Literature DB >> 25852881

Renal replacement therapy in Europe: a summary of the 2011 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report.

Marlies Noordzij1, Anneke Kramer1, José M Abad Diez2, Ramón Alonso de la Torre3, Emma Arcos Fuster4, Boris T Bikbov5, Marjolein Bonthuis6, Encarnación Bouzas Caamaño7, Svetlana Čala8, Fergus J Caskey9, Pablo Castro de la Nuez10, Harijs Cernevskis11, Frederic Collart12, Rafael Díaz Tejeiro13, Ljubica Djukanovic14, Manuel Ferrer-Alamar15, Patrik Finne16, María de Los Angelos García Bazaga17, Liliana Garneata18, Eliezer Golan19, Raquel Gonzalez Fernández20, James G Heaf21, Andries Hoitsma22, George A Ioannidis23, Mykola Kolesnyk24, Reinhard Kramar25, Mathilde Lasalle26, Torbjørn Leivestad27, Frantisek Lopot28, Moniek W M van de Luijtgaarden1, Fernando Macário29, Ángela Magaz30, Eduardo Martín Escobar31, Johan de Meester32, Wendy Metcalfe33, Mai Ots-Rosenberg34, Runolfur Palsson35, Celestino Piñera36, Maria Pippias1, Karl G Prütz37, Marina Ratkovic38, Halima Resić39, Aurelio Rodríguez Hernández40, Boleslaw Rutkowski41, Viera Spustová42, Vianda S Stel1, Olivera Stojceva-Taneva43, Gültekin Süleymanlar44, Christoph Wanner45, Kitty J Jager1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article provides a summary of the 2011 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report (available at www.era-edta-reg.org).
METHODS: Data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from national and regional renal registries in 30 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea were used. From 27 registries, individual patient data were received, whereas 17 registries contributed data in aggregated form. We present the incidence and prevalence of RRT, and renal transplant rates in 2011. In addition, survival probabilities and expected remaining lifetimes were calculated for those registries providing individual patient data.
RESULTS: The overall unadjusted incidence rate of RRT in 2011 among all registries reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry was 117 per million population (pmp) (n = 71.631). Incidence rates varied from 24 pmp in Ukraine to 238 pmp in Turkey. The overall unadjusted prevalence of RRT for ESRD on 31 December 2011 was 692 pmp (n = 425 824). The highest prevalence was reported by Portugal (1662 pmp) and the lowest by Ukraine (131 pmp). Among all registries, a total of 22 814 renal transplantations were performed (37 pmp). The highest overall transplant rate was reported from Spain, Cantabria (81 pmp), whereas the highest rate of living donor transplants was reported from Turkey (39 pmp). For patients who started RRT between 2002 and 2006, the unadjusted 5-year patient survival on RRT was 46.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.6-47.0], and on dialysis 39.3% (95% CI 39.2-39.4). The unadjusted 5-year patient survival after the first renal transplantation performed between 2002 and 2006 was 86.7% (95% CI 86.2-87.2) for kidneys from deceased donors and 94.3% (95% CI 93.6-95.0) for kidneys from living donors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  end-stage renal disease; incidence; prevalence; renal replacement therapy; survival

Year:  2014        PMID: 25852881      PMCID: PMC4377783          DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfu007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Kidney J        ISSN: 2048-8505


Introduction

This summary of the 2011 ERA–EDTA (European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association) Registry Annual Report includes data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using 44 data sets from national and regional renal registries in 30 countries in Europe and those bordering the Mediterranean Sea (Figure 1). Data sets with individual patient data were received from 27 national and regional registries in 15 countries, whereas 17 national registries from 17 countries contributed data in aggregated form.
Fig. 1.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 1, among all national and regional renal registries in 30 countries reporting to the ERA–EDTA Registry in 2011. B&H: Bosnia and Herzegovina; FYROM: Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; ME: Montenegro. The incidence data for Czech Republic, Slovakia and Turkey represent dialysis patients only.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 1, among all national and regional renal registries in 30 countries reporting to the ERA–EDTA Registry in 2011. B&H: Bosnia and Herzegovina; FYROM: Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; ME: Montenegro. The incidence data for Czech Republic, Slovakia and Turkey represent dialysis patients only. The analyses on incidence and prevalence and also on transplant rates were based on data from countries and regions that provided individual patient data or aggregated data, while the survival analysis and the calculation of expected remaining lifetimes were solely based on individual patient records. More detailed data than those presented in the current paper were published in the full 2011 ERA–EDTA Registry Annual Report [1], which is available online at www.era-edta-reg.org.

