| Literature DB >> 25852825 |
Rhea M May1, Chelsea M Magin1, Ethan E Mann1, Michael C Drinker1, John C Fraser1, Christopher A Siedlecki2, Anthony B Brennan3, Shravanthi T Reddy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) are common complications of central venous catheters (CVC), which are used to monitor patient health and deliver medications. CVCs are subject to protein adsorption and platelet adhesion as well as colonization by the natural skin flora (i.e. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis). Antimicrobial and antithrombotic drugs can prevent infections and thrombosis-related complications, but have associated resistance and safety risks. Surface topographies have shown promise in limiting platelet and bacterial adhesion, so it was hypothesized that an engineered Sharklet micropattern, inspired by shark-skin, may provide a combined approach as it has wide reaching anti-fouling capabilities. To assess the feasibility for this micropattern to improve CVC-related healthcare outcomes, bacterial colonization and platelet interactions were analyzed in vitro on a material common for vascular access devices.Entities:
Keywords: Blood compatibility; CRBSI; CRT; Infection; Microtopography; Platelet activation; Sharklet
Year: 2015 PMID: 25852825 PMCID: PMC4385044 DOI: 10.1186/s40169-015-0050-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Med ISSN: 2001-1326
Figure 1Confocal microscopy images of a) unpatterned controls b)-3SK2x2 and c) +3SK2x2 Sharklet micropatterns replicated in TPU. Representative images of the surfaces analyzed in this study. Scale bar, 20 μm.
The Sharklet micropattern reduces bacterial colonization after blood protein treatment LD: ANOVA determination of Average LogCFU/50 mm2; SEM: Standard error of the Mean; Conditions that share the same statistical group are not significantly different with p > 0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus ATCC 6538 | Static | 1 | Saline | 4.05 (0.17) | 3.17 (0.20) | 94% | 0.001 | A |
| A | ||||||||
| Whole Blood | 3.82 (0.13) | 3.37 (0.16) | 83% | 0.003 | ||||
| 18 | Saline | 4.91 (0.25) | 3.91 (0.21) | 89% | 0.019 | A | ||
| Whole Blood | 3.71 (0.29) | 3.23 (0.31) | 70% | 0.048 | A | |||
| Dynamic | 1 | Saline | 5.23 (0.22) | 4.79 (0.16) | 64% | 0.128 | A | |
| Whole Blood | 4.5 (0.21) | 3.9 (0.37) | 74% | 0.128 | A | |||
| 18 | Saline | 5.66 (0.1) | 4.82 (0.19) | 85% | 0.008 | A | ||
| Whole Blood | 4.49 (0.17) | 4.06 (0.23) | 63% | 0.032 | A | |||
| S. epidermidis ATCC 35984 | Static | 1 | Saline | 5.04 (0.09) | 4.23 (0.15) | 84% | 0.065 | A |
| 25% Serum | 3.68 (0.08) | 3.24 (0.12) | 64% | 0.005 | A | |||
| 18 | Saline | 5.06 (0.1) | 3.92 (0.1) | 91% | 0.001 | A | ||
| 25% Serum | 3.84 (0.09) | 3.47 (0.12) | 71% | 0.003 | A |
Figure 2The Sharklet micropattern reduces the colonization of two common CRBSI-associated pathogens after preconditioning with whole blood. Representative images of unpatterned, +3SK2x2 and-3SK2x2 TPU surfaces colonized for 18 h with S. epidermidis (top panels) and S. aureus (bottom panels). These qualitative images support the quantitative results in Table 1. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Figure 3The Sharklet micropattern reduces platelet adhesion. Representative images of immunostained platelets on (a) unpatterned, (b) +3SK2x2 and (c) -3SK2x2 TPU surfaces. Quantification of fluorescent images revealed that both Sharklet micropatterns significantly reduce platelet area coverage compared to unpatterned controls. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Figure 4The Sharklet micropattern reduces fibrin sheath formation resulting from platelet activation. Representative images of immunostained fibrinogen on (a) unpatterned, (b) +3SK2x2 and (c) -3SK2x2 TPU surfaces. Quantification of fluorescent images revealed that both Sharklet micropatterns significantly reduce fibrinogen area coverage compared to unpatterned controls. Scale bar, 50 μm.