Literature DB >> 25853284

Using structural MRI to identify individuals at genetic risk for bipolar disorders: a 2-cohort, machine learning study.

Tomas Hajek1, Christopher Cooke1, Miloslav Kopecek1, Tomas Novak1, Cyril Hoschl1, Martin Alda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brain imaging is of limited diagnostic use in psychiatry owing to clinical heterogeneity and low sensitivity/specificity of between-group neuroimaging differences. Machine learning (ML) may better translate neuroimaging to the level of individual participants. Studying unaffected offspring of parents with bipolar disorders (BD) decreases clinical heterogeneity and thus increases sensitivity for detection of biomarkers. The present study used ML to identify individuals at genetic high risk (HR) for BD based on brain structure.
METHODS: We studied unaffected and affected relatives of BD probands recruited from 2 sites (Halifax, Canada, and Prague, Czech Republic). Each participant was individually matched by age and sex to controls without personal or family history of psychiatric disorders. We applied support vector machines (SVM) and Gaussian process classifiers (GPC) to structural MRI.
RESULTS: We included 45 unaffected and 36 affected relatives of BD probands matched by age and sex on an individual basis to healthy controls. The SVM of white matter distinguished unaffected HR from control participants (accuracy = 68.9%, p = 0.001), with similar accuracy for the GPC (65.6%, p = 0.002) or when analyzing data from each site separately. Differentiation of the more clinically heterogeneous affected familiar group from healthy controls was less accurate (accuracy = 59.7%, p = 0.05). Machine learning applied to grey matter did not distinguish either the unaffected HR or affected familial groups from controls. The regions that most contributed to between-group discrimination included white matter of the inferior/middle frontal gyrus, inferior/middle temporal gyrus and precuneus. LIMITATIONS: Although we recruited 126 participants, ML benefits from even larger samples.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning applied to white but not grey matter distinguished unaffected participants at high and low genetic risk for BD based on regions previously implicated in the pathophysiology of BD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25853284      PMCID: PMC4543094          DOI: 10.1503/jpn.140142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci        ISSN: 1180-4882            Impact factor:   6.186


  48 in total

1.  Third-generation neuroimaging in early schizophrenia: translating research evidence into clinical utility.

Authors:  Stefan Borgwardt; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Classification of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls from structural MRI scans in two large independent samples.

Authors:  Mireille Nieuwenhuis; Neeltje E M van Haren; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Wiepke Cahn; René S Kahn; Hugo G Schnack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Using Support Vector Machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review.

Authors:  Graziella Orrù; William Pettersson-Yeo; Andre F Marquand; Giuseppe Sartori; Andrea Mechelli
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  New structural brain imaging endophenotype in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  K Matsuo; M Kopecek; M A Nicoletti; J P Hatch; Y Watanabe; F G Nery; G Zunta-Soares; J C Soares
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  Brain structural signature of familial predisposition for bipolar disorder: replicable evidence for involvement of the right inferior frontal gyrus.

Authors:  Tomas Hajek; Jeffrey Cullis; Tomas Novak; Miloslav Kopecek; Ryan Blagdon; Lukas Propper; Pavla Stopkova; Anne Duffy; Cyril Hoschl; Rudolf Uher; Tomas Paus; L Trevor Young; Martin Alda
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Mapping vulnerability to bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Oliver Howes; Andreas Bechdolf; Stefan Borgwardt
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.186

7.  The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a consensus model.

Authors:  Stephen M Strakowski; Caleb M Adler; Jorge Almeida; Lori L Altshuler; Hilary P Blumberg; Kiki D Chang; Melissa P DelBello; Sophia Frangou; Andrew McIntosh; Mary L Phillips; Jessika E Sussman; Jennifer D Townsend
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.744

8.  Hippocampal volumes in bipolar disorders: opposing effects of illness burden and lithium treatment.

Authors:  Tomas Hajek; Jeffrey Cullis; Tomas Novak; Miloslav Kopecek; Cyril Höschl; Ryan Blagdon; Claire O'Donovan; Michael Bauer; L Trevor Young; Glenda Macqueen; Martin Alda
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 9.  The neuroprogressive nature of major depressive disorder: pathways to disease evolution and resistance, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  S Moylan; M Maes; N R Wray; M Berk
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Smaller hippocampal volumes in patients with bipolar disorder are masked by exposure to lithium: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomas Hajek; Miloslav Kopecek; Cyril Höschl; Martin Alda
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Neural Predictors of Initiating Alcohol Use During Adolescence.