The incidence of RRT for ESRD

In 2011, a total number of 71 631 patients started RRT for ESRD among all registries reporting to the ERA–EDTA Registry. The total population covered by these registries was 615 million, resulting in an unadjusted incidence rate of 117 per million population (pmp). The highest unadjusted incidence rates were reported from Turkey (238 pmp), Portugal (226 pmp) and Greece (203 pmp), whereas the lowest unadjusted incidence rates were reported from Ukraine (24 pmp), Montenegro (26 pmp) and Russia (43 pmp). The incidence rate standardized for the EU27 population was also highest in Turkey (334 pmp). The mean age at the start of RRT was 63.4 years for countries or regions providing individual patient data and 60.0 years for countries providing aggregated data. There was a wide variation in the mean age at the start of RRT across countries, ranging from 47.9 years in Albania to 69.5 years in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium. In registries providing individual patient data, the percentage of patients of 65 years and older at the start of RRT was 54%, ranging from 34% in Spain, Cantabria to 70% in Belgium (Dutch-speaking part) (Figure 2).
Fig. 2.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 1 in 2011, unadjusted (black bars) and standardized to the age and gender distribution of the EU27 population (grey bars). In addition, mean and median age (years) and percentage of patients aged 65 years and older at RRT initiation are presented. Included are data from renal registries providing individual patient data (left panel) and aggregated data (right panel). The incidence data for Czech Republic, Slovakia and Turkey represent dialysis patients only.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 1 in 2011, unadjusted (black bars) and standardized to the age and gender distribution of the EU27 population (grey bars). In addition, mean and median age (years) and percentage of patients aged 65 years and older at RRT initiation are presented. Included are data from renal registries providing individual patient data (left panel) and aggregated data (right panel). The incidence data for Czech Republic, Slovakia and Turkey represent dialysis patients only. Table 1 summarizes the unadjusted incidence rate of RRT per million age-related population (pmarp) at Day 1 by age group. Particularly in the oldest age category of 75 years and older at the start of RRT, there was a huge variation in incidence rates, ranging from 191 pmarp in Finland to 907 pmarp in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium.
Table 1.

Incidence of RRT at Day 1 in 2011 by age group as pmarp and percent of patients, unadjusted

Country/region providing individual patient data0–19 years
20–44 years
45–64 years
65–74 years
75+ years
pmarp%pmarp%pmarp%pmarp%pmarp%
Austria9.3138.810152.131391.427527.331
Belgium
 Dutch-speakinga45.58147.623464.524907.146
 French-speakinga53.310226.631578.324813.935
Bosnia and Herzegovina8.0241.612191.940354.230497.816
Denmark5.1146.713135.933314.628386.824
Finland9.0234.013114.939245.828191.118
France7.4141.39153.927403.622648.840
Greece6.4140.67181.824563.927874.441
Iceland22.3662.821102.424381.824425.624
Norway9.6245.515130.133285.123383.827
Romania8.2152.116215.642395.826276.815
Serbia6.0156.713221.744406.926293.316
Spain
 Andalusia5.4137.613142.831415.429387.426
 Aragon4.1141.412134.129408.829308.629
 Asturias13.0135.38144.930409.028373.033
 Basque Country10.4242.113107.327356.130296.528
 Cantabriaa75.125163.442221.617176.617
 Castile and Leona37.410111.926307.425352.439
 Castile-La Manchaa33.713120.930392.532233.724
 Catalonia7.3142.213154.830396.025443.030
 Extremadura9.1238.313130.531271.622324.032
 Galicia15.9253.613170.132329.324345.830
 Valencian region14.8240.312167.632377.125463.329
Sweden7.8148.213149.431317.126406.328
The Netherlands6.7140.411135.932353.727473.828
UK, all countriesa52.717139.233300.025342.825
 Englanda53.817140.333303.625344.825
 Northern Irelanda46.514162.035354.626408.724
 Scotland10.2242.215125.536265.425276.922
 Walesa,b55.115133.431272.824382.430
All countries5.3146.012155.731369.525476.730

pmarp: per million age-related population.

aPatients <20 years of age are not reported.

bThe incidence of RRT is slightly underestimated, for details see the UK Renal Registry Report 2012.

Incidence of RRT at Day 1 in 2011 by age group as pmarp and percent of patients, unadjusted pmarp: per million age-related population. aPatients <20 years of age are not reported. bThe incidence of RRT is slightly underestimated, for details see the UK Renal Registry Report 2012. We performed a separate analysis for children treated with RRT based on data from a selection of registries. As the numbers of children starting RRT were low, we present the incidence for the years 2010 and 2011 combined (Table 2). A more detailed overview of paediatric RRT data in Europe can be found at www.espn-reg.org.
Table 2.

Incidence of RRT at Day 1 for the period 2010–11 among patients aged 0–19 years, by age group, as counts (N) and pmarp, unadjusted

CohortaAll 0–19 years0–4 years5–9 years10–14 years15–19 years
N (pmarp)N (pmarp)N (pmarp)N (pmarp)N (pmarp)
All countries626 (8.2)150 (7.9)71 (3.7)139 (7.4)266 (13.4)

pmarp: per million age-related population.

aBased on data from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Norway, Romania, Serbia, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Aragon), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Extremadura), Spain (Galicia), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands and UK (Scotland).

