context of some recently reported successes in this regard. Following from this, peptides that have been reported to deliver nanoparticles to specific subcellular compartments are examined with a focus on what they delivered and the putative mechanisms by which they were able to accomplish this. The last section focuses on two areas that are critical to realizing this overall approach in the long term. The first is how to select for peptidyl sequences capable of improved or more specific cellular or subcellular targeting based upon principles commonly associated with drug discovery. The second looks at what has been done to create modular peptides that incorporate multiple desirable functionalities within a single, contiguous sequence. This provides a viable alternative to either the almost insurmountable challenge of finding one sequence capable of all functions or, alternatively, attaching different peptides with different functionalities to the same nanoparticle in different ratios when trying to orchestrate their net effects. Finally, we conclude with a brief perspective on the future evolution and broader impact of this growing area of bionanoscience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25853734     DOI: 10.1021/ar500449v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  28 in total

Review 1.  Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery.

Authors:  Piotr S Kowalski; Arnab Rudra; Lei Miao; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Jinmyoung Joo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Biomolecular engineering for nanobio/bionanotechnology.

Authors:  Teruyuki Nagamune
Journal:  Nano Converg       Date:  2017-04-24

Review 4.  Nanocaged platforms: modification, drug delivery and nanotoxicity. Opening synthetic cages to release the tiger.

Authors:  Mahdi Karimi; Parham Sahandi Zangabad; Fatemeh Mehdizadeh; Hedieh Malekzad; Alireza Ghasemi; Sajad Bahrami; Hossein Zare; Mohsen Moghoofei; Amin Hekmatmanesh; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 5.  Peptide-based imaging agents for cancer detection.

Authors:  Xiaolian Sun; Yesen Li; Ting Liu; Zijing Li; Xianzhong Zhang; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Development of nanomaterials for bone-targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Hao Cheng; Aditya Chawla; Yafeng Yang; Yuxiao Li; Jin Zhang; Hae Lin Jang; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 7.  Quantum Dot-Dye Conjugates for Biosensing, Imaging, and Therapy.

Authors:  Sungwook Jung; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 8.  Fluorescent probes for organelle-targeted bioactive species imaging.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Wei Pan; Na Li; Bo Tang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 9.  Peptide and protein nanoparticle conjugates: versatile platforms for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Christopher D Spicer; Coline Jumeaux; Bakul Gupta; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 54.564

10.  TMTP1-Modified, Tumor Microenvironment Responsive Nanoparticles Co-Deliver Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Prodrugs for Effective Cervical Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Guiying Jiang; Xueqian Wang; Ying Zhou; Chenming Zou; Ling Wang; Wei Wang; Danya Zhang; Hanjie Xu; Jie Li; Fei Li; Danfeng Luo; Xiangyi Ma; Ding Ma; Songwei Tan; Rui Wei; Ling Xi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.