Literature DB >> 25853228

Easy To Synthesize, Robust Organo-osmium Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation Catalysts.

James P C Coverdale1, Carlos Sanchez-Cano1, Guy J Clarkson1, Rina Soni1, Martin Wills2, Peter J Sadler3.   

Abstract

Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (ATH) is an important process in organic synthesis for which the Noyori-type Ru(II) catalysts [(arene)Ru(Tsdiamine)] are now well established and widely used. We now demonstrate for the first time the catalytic activity of the osmium analogues. X-ray crystal structures of the 16-electron Os(II) catalysts are almost identical to those of Ru(II). Intriguingly the precursor complex was isolated as a dichlorido complex with a monodentate amine ligand. The Os(II) catalysts are readily synthesised (within 1 h) and exhibit excellent enantioselectivity in ATH reactions of ketones.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asymmetric catalysis; hydrogen transfer; ketone reduction; organometallic complexes; osmium

Year:  2015        PMID: 25853228      PMCID: PMC4832837          DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


Maintaining control over chirality is essential during many chemical syntheses and so it has become necessary to obtain enantiopure products cost‐effectively. Selective reduction of prochiral starting materials provides a simple route to such compounds.1 The Noyori catalyst [Ru(p‐cymene)(TsDPEN)Cl], (H)TsDPEN = N‐p‐tosyl‐1,2‐diphenylethylenediamine, 1 celebrates two decades of use in the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (ATH) of ketones and imines, often achieving high enantioselectivities (ee) and full conversions in under 24 h.1–2 Upon treatment with base in the course of a catalytic application, Ru pre‐catalyst 1 eliminates HCl, forming the active 16‐electron amido complex 2. During the reduction, the catalyst cycles between 2 which contains a pseudo‐planar chelated ligand and an 18‐electron ‘hydride’ species 3 (bearing hydrido and amine ligands).2, 3 The catalysis is considered to be an outer‐sphere ligand‐assisted process3 since the substrate has no direct interaction with the metal centre (Figure 1). Instead, chiral components on the diamine ligand bring about a six‐membered transition state using both steric and electronic effects,2, 3 allowing hydrogenation from both the Ru—H and N—H centres to occur directly with the substrate. Because a favoured diastereoisomer of hydride is regenerated during each cycle, the catalyst is configurationally defined at the metal centre, and this chirality is relayed to the product in the reduction.2c X‐ray crystallographic structures of the pre‐catalyst, catalyst and hydrido species have been reported.3a
Figure 1

Ruthenium pre‐catalyst (R,R)‐1, active amido catalyst (R,R)‐2 and hydrido species (R,R)‐3 shown together with the transition state for reduction of ketones by (R,R)‐3. The catalyst derived from the diamine of R,R configuration gives the acetophenone product of R‐configuration.