Incidence of RRT at Day 1 for the period 2010–11 among patients aged 0–19 years, by age group, as counts (N) and pmarp, unadjusted pmarp: per million age-related population. aBased on data from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Norway, Romania, Serbia, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Aragon), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Extremadura), Spain (Galicia), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands and UK (Scotland). Tables 3 and 4 present the incidence of the different treatment modalities including haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and (pre-emptive) renal transplantation at Day 91 after the start of RRT. Whereas the incidence rates of HD were highest in Turkey (194 pmp), Portugal (187 pmp) and Greece (170 pmp), the incidence rates of PD were highest in Sweden (34 pmp), Iceland (31 pmp) and Denmark (30 pmp). For patients living with a functioning graft at Day 91 of RRT, the highest incidence rates were observed in Norway (15 pmp) and the Netherlands, Spain, Catalonia and Iceland (for all 13 pmp).
Table 3.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 91 after the start of RRT in 2011 for countries and regions providing individual patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted

Country/regionAll (pmp)HD (pmp)PD (pmp)Tx (pmp)Unknown/missing (pmp)
Austria126.0109.312.83.80
Belgium
 Dutch-speakinga164.8144.416.93.50
 French-speakinga166.3141.717.84.91.9
Bosnia and Herzegovina107.7102.65.000
Denmark104.967.530.16.70.5
Finland82.860.522.10.20
France137.3114.415.76.60.6
Greece182.6169.612.50.60
Iceland103.459.631.312.50
Norway96.362.418.615.30
Romania104.594.87.91.80
Serbia132.3116.713.81.80
Spain
 Andalusia107.990.213.64.00
 Aragon115.794.217.83.70
 Asturias137.2100.229.97.10
 Basque Country108.777.728.32.70
 Cantabriaa104.565.728.610.10
 Castille and Leona116.090.522.72.70
 Castille-La Manchaa94.475.517.51.40
 Catalonia122.292.316.913.00
 Extremadura105.287.817.40.00
 Galicia137.7104.628.64.50
 Valencian region128.8104.221.72.90
Sweden108.865.934.08.90
The Netherlands108.476.118.913.30
UK, all countriesa100.670.921.87.90
 Englanda101.370.322.48.60
 Northern Irelanda104.580.717.56.30
 Scotland90.669.517.14.00
 Walesa,b108.980.224.14.60
All countries119.394.718.16.30.2

HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant.

aPatients <20 years of age are not reported.

bThe incidence of RRT is slightly underestimated, for details see the UK Renal Registry Report 2012.

Table 4.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 91 after the start of RRT in 2011 for countries providing aggregated patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted

CountryAll (pmp)HD (pmp)PD (pmp)Tx (pmp)Unknown/missing (pmp)
Albania70.866.52.51.80
Croatia132.1117.612.81.60
Czech Republica137.4128.88.60
Estonia60.435.817.27.50
France128.2110.011.96.30
FYR of Macedonia121.2120.70.50.00
Israel175.9157.712.06.20
Latvia86.578.58.00.00
Montenegro12.912.90.00.00
Portugalb209.8186.521.32.00
Slovakiaa127.3123.14.30
Slovenia105.399.94.90.50
Turkeya208.9194.314.70
All countries161.8146.412.64.60.0

HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant.

aData represent dialysis patients only.

bOnly pre-emptive transplantations (at Day 1) are included.

Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 91 after the start of RRT in 2011 for countries and regions providing individual patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant. aPatients <20 years of age are not reported. bThe incidence of RRT is slightly underestimated, for details see the UK Renal Registry Report 2012. Incidence of RRT pmp at Day 91 after the start of RRT in 2011 for countries providing aggregated patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant. aData represent dialysis patients only. bOnly pre-emptive transplantations (at Day 1) are included.

The prevalence of RRT for ESRD

On 31 December 2011, there were 425 824 RRT patients in all registries reporting to the ERA–EDTA Registry, corresponding to a prevalence of 692 pmp. As shown in Figure 3, the unadjusted prevalence of RRT pmp was highest in Portugal (1662 pmp), Belgium (French-speaking) (1271 pmp) and Spain, Catalonia (1203 pmp). On the other hand, Ukraine (131 pmp) and Russia (196 pmp) reported the lowest unadjusted prevalence. The prevalence of RRT standardized for the EU27 population was highest in Turkey (1335 pmp). On 31 December 2011, the overall mean age was 59.8 years among countries providing individual patient data and 56.9 years among countries providing aggregated data. The mean age ranged from 47.0 years in Albania to 65.4 years in Portugal. The mean percentage of prevalent patients aged 65 years and older in registries providing individual patient data was 41%, with a range from 30% in Serbia to 54% in Belgium (Dutch-speaking part) (Figure 3).
Fig. 3.

