OBJECTIVES: To determine whether frail elderly adults are at greater risk of fracture after a ground-level fall (GLF) than those who are not frail. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: All elderly (≥65) adults presenting after a GLF over 1 year (N = 110; mean age ± SD 79.5 ± 8.3, 54% male). MEASUREMENT: A Frailty Index (FI) was calculated using 50 preadmission frailty variables. Participants with a FI of 0.25 or greater were considered to be frail. The primary outcome measure was a new fracture; 40.1% (n = 45) of participants presented with a new fracture. The secondary outcome was discharge to an institutional facility (rehabilitation center or skilled nursing facility). Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Forty-three (38.2%) participants were frail. The median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range 9-17), and the mean FI was 0.20 ± 0.12. Frail participants were more likely than those who were not frail to have fractures (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.3, P = .01). Thirty-six (32.7%) participants were discharged to an institutional facility. Frail participants were more likely to be discharged to an institutional facility (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.08-3.09, P = .03) after a GLF. CONCLUSION: Frail individuals have a higher likelihood of fractures and discharge to an institutional facility after a GLF than those who are not frail. The FI may be used as an adjunct for decision-making when developing a discharge plan for an elderly adult after a GLF.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether frail elderly adults are at greater risk of fracture after a ground-level fall (GLF) than those who are not frail. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: All elderly (≥65) adults presenting after a GLF over 1 year (N = 110; mean age ± SD 79.5 ± 8.3, 54% male). MEASUREMENT: A Frailty Index (FI) was calculated using 50 preadmission frailty variables. Participants with a FI of 0.25 or greater were considered to be frail. The primary outcome measure was a new fracture; 40.1% (n = 45) of participants presented with a new fracture. The secondary outcome was discharge to an institutional facility (rehabilitation center or skilled nursing facility). Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Forty-three (38.2%) participants were frail. The median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range 9-17), and the mean FI was 0.20 ± 0.12. Frail participants were more likely than those who were not frail to have fractures (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.3, P = .01). Thirty-six (32.7%) participants were discharged to an institutional facility. Frail participants were more likely to be discharged to an institutional facility (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.08-3.09, P = .03) after a GLF. CONCLUSION: Frail individuals have a higher likelihood of fractures and discharge to an institutional facility after a GLF than those who are not frail. The FI may be used as an adjunct for decision-making when developing a discharge plan for an elderly adult after a GLF.
Authors: Elizabeth J Lilley; Katherine C Lee; John W Scott; Nicole J Krumrei; Adil H Haider; Ali Salim; Rajan Gupta; Zara Cooper Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Jeremy D Walston; Nathan E Brummel; Stacie Deiner; Charles H Brown; Maura Kennedy; Arti Hurria Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: David B Hogan; Colleen J Maxwell; Jonathan Afilalo; Rakesh C Arora; Sean M Bagshaw; Jenny Basran; Howard Bergman; Susan E Bronskill; Caitlin A Carter; Elijah Dixon; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Kenneth Madden; Arnold Mitnitski; Darryl Rolfson; Henry T Stelfox; Helen Tam-Tham; Hannah Wunsch Journal: Can Geriatr J Date: 2017-03-31
Authors: Leonie de Munter; Nancy C W Ter Bogt; Suzanne Polinder; Charlie A Sewalt; Ewout W Steyerberg; Mariska A C de Jongh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander T Janke; Snigdha Jain; Ula Hwang; Mark Rosenberg; Kevin Biese; Sandra Schneider; Pawan Goyal; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Manoj R Somagutta; Utkarsha Uday; Narayana R Bathula; Siva Pendyala; Ashwini Mahadevaiah; Molly S Jain; Greta Mahmutaj; Mohamed Gad; Jennifer Jean Baptiste Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-03-19
Authors: Vanessa Fillion; Marie-Josée Sirois; Philippe Gamache; Jason Robert Guertin; Suzanne N Morin; Sonia Jean Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.655