Ruthenium pre‐catalyst (R,R)‐1, active amido catalyst (R,R)‐2 and hydrido species (R,R)‐3 shown together with the transition state for reduction of ketones by (R,R)‐3. The catalyst derived from the diamine of R,R configuration gives the acetophenone product of R‐configuration. Although research on transfer hydrogenation catalysts has largely been centred on RuII complexes,2–4 and to some extent those of Rh and Ir,5 little attention has been paid to the potential of closely related osmium(II) complexes. The first examples of osmium complexes for asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (and the reverse reaction of alcohol oxidation) were reported by Faller et al., using cis‐aminoindanol as the chiral ligand.6 Several chiral OsII complexes have been reported for asymmetric reductions including those containing l‐α‐amino carboxylates7 and pybox ligands.8 Monophosphinite complexes,9 iminopyridine complexes,10 and pincer complexes11 have also been described. Many of these reduce ketones with high enantioselectivities at very low loadings. In addition, OsII catalysts containing nonchiral ligands have been reported.12 Other low‐spin d6 organometallic analogues [M(Cp*)(Tsdiamine)Cl] with M=RhIII or IrIII have shown promise in their robustness and performance whilst maintaining the high enantioselectivities and conversions observed with the RuII catalysts,5 yet the chemistry of an Os‐centred analogue of the Noyori catalyst has never been explored. Here we report the first preparation of osmium analogues (4/5) of Noyori‐type catalysts (1/2). Importantly we find that the osmium catalysts are easy to synthesise, are stable, and yet still retain high enantioselectivity in asymmetric reductions of prochiral ketones. Ruthenium Noyori‐type catalysts are readily prepared using the dimer precursor [RuCl2(η6‐arene)]2, (arene most commonly p‐cymene) forming a chlorido pre‐catalyst when combined with the chiral ligand (1S,2S)‐(H)TsDPEN in 2‐propanol with a base.2e This method was unsuccessful for the Os complexes since the dimer was poorly soluble in 2‐propanol and decomposition products were observed by NMR spectroscopy. However, OsII pre‐catalysts were readily synthesised by microwave methods, combining the dimer [OsCl2(η6‐p‐cymene)]2 with a chiral diamine: either (1R,2R)‐(H)TsDPEN or (1S,2S)‐(H)TsDPEN, to produce both enantiomers: (R,R)‐4 a and (S,S)‐4 b (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Noyori Ru pre‐catalyst formation (top)2c, 3a The route to the osmium pre‐catalyst (bottom) differs in the absence of base to form 4 b. Upon subsequent treatment with a base they both form structurally similar 16‐electron active catalysts (2 b/5 b).2c, 3a Osmium catalysts 4 a/5 a (the opposite configuration) were synthesised by using (1R,2R)‐(H)TsDPEN.

Noyori Ru pre‐catalyst formation (top)2c, 3a The route to the osmium pre‐catalyst (bottom) differs in the absence of base to form 4 b. Upon subsequent treatment with a base they both form structurally similar 16‐electron active catalysts (2 b/5 b).2c, 3a Osmium catalysts 4 a/5 a (the opposite configuration) were synthesised by using (1R,2R)‐(H)TsDPEN. Owing to the absence of base, it was anticipated that these complexes would differ structurally from the chelated ruthenium species.3a Indeed, NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis suggested that 4 contained the diamine coordinated only by the terminal amine, while two chlorido ligands remained complexed to the metal centre (Figure 2 and Supporting Information). Treatment of either enantiomer of 4 with base yielded a red solution of active amido catalysts 5 a and 5 b, highly stable analogues of reported ruthenium complexes.3a The ability of 4 to still undergo activation by a Noyori‐type HCl elimination mechanism demonstrated that it was a suitable Os pre‐catalyst for ATH reactions. Alternatively, direct reaction of the Os‐dimer with either enantiomer of (H)TsDPEN with a base at room temperature provided a facile route to 5 a and 5 b (Figure 3), synthesised in less than an hour. Hence, although the osmium chloride complexes analogous to 1 remained elusive, their 16e amido derivatives 5 could be readily prepared. Moreover there is no need for an inert atmosphere during synthesis or storage.
Figure 3

Facile route for direct formation of 16‐electron amido OsII catalysts, with X‐ray crystal structures of both enantiomers: 5 a (left) and 5 b (right). All hydrogen atoms except those on the diamine and amide have been omitted for clarity.