Prevalence of RRT pmp on 31 December 2011, unadjusted (black bars) and standardized to the age and gender distribution of the EU27 population (grey bars). In addition, mean and median age (years) are presented. Included are data from renal registries providing individual patient data (left panel) and aggregated data (right panel). The prevalence data for Czech Republic, Israel and Slovakia represent dialysis patients only. In Romania, the prevalence of RRT is underestimated by ∼3%, due to an estimated 30% underreporting of patients living with a functioning graft.

Prevalence of RRT pmp on 31 December 2011, unadjusted (black bars) and standardized to the age and gender distribution of the EU27 population (grey bars). In addition, mean and median age (years) are presented. Included are data from renal registries providing individual patient data (left panel) and aggregated data (right panel). The prevalence data for Czech Republic, Israel and Slovakia represent dialysis patients only. In Romania, the prevalence of RRT is underestimated by ∼3%, due to an estimated 30% underreporting of patients living with a functioning graft. Table 5 summarizes the unadjusted prevalence of RRT pmarp at 31 December 2011 by age group. Like for the incidence, the most pronounced variation in prevalence was observed in the highest age category (≥75 years), ranging from 918 pmp in Serbia to 4112 pmp in Dutch-speaking Belgium. The prevalence for the age group 0–19 years, averaged for 2010 and 2011, is presented in Table 6.
Table 5.

Prevalence of RRT on 31 December 2011 by age group as pmarp and percent of patients, unadjusted

Country/region providing individual patient data0–19 years
20–44 years
45–64 years
65–74 years
75+ years
pmarp%pmarp%pmarp%pmarp%pmarp%
Austria59.81448.5151527.0422556.4252081.117
Belgium
 Dutch-speakinga421.1111459.0342945.6234060.631
 French-speakinga513.3141844.5383666.6224111.626
Bosnia and Herzegovina25.11344.4171259.4451605.3232429.713
Denmark63.72539.3201316.7411851.8221787.615
Finland99.33401.1161278.1451945.5231273.813
France44.61513.5151550.3382676.3212978.525
Greece49.91430.4141432.8342755.7253059.627
Iceland78.13493.4261011.0372004.6201543.014
Norway67.42491.5191415.7412357.5221930.416
Romania28.01325.3211118.2441616.5221193.013
Serbia23.21427.6201252.1491620.220917.510
Spain
 Andalusia49.41505.2191668.0402868.5222465.818
 Aragon32.61437.1151612.6402521.1212101.023
 Asturias45.41467.6151408.0402216.0211923.823
 Basque Country83.51500.2161567.8402805.1242049.019
 Cantabria431.6161440.6422558.0231701.319
 Castile and Leona418.4141481.8392131.7202093.627
 Castile-La Manchaa425.0161583.4382992.9232193.722
 Cataloniaa65.61488.0161815.2383353.3233220.123
 Extremadura31.71501.0171667.7422266.8192071.821
 Galicia43.31537.2161679.1382651.5232112.422
 Valencian region70.21455.0151717.8383007.7233178.723
Sweden70.62465.7161507.2412210.5241786.016
The Netherlands63.02497.6181335.1412275.8222235.317
UK, all countriesa563.7221412.9421912.7201699.616
 Englanda560.8221423.2421937.9201701.716
 Northern Irelanda545.5221375.5392222.9212252.318
 Scotland72.42589.9231340.8431636.1181445.113
 Walesa582.2201390.3411814.5201810.918
All countries34.61484.6181450.4402308.8222283.420

pmarp; per million age-related population.

aPatients <20 years of age are not reported.

Table 6.

Prevalence of RRT on 31 December 2011 among patients aged 0–19 years, by age group, as counts (N) and pmarp, unadjusted

CohortaAll 0–19 years0–4 years5–9 years10–14 years15–19 years
N (pmarp)N (pmarp)N (pmarp)N (pmarp)N (pmarp)
All countries2111 (52.8)206 (20.9)321 (32.3)565 (57.4)1019 (98.9)

pmarp; per million age-related population.

aBased on data from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Norway, Romania, Serbia, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Aragon), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Extremadura), Spain (Galicia), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands and UK (Scotland).

Prevalence of RRT on 31 December 2011 by age group as pmarp and percent of patients, unadjusted pmarp; per million age-related population. aPatients <20 years of age are not reported. Prevalence of RRT on 31 December 2011 among patients aged 0–19 years, by age group, as counts (N) and pmarp, unadjusted pmarp; per million age-related population. aBased on data from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Norway, Romania, Serbia, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Aragon), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Extremadura), Spain (Galicia), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands and UK (Scotland). Tables 7 and 8 show that the prevalence of HD on 31 December 2011 was highest in Portugal (986 pmp) and Greece (819 pmp) and lowest in Ukraine (98 pmp), Montenegro (137 pmp) and Russia (141 pmp). For PD, the prevalence was highest in Spain, Galicia (102 pmp) and Spain, Basque Country (94 pmp), whereas the lowest prevalence of this treatment modality was reported in Montenegro (9.7 pmp) and FYR of Macedonia and Russia (both 13 pmp). Finally, the prevalence of patients living with a functioning graft was highest in Spain, Basque Country (645 pmp), Spain, Catalonia (636 pmp) and Norway (629 pmp).
Table 7.