Authors:  Lindsay M Squeglia; Tali M Ball; Joanna Jacobus; Ty Brumback; Benjamin S McKenna; Tam T Nguyen-Louie; Scott F Sorg; Martin P Paulus; Susan F Tapert
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders - 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group.

Authors:  Abraham Nunes; Hugo G Schnack; Christopher R K Ching; Ingrid Agartz; Theophilus N Akudjedu; Martin Alda; Dag Alnæs; Silvia Alonso-Lana; Jochen Bauer; Bernhard T Baune; Erlend Bøen; Caterina Del Mar Bonnin; Geraldo F Busatto; Erick J Canales-Rodríguez; Dara M Cannon; Xavier Caseras; Tiffany M Chaim-Avancini; Udo Dannlowski; Ana M Díaz-Zuluaga; Bruno Dietsche; Nhat Trung Doan; Edouard Duchesnay; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen; Daniel Emden; Lisa T Eyler; Mar Fatjó-Vilas; Pauline Favre; Sonya F Foley; Janice M Fullerton; David C Glahn; Jose M Goikolea; Dominik Grotegerd; Tim Hahn; Chantal Henry; Derrek P Hibar; Josselin Houenou; Fleur M Howells; Neda Jahanshad; Tobias Kaufmann; Joanne Kenney; Tilo T J Kircher; Axel Krug; Trine V Lagerberg; Rhoshel K Lenroot; Carlos López-Jaramillo; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Ulrik F Malt; Colm McDonald; Philip B Mitchell; Benson Mwangi; Leila Nabulsi; Nils Opel; Bronwyn J Overs; Julian A Pineda-Zapata; Edith Pomarol-Clotet; Ronny Redlich; Gloria Roberts; Pedro G Rosa; Raymond Salvador; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Jair C Soares; Dan J Stein; Henk S Temmingh; Thomas Trappenberg; Anne Uhlmann; Neeltje E M van Haren; Eduard Vieta; Lars T Westlye; Daniel H Wolf; Dilara Yüksel; Marcus V Zanetti; Ole A Andreassen; Paul M Thompson; Tomas Hajek
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 15.992

3.  Individuals at increased risk for development of bipolar disorder display structural alterations similar to people with manifest disease.

Authors:  Pavol Mikolas; Kyra Bröckel; Christoph Vogelbacher; Dirk K Müller; Michael Marxen; Christina Berndt; Cathrin Sauer; Stine Jung; Juliane Hilde Fröhner; Andreas J Fallgatter; Thomas Ethofer; Anne Rau; Tilo Kircher; Irina Falkenberg; Martin Lambert; Vivien Kraft; Karolina Leopold; Andreas Bechdolf; Andreas Reif; Silke Matura; Thomas Stamm; Felix Bermpohl; Jana Fiebig; Georg Juckel; Vera Flasbeck; Christoph U Correll; Philipp Ritter; Michael Bauer; Andreas Jansen; Andrea Pfennig
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Distinguish bipolar and major depressive disorder in adolescents based on multimodal neuroimaging: Results from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study®.

Authors:  Yujun Liu; Kai Chen; Yangyang Luo; Jiqiu Wu; Qu Xiang; Li Peng; Jian Zhang; Weiling Zhao; Mingliang Li; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-09-05

5.  Distinguishing bipolar and major depressive disorders by brain structural morphometry: a pilot study.

Authors:  Germaine Fung; Yi Deng; Qing Zhao; Zhi Li; Miao Qu; Ke Li; Ya-Wei Zeng; Zhen Jin; Yan-Tao Ma; Xin Yu; Zhi-Ren Wang; David H K Shum; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Machine learning classification of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders and controls using whole brain white matter fractional anisotropy.

Authors:  Pavol Mikolas; Jaroslav Hlinka; Antonin Skoch; Zbynek Pitra; Thomas Frodl; Filip Spaniel; Tomas Hajek
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 7.  Structural neuroimaging as clinical predictor: A review of machine learning applications.

Authors:  José María Mateos-Pérez; Mahsa Dadar; María Lacalle-Aurioles; Yasser Iturria-Medina; Yashar Zeighami; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Proteomic Profiling as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Discriminating Between Bipolar and Unipolar Depression.

Authors:  Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Tim Hahn; Frieder Haenisch; Rhiannon McNeill; Andreas Reif; Sabine Bahn
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.