| Literature DB >> 25853491 |
Holly L Lutz1, Wesley M Hochachka2, Joshua I Engel3, Jeffrey A Bell4, Vasyl V Tkach4, John M Bates3, Shannon J Hackett3, Jason D Weckstein5.
Abstract
Avian host life history traits have been hypothesized to predict rates of infection by haemosporidian parasites. Using molecular techniques, we tested this hypothesis for parasites from three haemosporidian genera (Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon) collected from a diverse sampling of birds in northern Malawi. We found that host life history traits were significantly associated with parasitism rates by all three parasite genera. Nest type and nest location predicted infection probability for all three parasite genera, whereas flocking behavior is an important predictor of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infection and habitat is an important predictor of Leucocytozoon infection. Parasite prevalence was 79.1% across all individuals sampled, higher than that reported for comparable studies from any other region of the world. Parasite diversity was also exceptionally high, with 248 parasite cytochrome b lineages identified from 152 host species. A large proportion of Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon parasite DNA sequences identified in this study represent new, previously undocumented lineages (n = 201; 81% of total identified) based on BLAST queries against the avian malaria database, MalAvi.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25853491 PMCID: PMC4390322 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of sampling locations in northern Malawi.
Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, red; Nyika National Park, orange. Image credit: USGS National Map Viewer.
Sampling localities and habitat types in Malawi.
| Field Site | Habitats Sampled |
|---|---|
| Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve | Lake edge |
| Latitude: 11° 08.033’ S | Marsh |
| Longitude: 33° 39.307’ E | Miombo woodland |
| Elevation: 1071–1170 m | Riparian woodland |
| Nyika National Park | Evergreen forest |
| Latitude: 10° 35.307’ S | Miombo woodland |
| Longitude: 33° 48.670’ E | Montane grassland (open) |
| Elevation: 1647–2347 m | Montane grassland (scrub-lined watercourse) |
| Riparian woodland |
Fixed effects in the set of 15 models and the relative support of data for these models (ΔAICC values) from AIC-based multi-model comparisons. We used these comparisons to identify life history traits associated with rates of haemosporidian parasitism of avian hosts. An “X” indicates that a given trait (column) was used as a fixed effect, categorical variable in a given model (row). For each parasite genus the model with the ΔAICC value of zero is the best-supported model.
| Model # | Nest Location | Nest Type | Flocking Behavior | Habitat | Study Site | ΔAICC Plasmodium | ΔAICC Haemoproteus | ΔAICC Leucocytozoon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | X | X | 5.224 | 2.435 | 11.471 | |||
| 2 | X | X | 1.852 | 3.096 | 24.121 | |||
| 3 | X | X | 0.222 | 5.594 | 22.932 | |||
| 4 | X | X | 7.633 | 10.063 | 11.162 | |||
| 5 | X | X | X | 2.276 | 1.680 | 12.450 | ||
| 6 | X | X | X | 3.690 | 0.662 | 12.770 | ||
| 7 | X | X | X | 11.716 | 8.230 | 1.939 | ||
| 8 | X | X | X | 0 | 2.539 | 24.176 | ||
| 9 | X | X | X | 7.274 | 6.723 | 9.258 | ||
| 10 | X | X | X | 6.020 | 7.331 | 13.148 | ||
| 11 | X | X | X | X | 0.744 | 0 | 14.211 | |
| 12 | X | X | X | X | 13.336 | 5.140 | 0 | |
| 13 | X | X | X | X | 10.380 | 4.579 | 5.262 | |
| 14 | X | X | X | X | 4.615 | 3.951 | 12.133 | |
| 15 | X | X | X | X | X | 6.896 | 4.038 | 3.719 |
aNest Location: Ground, Understory, Canopy/Sub-canopy, Cliff or bank
bNest Type: Open cup, Closed cup, Cavity
cFlocking Behavior: Solitary, Monospecific flock or family group, Mixed-species flock
dHabitat: Woodland, Grassland or Marsh, Forest edge, Aquatic, Evergreen forest
eStudy Site: Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Nyika National Park
Tests of statistical significance of host phylogenetic constraints on probability of parasitism. Phylogenetic effects were examined in our analyses by including nested random effects of host family, genus (within family), and species (within genus) on the probabilities of parasitism with each of the three genera of parasites. Statistical tests were likelihood ratio tests each with a single degree of freedom.