Prevalence of RRT pmp on 31 December 2011 for countries and regions providing individual patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted

Country/regionAll (pmp)HD (pmp)PD (pmp)Tx (pmp)Unknown/missing (pmp)
Austria1001.5458.942.3500.30.0
Belgium
 Dutch-speakinga1184.4631.162.3491.10.0
 French-speakinga1271.0674.461.3531.04.3
Bosnia and Herzegovina705.0632.026.246.50.3
Denmark850.5358.689.4398.63.9
Finland802.7267.861.1473.80.0
France1085.5572.343.2462.27.7
Greece1103.1818.763.8220.50.0
Iceland664.5203.850.2410.60.0
Norway874.0207.737.6628.70.0
Romania624.1506.570.447.00.2
Serbia726.7567.557.0101.70.6
Spain
 Andalusia1024.2470.444.0509.70.1
 Aragon1038.7422.140.1576.50.0
 Asturias1037.5387.462.9587.20.0
 Basque Country1102.9364.193.7645.10.0
 Cantabria948.6323.574.1545.95.1
 Castille and Leona1028.5426.769.7522.39.8
 Castille-La Manchaa985.5404.050.0526.84.7
 Cataloniaa1202.6519.147.1636.40.0
 Extremadura1024.6505.158.6460.90.0
 Galicia1178.4531.1101.5545.80.0
 Valencian region1150.0629.457.3463.30.0
Sweden929.9323.287.1519.60.0
The Netherlands911.2324.160.7526.40.1
UK, all countriesa857.7375.362.3419.70.3
 Englanda859.1376.263.8418.70.4
 Northern Irelanda850.7412.445.3393.00.0
 Scotland841.6360.750.3430.60.0
 Walesa892.8367.270.8454.50.3
All countries946.6473.358.2413.12.0

HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant.

aPatients <20 years of age are not reported.

Table 8.

Prevalence of RRT pmp on 31 December 2011 for countries providing aggregated patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted

CountryAll (pmp)HD (pmp)PD (pmp)Tx (pmp)Unknown/missing (pmp)
Albania284.0194.615.474.00.0
Croatia1013.5615.450.6347.50.0
Czech Republica590.0541.049.0
Estonia532.8179.151.5302.20.0
France1094.8569.540.5484.80.0
FYR Macedonia758.2674.612.970.70.0
Israela730.7687.643.10.0
Latvia517.8195.346.4276.10.0
Montenegro274.2137.19.7127.40.0
Poland706.7438.427.7240.60.0
Portugal1661.9985.566.7609.70.0
Russia195.7141.312.941.50.0
Slovakiaa574.9557.717.20.0
Slovenia980.0656.429.2294.30.0
Spain1078.0480.456.8537.53.3
Turkeyb868.2709.563.395.40.0
Ukrainec130.897.716.017.20.0
All countries623.8392.733.4206.60.4

HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant.

aData represent dialysis patients only.

bThe number of patients living with a functioning graft is underestimated.

cData do not include Kiev city.

Prevalence of RRT pmp on 31 December 2011 for countries and regions providing individual patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant. aPatients <20 years of age are not reported. Prevalence of RRT pmp on 31 December 2011 for countries providing aggregated patient data, by treatment modality, unadjusted HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; Tx, renal transplant. aData represent dialysis patients only. bThe number of patients living with a functioning graft is underestimated. cData do not include Kiev city.

Renal transplants performed

The overall number of renal transplants performed in 2011 among all registries reporting to the ERA–EDTA Registry was 22 814 (37 pmp). Of those, a total of 16 118 (26 pmp) renal transplants were performed using deceased donor kidneys, 6 059 (9.9 pmp) using a living donor kidneys and for 637 (1.0 pmp) transplants the donor type was unknown. Tables 9 and 10 report that the highest overall transplant rates were reported from Spain, Cantabria (81 pmp) and Spain, Catalonia (77 pmp). Rates of living donor kidney transplants were highest in Turkey (39 pmp), Iceland (35 pmp), the Netherlands and UK, Northern Ireland (both 26 pmp).
Table 9.

