Literature DB >> 25852225

Osteogenic potential of sorted equine mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations.

Catherine L Radtke1, Rodolfo Nino-Fong1, Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte1, Blanca P Esparza Gonzalez1, Henrik Stryhn1, Laurie A McDuffee1.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to use non-equilibrium gravitational field-flow fractionation (GrFFF), an immunotag-less method of sorting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), to sort equine muscle tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MMSCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) into subpopulations and to carry out assays in order to compare their osteogenic capabilities. Cells from 1 young adult horse were isolated from left semitendinosus muscle tissue and from bone marrow aspirates of the fourth and fifth sternebrae. Aliquots of 800 × 10(3) MSCs from each tissue source were sorted into 5 fractions using non-equilibrium GrFFF (GrFFF proprietary system). Pooled fractions were cultured and expanded for use in osteogenic assays, including flow cytometry, histochemistry, bone nodule assays, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for gene expression of osteocalcin (OCN), RUNX2, and osterix. Equine MMSCs and BMSCs were consistently sorted into 5 fractions that remained viable for use in further osteogenic assays. Statistical analysis confirmed strongly significant upregulation of OCN, RUNX2, and osterix for the BMSC fraction 4 with P < 0.00001. Flow cytometry revealed different cell size and granularity for BMSC fraction 4 and MMSC fraction 2 compared to unsorted controls and other fractions. Histochemisty and bone nodule assays revealed positive staining nodules without differences in average nodule area, perimeter, or stain intensity between tissues or fractions. As there are different subpopulations of MSCs with different osteogenic capacities within equine muscle- and bone marrow-derived sources, these differences must be taken into account when using equine stem cell therapy to induce bone healing in veterinary medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25852225      PMCID: PMC4365701     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  43 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Flow cytometric characterization of culture expanded multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from horse adipose tissue: towards the definition of minimal stemness criteria.

Authors:  L Pascucci; G Curina; F Mercati; C Marini; C Dall'Aglio; B Paternesi; P Ceccarelli
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.046

3.  Marrow-derived progenitor cell injections enhance new bone formation during distraction.

Authors:  M Richards; B A Huibregtse; A I Caplan; J A Goulet; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Field-flow fractionation in bioanalysis: A review of recent trends.

Authors:  Barbara Roda; Andrea Zattoni; Pierluigi Reschiglian; Myeong Hee Moon; Mara Mirasoli; Elisa Michelini; Aldo Roda
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Gravitational field-flow fractionation of human hemopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Barbara Roda; Pierluigi Reschiglian; Francesco Alviano; Giacomo Lanzoni; Gian Paolo Bagnara; Francesca Ricci; Marina Buzzi; Pier Luigi Tazzari; Pasqualepaolo Pagliaro; Elisa Michelini; Aldo Roda
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Scaffold effects on osteogenic differentiation of equine mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Rodolfo Nino-Fong; Laurie A McDuffee; Blanca P Esparza Gonzalez; M Ramesh Kumar; Erika F Merschrod S; Kristin M Poduska
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.979

7.  Evaluation of the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacities of equine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Julian Braun; Anita Hack; Michaela Weis-Klemm; Sabine Conrad; Sabrina Treml; Konrad Kohler; Ulrich Walliser; Thomas Skutella; Wilhelm K Aicher
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 8.  Markers of stemness in equine mesenchymal stem cells: a plea for uniformity.

Authors:  Catharina De Schauwer; Evelyne Meyer; Gerlinde R Van de Walle; Ann Van Soom
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Application of a novel sorting system for equine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).

Authors:  Catherine L Radtke; Rodolfo Nino-Fong; Blanca P Esparza Gonzalez; Laurie A McDuffee
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 10.  Mesenchymal stromal cells. Biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation.

Authors:  Catherine M Kolf; Elizabeth Cho; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development of a biologically immortalized equine stem cell line.

Authors:  Rodolfo Nino-Fong; Blanca P Esparza Gonzalez; Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte; William Montelpare; Laurie McDuffee
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Ultrastructural analysis of different human mesenchymal stem cells after in vitro expansion: a technical review.

Authors:  M Miko; L Danišovič; A Majidi; I Varga
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Cardiomyogenic Heterogeneity of Clonal Subpopulations of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar Tripathy; Syed Husain Mustafa Rizvi; Saurabh Pratap Singh; Venkata Naga Srikanth Garikpati; Soniya Nityanand
Journal:  J Stem Cells Regen Med       Date:  2018-05-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.