| Parasite genus | Host taxonomic level | Chi-squared value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Family | 4.53 | 0.03 | |
| Genus (within Family) | 0.00 | 1 | |
| Species (within Genus) | 0.00 | 1 | |
|
| |||
| Family | 0.00 | 0.97 | |
| Genus (within Family) | 1.27 | 0.26 | |
| Species (within Genus) | 6.40 | 0.01 | |
|
| |||
| Family | 0.30 | 0.59 | |
| Genus (within Family) | 1.82 | 0.18 | |
| Species (within Genus) | 0.00 | 0.97 |
AIC-based support for fixed effects. Values are sums of model weight values for all models in the set (Table 2).
| Fixed Effect |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Nest type | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.72 |
| Nest location | 0.34 | 0.78 | 0.99 |
| Flocking Behavior | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.14 |
| Habitat | 0.06 | 0.15 | 1 |
Model-averaged regression coefficients, standard errors, and 95% confidence limits used to estimate effects of predictors and precision of effects. Note that for each predictor, the regression coefficients are interpreted as describing deviations in parasitism rates from a reference category whose effect is subsumed into the intercept term of the statistical model. Thus, although we can compare parasitism rates of understory nesting species with ground nesting species (the reference category for nest location) using the model-averaged regression coefficients, we cannot use these coefficients to directly compare parasitism rates of understory and canopy nesters.
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Parameter | Parameter description | Beta | Lower CL | Upper CL | Beta | Lower CL | Upper CL | Beta | Lower CL | Upper CL | |
| (Intercept) | −1.53 | −2.49 | −0.57 | −1.14 | −2.64 | 0.37 | −3.48 | −5.21 | −1.74 | ||
| Nest Location | Understory | 0.38 | −0.38 | 1.14 | 0.39 | −0.81 | 1.60 | 1.83 | 0.64 | 3.02 | |
| Nest Location | Canopy/Subcanopy | 0.62 | −0.29 | 1.52 | 1.55 | 0.28 | 2.83 | 2.35 | 0.97 | 3.72 | |
| Nest Location | Cliff/Bank | 1.94 | 0.07 | 3.81 | 0.51 | −1.97 | 2.99 | −0.49 | −3.32 | 2.34 | |
| Nest Type | Closed cup | 0.71 | 0.06 | 1.36 | −1.12 | −2.07 | −0.17 | −0.28 | −1.18 | 0.62 | |
| Nest Type | Cavity | −0.24 | −1.08 | 0.6 | 0.42 | −0.65 | 1.50 | 1.38 | 0.19 | 2.57 | |
| Flocking Behavior | Same-species flock or family group | 0.5 | −0.12 | 1.12 | −0.87 | −1.75 | 0.02 | −0.12 | −0.94 | 0.69 | |
| Flocking Behavior | Mixed-species flock | 0.89 | 0.17 | 1.61 | −1.28 | −2.32 | −0.23 | 0.19 | −0.74 | 1.12 | |
| Habitat | Grassland/Marsh | −0.27 | −1.07 | 0.54 | −0.37 | −1.56 | 0.83 | 1.67 | 0.37 | 2.97 | |
| Habitat | Forest edge | −0.02 | −0.77 | 0.73 | 0.27 | −0.74 | 1.28 | 1.47 | 0.30 | 2.64 | |
| Habitat | Aquatic | −0.68 | −3.29 | 1.94 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Habitat | Evergreen forest | −0.53 | −1.44 | 0.38 | 0.52 | −0.67 | 1.71 | 2.49 | 1.25 | 3.73 | |
| Site | Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve | 0.84 | 0.36 | 1.31 | −0.08 | −0.84 | 0.68 | −1.38 | −2.13 | −0.62 | |
*Aquatic habitat was only included as a fixed effect for Plasmodium analysis, as zero individuals from aquatic habitats were infected by Haemoproteus or Leucocytozoon.
