| Literature DB >> 25852659 |
Kerianne M Dobosz1, Kristopher W Kolewe1, Jessica D Schiffman1.
Abstract
Numerous engineered and natural environments suffer deleterious effects from biofouling and/or biofilm formation. For instance, bacterial contamination on biomedical devices pose serious health concerns. In membrane-based technologies, such as desalination and wastewater reuse, biofouling decreases membrane lifetime, and increases the energy required to produce clean water. Traditionally, approaches have combatted bacteria using bactericidal agents. However, due to globalization, a decline in antibiotic discovery, and the widespread resistance of microbes to many commercial antibiotics and metallic nanoparticles, new materials, and approaches to reduce biofilm formation are needed. In this mini-review, we cover the recent strategies that have been explored to combat microbial contamination without exerting evolutionary pressure on microorganisms. Renewable feedstocks, relying on structure-property relationships, bioinspired/nature-derived compounds, and green processing methods are discussed. Greener strategies that mitigate biofouling hold great potential to positively impact human health and safety.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; antifouling; biofouling; drug development; green chemistry; resistance genes
Year: 2015 PMID: 25852659 PMCID: PMC4362328 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Microorganisms respond to surface topography. Schematics of the topographies are provided, as well as highlighted examples with figures reprinted (adapted) with permission from the American Chemical Society. The dimensions given include length (l), width (w), height (h), diameter (d), and interspatial spacing (s). All substrates are polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) except for the parallel fibers.
This table highlights recent publications that have investigated green modifications to microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis membranes.
| Modification(s) and Membrane | Effect(s) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Capsaicin derivatives blended into membrane body or surface modification on UF PSF membranes. | Increased water flux in blended membrane, increased flux, antifouling and antibacterial properties when challenged by humic acid. | |
| Increased hydrophilicity, flux, and fouling resistance ratio when challenged with bovine serum albumin (BSA). | ||
| δ-Gluconolactone surface modification on chloromethylated UF PSf membranes. | Increased human serum albumin rejection from 84 ± 1% to 96 ± 1%. Increased pure water flux resistance by 14%. | |
| Lysozyme surface modification on PA RO membranes. | Increased water flux resistance, antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, and antifouling properties. | |
| Myoglobin surface modification on UF polyethersulfone membranes. | Increased hydrophilicity and increased lysozyme rejection by up to 21.43%. | |
| PDA surface modification on MF PVDF membranes. | Increased organic rejection. Flux persisted from pristine to modified membrane. | |
| PDA, PDA-graft-PEG, and PDA co-polymers surface modification on UF PSf membranes. | Increased antifouling efficiency and increased flux transmembrane pressure when challenged with soybean emulsions, BSA, and oil. | |
| PDA surface modification on thin-film composite RO membranes. | Increased pure water resistance with increasing PDA. Increased flux during oil/water separations. |