Facile route for direct formation of 16‐electron amido OsII catalysts, with X‐ray crystal structures of both enantiomers: 5 a (left) and 5 b (right). All hydrogen atoms except those on the diamine and amide have been omitted for clarity. Though adapted ruthenium protocols to isolate the hydride using 2‐propanol3a and direct hydrogenation were not successful, the osmium hydride intermediate was observed in solution by NMR spectroscopy by treatment of 4 or 5 with triethylamine and formic acid. 1H NMR resonances of Os—H species were observed as two singlets at δ=−5.89 and −6.04 ppm each with 187Os satellites (1 J(187Os,1H)=44 Hz). This suggests that hydride transfer to 5 is not fully stereoselective. Subsequent enantioselectivity in substrate reduction may result from the greater reactivity of one of the two hydride diastereomers, as previously speculated in the case of RuII complexes.4a, 13 Alternatively, selectivity may be controlled by an alternate interaction of the substrate with the chiral ligand rather than a dependence on the configuration of the metal hydride. The X‐ray crystal structures of catalysts 5 a and 5 b were determined (Figure 3). The distorted octahedral OsII structures are remarkably similar to the Ru analogue 2.3a Particularly, the terminal amido N—H bond was found to be similar in length (0.96(3) Å compared to 0.88(6) Å in the Noyori catalyst). This bond is known to be important in the RuII catalysis mechanism14 and so its comparable length may help to explain the activities observed with OsII. The catalytic activity of 4 a and 4 b and their 16‐electron active counterparts 5 a and 5 b towards acetophenone reduction were studied in a formic acid/triethylamine azeotrope to give irreversible kinetic enantioselectivity.1–2 Catalyst loading was defined by the substrate/catalyst molar ratio, S/C. A Noyori‐type ATH cycle and hydrogen‐transfer mechanism was assumed based on the structural similarities between amido complex 5 b and its RuII counterpart 2. Complexes 4 a/4 b would be first converted into 5 a/5 b, respectively, before entering the catalytic cycle, hence the use of either 4 or 5 would be expected to give identical results. Complexes 4 and 5 were highly enantioselective for ATH, with >94 % ee controlled by the fixed chirality of the diamine. (S,S)‐Configured 4 b/5 b established reduction on the Si‐face, similarly to 2,1–2 while R,R‐configured 4 a/5 a selected for the Re‐face (reduction through an analogous transition state to that in Figure 1). Further reductions were undertaken using 4 a/4 b and selected acetophenone derivatives 6–10 (Tables 1 and 2). Enantioselectivities seem to be the result of both steric and electronic factors, consistent with observations for Ru,1–2 and a slight reduction of enantioselectivity for substrates bearing electron‐withdrawing substituents was observed.
Table 1

The publisher did not receive permission from the copyright owner to include this object in this version of this product. Please refer either to the publisher's own online version of this product or the printed product where one exists.

Table 2

The publisher did not receive permission from the copyright owner to include this object in this version of this product. Please refer either to the publisher's own online version of this product or the printed product where one exists.

The publisher did not receive permission from the copyright owner to include this object in this version of this product. Please refer either to the publisher's own online version of this product or the printed product where one exists. The publisher did not receive permission from the copyright owner to include this object in this version of this product. Please refer either to the publisher's own online version of this product or the printed product where one exists. Since reactions using the amido catalysts remained bright yellow, the reduction of acetophenone using 4 b was continued for a longer time. As anticipated, the conversion continued to increase with time (to 88 % after 48 h and 94 % after 72 h, Table 2), as the catalyst had not become deactivated. A high enantiomeric excess (95 %) was maintained, providing evidence for ATH irreversibility when using formic acid/triethylamine. The enantioselectivity compares well to ruthenium analogues but the reaction proceeded at a slower rate, for example, the conversion of ketone 6 at S/C=200 for Os complex 5 b to 94 % took 72 h, whilst Ru analogue 2 reached 99 % after 20 h at 28 °C (Table 2). In general the kinetics of substitution reactions at OsII arene centres are approximately 40–100× slower than at RuII.15 Though the osmium catalysts may not compete with the extent of conversion observed for ruthenium, they can be prepared easily in under an hour, and do not require an inert atmosphere during synthesis or storage. The 16‐electron amido complexes 5 a and 5 b are particularly stable in air, and can be prepared well in advance of requirement. This may be particularly useful in a laboratory setting, in which a chiral alcohol can be produced overnight (with high enantioselectivity) using a catalyst that may be synthesised and stored well in advance. These novel osmiumarene TsDPEN catalysts have been fully characterised and catalyse ATH reductions of acetophenone‐derived substrates with high enantioselectivity. The Os catalysts appear to follow a Noyori‐type ATH mechanism, with similar X‐ray crystal structures, hydrido intermediates observed by NMR and mass spectrometry, and behaviour in catalytic reductions. The ease and speed of preparation combined with high stability on storage of the osmium catalysts makes them attractive alternatives to existing ruthenium catalysts.