Fig 2Predicted (least-squares mean) probabilities of parasitism and their 95% confidence intervals.
Expected rates of parasitism illustrated according to (a—c) host nest type, (d—f) host nest location, (g—h) host flocking behavior, and (i) habitat. For all panels, Plasmodium is represented by a black diamond and the letter “P”, Haemoproteus is represented by a black square and the letter “H”, and Leucocytozoon is represented by a black circle and the letter “L”. Number of individuals and species comprising each trait are listed below their respective traits (number of individuals above, number of species below in parentheses). Note that the parasitism rate of zero has been plotted for the aquatic habitat without confidence intervals; because the four individual aquatic-habitat birds sampled lack Leucocytozoon infections and therefore could not be used in the statistical analysis (as noted in the Methods section) Thus no measure of statistical confidence is associated with this aquatic habitat plotted point.
Rates of parasitism by higher level avian taxa (Order and Family).
| Host | Host | Host Species | Host Samples | Plasmodium | Haemoproteus | Leucocytozoon | Uninfected | Genus Unknown | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order | Family | (n) | (n) | Infected (n) | % | Infected (n) | % | Infected (n) | % | (n) | % | (n) | % |
| Anseriformes | Anatidae | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 67% | 0 | 0% |
| Bucerotiformes | Bucerotidae | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% |
| Caprimulgiformes | Caprimulgidae | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 100% | 0 | 0% |
| Ciconiiformes | Ardeidae | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 67% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 33% |
| Scopidae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
| Coliiformes | Coliidae | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% |
| Columbiformes | Columbidae | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 70% | 1 | 10% | 3 | 30% | 0 | 0% |
| Coraciiformes | Alcedinidae | 3 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 3 | 60% | 1 | 20% | 1 | 20% | 1 | 20% |
| Coraciidae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | |
| Meropidae | 2 | 8 | 1 | 13% | 3 | 38% | 1 | 13% | 4 | 50% | 0 | 0% | |
| Cuculiformes | Cuculidae | 3 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 2 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 25% | 0 | 0% |
| Falconiformes | Accipitridae | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Galliformes | Numididae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Phasianidae | 3 | 6 | 1 | 17% | 1 | 17% | 2 | 33% | 3 | 50% | 1 | 17% | |
| Gruiformes | Rallidae | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Musophagiformes | Musophagidae | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% |
| Passeriformes | Alaudidae | 1 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 33% | 0 | 0% |
| Cisticolidae | 11 | 45 | 27 | 60% | 4 | 9% | 8 | 18% | 9 | 20% | 5 | 11% | |
| Corvidae | 1 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | 0 | 0% | |
| Dicruridae | 1 | 5 | 2 | 40% | 1 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 20% | 1 | 20% | |
| Emberizidae | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
| Estrildidae | 11 | 44 | 18 | 41% | 5 | 11% | 15 | 34% | 13 | 30% | 2 | 5% | |
| Eurylaimidae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
| Fringillidae | 4 | 23 | 8 | 35% | 6 | 26% | 9 | 39% | 4 | 17% | 4 | 17% | |