Renal transplants performed pmp in 2011 for countries and regions providing individual patient data, by donor type, unadjusted

Country/regionAll (pmp)Living donor (pmp)Deceased donor (pmp)Unknown donor type (pmp)
Austria44.65.539.20
Belgium
 Dutch-speakinga39.73.036.50.2
 French-speakinga44.63.640.70.2
Bosnia and Herzegovina6.34.61.70
Denmark41.415.823.12.5
Finland32.72.430.30
France43.63.440.10.1
Greece17.84.613.20
Iceland34.534.500
Norway61.014.746.20
Romaniab8.13.03.71.4
Serbia15.66.19.50
Spain
 Andalusia49.949.9
 Aragon57.96.751.20
 Asturias49.98.341.60
 Basque Country55.3055.30
 Cantabria80.910.170.80
 Castille and Leona40.4040.40
 Castille-La Manchaa38.738.7
 Cataloniaa76.818.758.10
 Extremadura46.92.741.52.7
 Galicia53.18.644.50
 Valencian region37.51.636.00
Sweden45.219.525.70
The Netherlands51.626.425.20
UK, all countriesa43.716.427.30
 Englanda43.916.727.00
 Northern Irelanda63.026.037.00
 Scotland32.210.122.10
 Walesa48.612.636.10
All countries41.59.829.52.2

We used data from NHS Blood and Transplant Service for UK.

aPatients <20 years of age are not reported.

bThe transplantation activity reflects 70% of the total transplantation activity in the country, because there is underreporting of pre-emptive transplants.

Table 10.

Renal transplants performed pmp in 2011 for countries providing aggregated patient data, by donor type, unadjusted

CountryAll (pmp)Living donor (pmp)Deceased donor (pmp)Unknown donor type (pmp)
Albania3.93.90.00.0
Croatia53.77.543.62.6
Czech Republic31.93.828.10.0
Estonia32.82.230.60.0
France46.34.741.60.0
FYR of Macedonia3.03.00.00.0
Israel52.416.526.89.1
Latvia36.11.734.40.0
Montenegro3.20.03.20.0
Poland27.01.026.00.0
Portugal50.24.445.70.0
Russia6.81.35.60.0
Slovakia23.92.421.50.0
Slovenia22.40.022.40.0
Spain52.96.646.30.0
Turkey47.539.28.40.0
Ukrainea1.40.80.60.0
All countries27.58.019.30.2

We used data from the Slovak Centre of Organ Transplantation, the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT) and the Turkish Ministry of Health, for Slovakia, Spain and Turkey, respectively.

aData do not include Kiev city.

Renal transplants performed pmp in 2011 for countries and regions providing individual patient data, by donor type, unadjusted We used data from NHS Blood and Transplant Service for UK. aPatients <20 years of age are not reported. bThe transplantation activity reflects 70% of the total transplantation activity in the country, because there is underreporting of pre-emptive transplants. Renal transplants performed pmp in 2011 for countries providing aggregated patient data, by donor type, unadjusted We used data from the Slovak Centre of Organ Transplantation, the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT) and the Turkish Ministry of Health, for Slovakia, Spain and Turkey, respectively. aData do not include Kiev city.

Patient and graft survival

Survival analysis was performed using the data from 22 registries in 12 countries that provided individual patient records for the period from 2002 to 2009. The results of the unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses for all countries combined for all patients and for those aged 65 years and older are presented in Figure 4 and Table 11. The adjusted analyses for the total group of patients used fixed values for age, gender and distribution of primary renal disease, while the adjusted analyses in the group of patients ≥65 years were not adjusted for age. A more detailed description of the methods used for the survival analyses can be found in the Appendix.
Fig. 4.

Survival of incident dialysis patients and patients receiving a first renal transplant (between 2002 and 2006), from Day 91, by modality, adjusted for age, gender and primary diagnosis.

Table 11.

Unadjusted and adjusted 1-, 2- and 5-year survival probabilities (95% confidence interval) from the first day of RRT for patients who started RRT between 2002 and 2006 and 1- and 2-year survival probabilities for patients who started RRT between 2005 and 2009

