Literature DB >> 25851612

Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review.

M Morlando1, L Ferrara2, F D'Antonio1, A Lawin-O'Brien2, S Sankaran3, D Pasupathy3,4, A Khalil1, A Papageorghiou1, P Kyle3, C Lees2, B Thilaganathan1, A Bhide1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In trichorionic pregnancies, fetal reduction from three to two lowers the risk of severe preterm delivery, but provides no advantage in survival. Similar data for dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets is not readily available.
OBJECTIVES: To document the natural history of DCTA triplets and the effect of reduction on the risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery, compared with expectant management. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: DCTA triplets with three live fetuses at 8-14 weeks of gestation, outcome data with expectant management and/or reduction, miscarriage before 24 weeks of gestation and/or severe preterm delivery before 32-33 weeks of gestation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five studies were included. Data from these were combined with data from three centres. MAIN
RESULTS: There were 331 DCTA triplets. The miscarriage rate was 8.9% (95% CI 5.8-13.3%) and the severe preterm delivery rate was 33.3% (95% CI 27.5-39.7%), with expectant management. The miscarriage rate was 14.5% (95% CI 7.6-26.2%) with a reduction of the monochorionic pair, 8.8% (95% CI 3.0-23.0%) with a reduction of one fetus of the monochorionic pair, and 23.5% (9.6-47.3%) with a reduction of the fetus with a separate placenta. Severe preterm delivery rates were 5.5% (95% CI 1.9-14-9%), 11.8% (95% CI 4.7-26.6%), and 17.6% (95% CI 6.2-41.0%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In DCTA triplets, expectant management is a reasonable choice when the top priority is a liveborn infant. Where the priority is to minimise severe preterm delivery, the most advisable option is fetal reduction. Further studies are needed to clarify which particular technique is advisable to optimise the outcome.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dichorionic triplets; embryo reduction; fetal reduction; mixed chorionicity; selective termination; triplet pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851612     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

1.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a frozen-thawed embryo transfer pregnancy: a rare case report.

Authors:  Lihua Yang; Rong Wang; Fang Wang; Feifeng Wang; Libo Zou
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of dichorionic and trichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy with multifetal pregnancy reduction: a retrospective analysis study.

Authors:  Shuhua Liu; Guanjian Li; Chao Wang; Ping Zhou; Zhaolian Wei; Bing Song
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Maternal, Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Triplet Pregnancies According to Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mireia Bernal Claverol; María Ruiz Minaya; Irene Aracil Moreno; Santiago García Tizón; Pilar Pintado Recarte; Melchor Alvarez-Mon; Coral Bravo Arribas; Miguel A Ortega; Juan A De Leon-Luis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: multifoetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management.

Authors:  Pei Cai; Yan Ouyang; Fei Gong; Xihong Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.