| Hirundidae | 3 | 5 | 3 | 60% | 1 | 20% | 1 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
| Laniidae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | |
| Malaconotidae | 6 | 15 | 12 | 80% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 40% | 2 | 13% | 2 | 13% | |
| Monarchidae | 2 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 1 | 20% | 3 | 60% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
| Motacillidae | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | |
| Muscicapidae | 12 | 62 | 27 | 44% | 14 | 23% | 24 | 39% | 14 | 23% | 7 | 11% | |
| Nectariniidae | 8 | 28 | 6 | 21% | 14 | 50% | 6 | 21% | 6 | 21% | 1 | 4% | |
| Oriolidae | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | |
| Paridae | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | |
| Passeridae | 3 | 7 | 3 | 43% | 2 | 29% | 1 | 14% | 1 | 14% | 0 | 0% | |
| Platysteiridae | 2 | 20 | 8 | 40% | 3 | 15% | 8 | 40% | 4 | 20% | 5 | 25% | |
| Ploceidae | 9 | 57 | 38 | 67% | 4 | 7% | 16 | 28% | 5 | 9% | 6 | 11% | |
| Pycnonotidae | 5 | 44 | 12 | 27% | 15 | 34% | 28 | 64% | 4 | 9% | 7 | 16% | |
| Remizidae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | |
| Stenostiridae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | |
| Sturnidae | 4 | 12 | 4 | 33% | 7 | 58% | 4 | 33% | 2 | 17% | 1 | 8% | |
| Sylviidae | 9 | 33 | 8 | 24% | 9 | 27% | 6 | 18% | 13 | 39% | 2 | 6% | |
| Timaliidae | 2 | 6 | 1 | 17% | 1 | 17% | 4 | 67% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 33% | |
| Turdidae | 4 | 15 | 5 | 33% | 3 | 20% | 8 | 53% | 3 | 20% | 1 | 7% | |
| Viduidae | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | |
| Zosteropidae | 1 | 14 | 3 | 21% | 13 | 93% | 10 | 71% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 7% | |
| Piciformes | Indicatoridae | 3 | 5 | 2 | 40% | 1 | 20% | 3 | 60% | 3 | 60% | 0 | 0% |
| Picidae | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | 0 | 0% | |
| Ramphastidae | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 33% | 1 | 17% | |
| Psittaciformes | Psittacidae | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Trogoniformes | Trogonidae | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% |
Haemosporidian abundance and diversity.
|
|
|
| Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals infected (n) | 203 | 132 | 198 | 421 |
| % of total infected | 48.2% | 31.4% | 47.0% | 79.1% |
| Novel cytochrome | 59 | 53 | 89 | 201 |
| Described cytochrome | 22 | 16 | 9 | 47 |
| Total lineages identified | 81 | 69 | 98 | 248 |
aSee MalAvi database for lineage information [57].
The distribution of resolved coinfections among three genera of parasites.
| P*P | H*H | L*L | P*H | P*L | H*L | P*H*L | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals (n) | 28 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 64 | 48 | 6 |
|
| % of total infected | 6.7% | 0.2% | 3.8% | 2.4% | 15.2% | 11.4% | 1.4% | 40.9% |
P = Plasmodium spp.
H = Haemoproteus spp.
L = Leucocytozoon spp.
Comparative overview of some studies in avian haemosporidian prevalence and diversity.
| Location | Length of study | Host Orders (n) | Host Families (n) | Host Species (n) | Individuals Sampled (n) | % | % | % | Total prevalence among all individuals sampled | Parasite detection method | Parasite lineages identified (n) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Malawi | 2009 | 16 | 50 | 152 | 532 | 50% | 23.6% | 36.1% | 79.1% | PCR | 248 | This study |
