OBJECTIVE: To examine the proportion of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) patients receiving pharmacologic DPN treatments and specifically to identify the rates and factors associated with opioid use and first-line opioid use. METHODS: A 10% sample of IMS-LifeLink claims data from 1998 through 2008 was used. The study population consisted of diabetic patients who met DPN criteria using a validated DPN algorithm. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and other clinical characteristics was used to identify factors associated with any DPN pharmacologic treatment, any opioid use, and first-line opioid treatment. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore variations in exclusion criteria as well as opioid use definitions. RESULTS: A total of 666 DPN patients met inclusion criteria and pharmacologic treatment was received by 288 patients (43.24%) and of those, 154 (53.47%) had DPN-related opioid use and 96 (33.33%) received opioid as first-line treatment. Persons with diabetic complications were more likely to use opioids (odds ratio=4.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-18.92). Food and Drug Administration-approved DPN agents duloxetine 1.04% (n=3) and pregabalin 5.56% (n=16) had much lower rates of use. DPN-related drug use and DPN-related opioid usage increased as we used less restrictive samples in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids were the most frequently prescribed first-line agents for DPN. More than 50% of DPN patients remained untreated with pharmacologic agents 1 year after a DPN diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the proportion of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) patients receiving pharmacologic DPN treatments and specifically to identify the rates and factors associated with opioid use and first-line opioid use. METHODS: A 10% sample of IMS-LifeLink claims data from 1998 through 2008 was used. The study population consisted of diabeticpatients who met DPN criteria using a validated DPN algorithm. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and other clinical characteristics was used to identify factors associated with any DPN pharmacologic treatment, any opioid use, and first-line opioid treatment. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore variations in exclusion criteria as well as opioid use definitions. RESULTS: A total of 666 DPNpatients met inclusion criteria and pharmacologic treatment was received by 288 patients (43.24%) and of those, 154 (53.47%) had DPN-related opioid use and 96 (33.33%) received opioid as first-line treatment. Persons with diabetic complications were more likely to use opioids (odds ratio=4.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-18.92). Food and Drug Administration-approved DPN agents duloxetine 1.04% (n=3) and pregabalin 5.56% (n=16) had much lower rates of use. DPN-related drug use and DPN-related opioid usage increased as we used less restrictive samples in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids were the most frequently prescribed first-line agents for DPN. More than 50% of DPNpatients remained untreated with pharmacologic agents 1 year after a DPN diagnosis.
Authors: N Attal; G Cruccu; M Haanpää; P Hansson; T S Jensen; T Nurmikko; C Sampaio; S Sindrup; P Wiffen Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Robert H Dworkin; Alec B O'Connor; Joseph Audette; Ralf Baron; Geoffrey K Gourlay; Maija L Haanpää; Joel L Kent; Elliot J Krane; Alyssa A Lebel; Robert M Levy; Sean C Mackey; John Mayer; Christine Miaskowski; Srinivasa N Raja; Andrew S C Rice; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett Stacey; Steven Stanos; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Dennis C Turk; Gary A Walco; Christopher D Wells Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: P J Dyck; K M Kratz; J L Karnes; W J Litchy; R Klein; J M Pach; D M Wilson; P C O'Brien; L J Melton; F J Service Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Cynthia L Hartsfield; Eli J Korner; Jennifer L Ellis; Marsha A Raebel; John Merenich; Nancy Brandenburg Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Maria T Chao; Dean Schillinger; Unity Nguyen; Trilce Santana; Rhianon Liu; Steve Gregorich; Frederick M Hecht Journal: Pain Med Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Michael D Staudt; Tarun Prabhala; Breanna L Sheldon; Nicholas Quaranta; Michael Zakher; Ravneet Bhullar; Julie G Pilitsis; Charles E Argoff Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2020-08-28
Authors: Michael R Ruff; Saadet Inan; Xiang Qun Shi; Joseph J Meissler; Martin W Adler; Toby K Eisenstein; Ji Zhang Journal: Life Sci Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 6.780
Authors: Grace A Kanzawa-Lee; Robert Knoerl; Clare Donohoe; Celia M Bridges; Ellen M Lavoie Smith Journal: Semin Oncol Nurs Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 2.315
Authors: John A Kessler; Aziz Shaibani; Christine N Sang; Mark Christiansen; David Kudrow; Aaron Vinik; Nari Shin Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Brian C Callaghan; Evan Reynolds; Mousumi Banerjee; Kevin A Kerber; Lesli E Skolarus; James F Burke Journal: Pain Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 7.926