Experimental Section

General The synthesis and characterisation of complexes 4 a, 4 b, 5 a and 5 b, catalytic reductions, 1H NMR spectroscopy of osmium hydride species, and determination of the X‐ray structures of 5 a and 5 b are described in the Supporting Information. X‐ray crystallographic data CCDC‐1035611 http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/cgi‐bin/catreq.cgi (5 a), ‐1035612 http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/cgi‐bin/catreq.cgi (5 b) and ‐686925 http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/cgi‐bin/catreq.cgi (2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. miscellaneous_information Click here for additional data file.
  38 in total

1.  A practical access to highly enantiomerically pure flavanones by catalytic asymmetric transfer hydrogenation.

Authors:  Marie-Kristin Lemke; Pia Schwab; Petra Fischer; Sandra Tischer; Morris Witt; Laurence Noehringer; Victor Rogachev; Anne Jäger; Olga Kataeva; Roland Fröhlich; Peter Metz
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Realistic modeling of ruthenium-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Handgraaf; Evert Jan Meijer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of ketones with bifunctional transition metal-based molecular catalysts.

Authors:  Takao Ikariya; A John Blacker
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  The N-H functional group in organometallic catalysis.

Authors:  Baoguo Zhao; Zhaobin Han; Kuiling Ding
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Ruthenium and osmium complexes of hemilabile chiral monophosphinite ligands derived from 1D-pinitol or 1D-chiro-inositol as catalysts for asymmetric hydrogenation reactions.

Authors:  Angela T Slade; Cornelis Lensink; Andrew Falshaw; George R Clark; L James Wright
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Origin of enantioselectivity in the Ru(arene)(amino alcohol)-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation of ketones.

Authors:  Peter Brandt; Peter Roth; Pher G Andersson
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Rh III- and Ir III-catalyzed asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of ketones in water.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wu; Xiaohong Li; Antonio Zanotti-Gerosa; Allan Pettman; Jianke Liu; Allan James Mills; Jianliang Xiao
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 8.  Aqueous-phase asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of ketones--a greener approach to chiral alcohols.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wu; Jianliang Xiao
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of chiral phthalides by efficient reductive cyclization of 2-acylarylcarboxylates under aqueous transfer hydrogenation conditions.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Ming-Hua Xu; Guo-Qiang Lin
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.005

10.  Mirror-image organometallic osmium arene iminopyridine halido complexes exhibit similar potent anticancer activity.

Authors:  Ying Fu; Rina Soni; María J Romero; Ana M Pizarro; Luca Salassa; Guy J Clarkson; Jessica M Hearn; Abraha Habtemariam; Martin Wills; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.236

View more
  6 in total

1.  Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation by synthetic catalysts in cancer cells.

Authors:  James P C Coverdale; Isolda Romero-Canelón; Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Guy J Clarkson; Abraha Habtemariam; Martin Wills; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Half-Sandwich Ru(II) and Os(II) Bathophenanthroline Complexes Containing a Releasable Dichloroacetato Ligand.

Authors:  Pavel Štarha; Zdeněk Trávníček; Ján Vančo; Zdeněk Dvořák
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Computational Prediction of Chiral Iron Complexes for Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Pyruvic Acid to Lactic Acid.

Authors:  Wan Wang; Xinzheng Yang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Tracking Reactions of Asymmetric Organo-Osmium Transfer Hydrogenation Catalysts in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bolitho; James P C Coverdale; Hannah E Bridgewater; Guy J Clarkson; Paul D Quinn; Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  NMR studies of group 8 metallodrugs: 187Os-enriched organo-osmium half-sandwich anticancer complex.

Authors:  Russell J Needham; Ivan Prokes; Abraha Habtemariam; Isolda Romero-Canelón; Guy J Clarkson; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Halide Control of N,N-Coordination versus N,C-Cyclometalation and Stereospecific Phenyl Ring Deuteration of Osmium(II) p-Cymene Phenylazobenzothiazole Complexes.

Authors:  Russell J Needham; Abraha Habtemariam; Nicolas P E Barry; Guy Clarkson; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Organometallics       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.