| Cameroon, Gabon | 2002–2004 | 9 | 29 | 93 | 527 | 45% | 23% | 7% | NA | PCR | 117 | Beadell |
| Madagascar | 1993–2004 | 7 | 26 | 64 | 947 | 1.9% | 17.4% | 9.4% | NA | Microscopy | 45 | Savage |
| Cameroon Gabon Tanzania MalawiSouth Africa | NA | 1 | 8 | 25 | 1364 | 20.1% | NA | NA | 20.1% | PCR | 34 | Loiseau |
| Western Indian Ocean | 1999–2002 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 150 | 32% | 13.3% | NA | 45.3% | PCR | 16 | Ishtiaq |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Myanmar | 1994–2004 | 5 | 52 | 133 | 335 | 20.3% | 13.4% | NA | 34% | PCR & Microscopy | 75 | Ishtiaq |
| India | 43 | 183 | 27.9% | 18% | NA | |||||||
| South Korea | 46 | 181 | 30.9% | 11% | NA | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Australia | 2002–2003 | 3 | 8 | 32 | 219 | 14% | 28% | NA | 44% | PCR | 78 | Beadell |
| Papua New Guinea | 1991–2002 | 77 | 209 | 10% | 31% | NA | ||||||
| New Zealand | 2003–2006 | 3 | 21 | 25 | 820 | 52.9% | NA | NA | 52.9% | 8 | Ewen | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| United States Canada | ∼1940–1975 | 17 | 55 | 388 | 57026 | 3.8% | 19.5% | 17.7% | NA | Microscopy | NA | Greiner |
| Costa Rica | 1987–1991 | 4 | 15 | 60 | 479 | 0.4% | 9.4% | 0.4% | 11% | Microscopy | NA | Young |
| United States | 1988 | 1 | 8 | 19 | 935 | 3.4% | 22.8% | 1.3% | NA | Microscopy | NA | Garvin & Remsen 1997 [ |
| Lesser Antilles | NA | 7 | 17 | 53 | 1975 | 10.3% | 36.1% | NA | 27.6% | PCR & Microscopy | 26 | Fallon |
| United States | 1999–2002 | 2 | 13 | 42 | 757 | NA | NA | 0% | ∼38.6% | PCR & Microscopy | 34 | Ricklefs |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Panama | 1969–1976 | 4 | 36 | 281 | 3715 | 5% | 9% | <1% | ∼15% | Microscopy | NA | Sousa & Herman 1982 [ |
| Bolivia | 1988 | 7 | 25 | 135 | 641 | 1.1% | 1.4% | NA | 2.5% | Microscopy | NA | Bennett |
| Brazil | 2000 | 1 | 9 | 45 | 275 | 39.6% | NA | NA | 39.6% | PCR & Microscopy | NA | Ribeiro |
| Guyana | 1994–2000 | 4 | 10 | 53 | 195 | 24.6% | 13.8% | NA | 42.1% | PCR & Microscopy | 59 | Durrant |
| Uruguay | 2002–2003 | 41 | 111 | 322 | 17.8% | 3.7% | NA | 24.2% | ||||
| Colombia | 2001–2002 | 4 | 12 | 75 | 302 | 5.6% | 2.6% | 0.3% | 8.6% | Microscopy | NA | Londoño |
| Chile | 2003–2005 | NA | NA | 26 | 617 | 6.5% | 5.0% | 8.9% | 15.4% | PCR & Microscopy | 27 | Merino |
| Colombia | 2002–2003 | 5 | 14 | 40 | 136 | 8.1% | 1.5% | 21.3% | NA | Microscopy | NA | Rodríguez |
| Brazil | 2007–2009 | 2 | 29 | 122 | 676 | 49% combined | NA | 49% | PCR & Microscopy | 21 | Belo | |
| Brazil | 2005–2009 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 772 | 3.6% | 7.1% | 0% | 10.7% | Microscopy | NA | Fecchio |
| Venezuela | 2011 | 2 | 12 | 24 | 47 | 4.3% | 6.4% | 2.1% | 10.6% | PCR | 6 | Mijares |
| Brazil | 2005–2009 | 6 | 18 | 54 | 790 | 4.8% | 11.3% | NA | 16.1% | PCR | 22 | Fecchio |
| Brazil | 2000–2006 2010 | 2 | 21 | 194 | 1545 | 23% | 4.5% | NA | 35.3% | PCR | 110 | Lacorte |
| Ecuador | 2001–2010 | 1 | 22 | 144 | 2488 | 9% | 6% | NA | 21.7% | PCR | 65 | Svensson-Coelho |
| Colombia | 1999–2011 | NA | 41 | 169 | 246 | 3.0% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 12.8% | Microscopy | NA | González |
*Calculations based on total individuals infected out of total individuals sampled Ni/N; values are not always directly comparable between studies due to variation in haemosporidian genera examined.
†Lineages n = 3 found in doves but not assigned to haemosporidian genus were considered Haemoproteus Haemoproteus spp. and included in calculation of % Haemoproteus infection.