 Cohort 2002–06a
Cohort 2005–09b
1 year2 years5 years1 year2 years
Patient survival on RRT
 All patients
  Unadjusted81.1 (80.9–81.3)69.8 (69.6–70.0)46.8 (46.6–47.0)82.7 (82.5–82.9)72.0 (71.8–72.2)
  Adjusted88.3 (88.1–88.5)79.9 (79.7–80.2)58.6 (58.2–59.0)89.3 (89.1–89.5)81.6 (81.3–81.9)
 65+ years
  Unadjusted73.2 (72.9–73.5)57.7 (57.5–58.0)28.0 (27.9–28.1)75.3 (75.0–75.6)60.7 (60.5–60.9)
  Adjusted74.9 (74.5–75.2)59.8 (59.4–60.3)29.8 (29.4–30.3)76.9 (76.5–77.2)62.7 (62.3–63.1)
Patient survival on dialysis
 All patients
  Unadjusted80.4 (80.2–80.6)67.8 (67.6–68.0)39.3 (39.2–39.4)81.8 (81.6–82.0)69.8 (69.6–70.1)
  Adjusted86.5 (86.2–86.7)76.9 (76.5–77.2)51.6 (51.1–52.1)88.0 (87.8–88.2)79.2 (78.9–79.5)
 65+ years
  Unadjusted73.1 (72.8–73.4)57.4 (57.2–57.7)26.8 (26.7–26.9)75.1 (74.9–75.4)60.3 (60.0–60.5)
  Adjusted74.5 (74.1–74.9)59.2 (58.7–59.6)28.1 (27.7–28.6)76.6 (76.2–76.9)62.1 (61.7–62.5)
Patient survival after first transplant (deceased donor)
 All patients
  Unadjusted95.5 (95.1–95.8)93.5 (93.1–93.9)86.7 (86.2–87.2)95.9 (95.6–96.1)93.8 (93.5–94.2)
  Adjusted97.2 (96.9–97.4)95.9 (95.6–96.2)91.3 (90.8–91.8)97.3 (97.0–97.5)95.9 (95.6–96.2)
 65+ years
  Unadjusted88.0 (86.4–89.4)83.6 (81.9–85.1)69.3 (67.6–70.9)90.3 (89.0–91.5)85.8 (84.3–87.1)
  Adjusted89.1 (87.5–90.7)85.1 (83.3–86.9)71.7 (69.4–74.0)91.3 (90.0–92.6)87.2 (85.6–88.7)
Patient survival after first transplant (living donor)
 All patients
  Unadjusted98.0 (97.5–98.4)97.1 (96.5–97.5)94.3 (93.6–95.0)98.2 (97.9–98.5)97.4 (96.9–97.7)
  Adjusted98.2 (97.8–98.6)97.4 (96.9–97.9)94.8 (94.1–95.6)98.6 (98.3–98.9)98.0 (97.6–98.4)
 65+ years
  Unadjusted93.8 (89.7–96.3)90.2 (85.7–93.4)80.9 (76.0–85.0)94.6 (92.0–96.4)91.7 (88.7–93.9)
  Adjusted95.2 (92.2–98.2)93.2 (89.8–96.7)84.8 (79.9–90.0)95.5 (93.5–97.6)93.5 (91.1–96.0)
Graft survival after first transplant (deceased donor)
 All patients
  Unadjusted89.8 (89.3–90.2)86.8 (86.3–87.3)77.2 (76.7–77.8)90.4 (90.0–90.8)87.3 (86.9–87.8)
  Adjusted91.0 (90.5–91.4)88.3 (87.8–88.9)79.6 (78.9–80.3)91.4 (91.0–91.9)88.7 (88.2–89.2)
 65+ years
  Unadjusted81.1 (79.4–82.7)76.3 (74.6–78.0)61.4 (59.8–62.9)84.0 (82.5–85.4)79.4 (77.9–80.9)
  Adjusted82.0 (80.1–84.0)77.4 (75.3–79.6)62.9 (60.4–65.5)84.6 (82.9–86.3)80.2 (78.3–82.1)
Graft survival after first transplant (living donor)
 All patients
  Unadjusted94.7 (94.0–95.3)92.9 (92.1–93.6)86.9 (85.9–87.7)95.4 (94.8–95.8)93.5 (92.9–94.1)
  Adjusted94.5 (93.8–95.3)92.7 (91.9–93.6)86.6 (85.5–87.7)95.3 (94.8–95.9)93.5 (92.9–94.2)
 65+ years
  Unadjusted90.2 (85.7–93.4)85.6 (80.7–89.3)77.8 (72.9–82.0)92.5 (89.6–94.6)89.2 (86.1–91.7)
  Adjusted91.3 (87.4–95.4)88.2 (83.7–92.9)80.9 (75.5–86.7)93.2 (90.7–95.8)90.7 (87.8–93.6)

aThese analyses were based on data from Austria, Belgium (Dutch-speaking), Belgium (French-speaking), Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Italy (Calabria), Norway, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Cantabria), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands, UK (England/Wales) and UK (Scotland).

bThese analyses were based on data from Austria, Belgium (Dutch-speaking), Belgium (French-speaking), Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Italy (Calabria), Norway, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Cantabria), Spain (Castile-La Mancha), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Extremadura), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands, UK (England/Wales), UK (Northern Ireland) and UK (Scotland).

Unadjusted and adjusted 1-, 2- and 5-year survival probabilities (95% confidence interval) from the first day of RRT for patients who started RRT between 2002 and 2006 and 1- and 2-year survival probabilities for patients who started RRT between 2005 and 2009 aThese analyses were based on data from Austria, Belgium (Dutch-speaking), Belgium (French-speaking), Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Italy (Calabria), Norway, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Cantabria), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands, UK (England/Wales) and UK (Scotland). bThese analyses were based on data from Austria, Belgium (Dutch-speaking), Belgium (French-speaking), Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Italy (Calabria), Norway, Spain (Andalusia), Spain (Asturias), Spain (Basque Country), Spain (Cantabria), Spain (Castile-La Mancha), Spain (Catalonia), Spain (Extremadura), Spain (Valencian region), Sweden, the Netherlands, UK (England/Wales), UK (Northern Ireland) and UK (Scotland). Survival of incident dialysis patients and patients receiving a first renal transplant (between 2002 and 2006), from Day 91, by modality, adjusted for age, gender and primary diagnosis. For the calculation of the expected remaining lifetimes, we used data from 18 national and regional renal registries in 11 countries that provided individual patient records for the period from 2000 to 2011. As is illustrated in Figure 5, the expected remaining lifetime for patients on RRT is much lower than for the general population. Particularly, the expected remaining lifetime of dialysis patients is strongly reduced when compared with that of transplant recipients, and it represents approximately one-third of the expected remaining lifetime of the general population. In addition to the RRT modality, age plays an important role: with a higher age, the reduction in expected remaining lifetime is less pronounced. In other words, the younger a patient the greater the reduction in expected remaining lifetime.
Fig. 5.

Expected remaining lifetimes of prevalent dialysis and renal transplant patients in 2010 and 2011 compared with the 2005 general population statistics.

Expected remaining lifetimes of prevalent dialysis and renal transplant patients in 2010 and 2011 compared with the 2005 general population statistics.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.
  11 in total

Review 1.  The Long Road to the Development of Effective Therapies for the Short Gut Syndrome: A Personal Perspective.

Authors:  Palle Bekker Jeppesen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Diabetes and disordered bone metabolism (diabetic osteodystrophy): time for recognition.

Authors:  S Epstein; G Defeudis; S Manfrini; N Napoli; P Pozzilli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  End-stage renal disease and survival in people with diabetes: a national database linkage study.

Authors:  S Bell; E H Fletcher; I Brady; H C Looker; D Levin; N Joss; J P Traynor; W Metcalfe; B Conway; S Livingstone; G Leese; S Philip; S Wild; N Halbesma; N Sattar; R S Lindsay; J McKnight; D Pearson; H M Colhoun
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2014-08-19

4.  2012 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report: cautious optimism on outcomes, concern about persistent inequalities and data black-outs.

Authors:  Liliana Gonzalez-Espinoza; Alberto Ortiz
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-05-21

5.  External Validation of a risk stratification model to assist shared decision making for patients starting renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Peeters; Wim Van Biesen; Nic Veys; Wim Lemahieu; Bart De Moor; Johan De Meester
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  The European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry Annual Report 2014: a summary.

Authors:  Maria Pippias; Anneke Kramer; Marlies Noordzij; Nikolaos Afentakis; Ramón Alonso de la Torre; Patrice M Ambühl; Manuel I Aparicio Madre; Felipe Arribas Monzón; Anders Åsberg; Marjolein Bonthuis; Encarnación Bouzas Caamaño; Ivan Bubic; Fergus J Caskey; Pablo Castro de la Nuez; Harijs Cernevskis; Maria de Los Ángeles Garcia Bazaga; Jean-Marin des Grottes; Raquel Fernández González; Manuel Ferrer-Alamar; Patrik Finne; Liliana Garneata; Eliezer Golan; James G Heaf; Marc H Hemmelder; Alma Idrizi; Kyriakos Ioannou; Faical Jarraya; Nino Kantaria; Mykola Kolesnyk; Reinhard Kramar; Mathilde Lassalle; Visnja V Lezaic; Frantisek Lopot; Fernando Macario; Ángela Magaz; Angel L Martín de Francisco; Eduardo Martín Escobar; Alberto Martínez Castelao; Wendy Metcalfe; Inmaculada Moreno Alia; Maurizio Nordio; Mai Ots-Rosenberg; Runolfur Palsson; Marina Ratkovic; Halima Resic; Boleslaw Rutkowski; Carmen Santiuste de Pablos; Nurhan Seyahi; María Fernanda Slon Roblero; Viera Spustova; Koenraad J F Stas; María E Stendahl; Olivera Stojceva-Taneva; Evgueniy Vazelov; Edita Ziginskiene; Ziad Massy; Kitty J Jager; Vianda S Stel
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-01-16

7.  Current trends in European renal epidemiology.

Authors:  James Heaf
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-02-18

8.  Subtotal parathyroidectomy for secondary renal hyperparathyroidism: a 20-year surgical outcome study.

Authors:  Aleksander Konturek; Marcin Barczyński; Małgorzata Stopa; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  The Need for New Donor Stratification to Predict Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Shin Seok Yang; Jaeseok Yang; Curie Ahn; Sang Il Min; Jongwon Ha; Sung Joo Kim; Jae Berm Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Reciprocating living kidney donor generosity: tax credits, health insurance and an outcomes registry.

Authors:  Shivam Joshi; Sheela Joshi; Warren Kupin
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.