Literature DB >> 2585155

Does review of peripheral blood smears help in the initial workup of common anemias?

J O Simmons1, G L Noel, L F Diehl.   

Abstract

Sixty-five physicians were tested to determine the effect of their reviews of red blood cell morphology on their subsequent diagnoses of and workup plans for common anemias. The subjects read clinical and laboratory data for six pairs of cases of anemia, reviewing the blood smear for one case in each pair. They correctly identified the presence or absence of morphologic features on the blood smears 82% of the time. In spite of excellent morphologic discrimination, the number of tests ordered was not affected by blood smear review. In fact, the quality of the physicians' workup plans, measured by numbers of tests appropriately ordered and excluded, was slightly but significantly better when they did not review the smears (p less than 0.005). In addition, smear review did not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy for any of the common anemias studied. Significantly more correct diagnoses were made without smear review for vitamin B12-folate deficiency anemia (p less than 0.015) and thalassemia (p less than 0.0001). Although routine review of blood smears by physicians in the management of common anemias may provide useful information, the authors were unable to demonstrate an improvement in the number or appropriateness of tests ordered or diagnostic accuracy in spite of excellent morphologic discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2585155     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  10 in total

1.  The red cell indices in the diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia.

Authors:  E BEUTLER
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1959-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Interpretation of electronically determined macrocytosis.

Authors:  P McPhedran; M G Barnes; J S Weinstein; J S Robertson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Is the peripheral blood film reliable for the diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia?

Authors:  V F Fairbanks
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Microcytosis. Its significance and evaluation.

Authors:  M H Steinberg; B J Dreiling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  High mean red cell volume: its incidence and significance in routine haematology.

Authors:  R J Davidson; P J Hamilton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Quantitative morphological analysis of red blood cells.

Authors:  J W Bacus
Journal:  Blood Cells       Date:  1980

7.  Failure to suspect and diagnose thalassemic syndromes. Interpretation of RBC indices by the nonhematologist.

Authors:  R M Hansen; G Hanson; T Anderson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-01

8.  Clinical laboratory use in the evaluation of anemia.

Authors:  L A Wheeler; G Brecher; L B Sheiner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-12-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The value of the peripheral blood smear in anemic inpatients. The laboratory's reading v a physician's reading.

Authors:  P Jen; B Woo; P E Rosenthal; H F Bunn; A Loscalzo; L Goldman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1983-06

10.  The clinical significance of macrocytosis.

Authors:  F C Breedveld; R Bieger; R K van Wermeskerken
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1981
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Peripheral Smear Review and Bone Marrow Biopsy Correlation.

Authors:  Adrian R Bersabe; James K Aden; Nathan M Shumway; Michael B Osswald
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Iron deficiency anemia in the elderly: the diagnostic process.

Authors:  C Patterson; G H Guyatt; J Singer; M Ali; I Turpie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Clinician-ordered peripheral blood smears have low reimbursement and variable clinical value: a three-institution study, with suggestions for operational efficiency.

Authors:  Amy K Beckman; Valerie L Ng; David L Jaye; Manila Gaddh; Sarah A Williams; Sophia L Yohe; Lin Zhang; Michael A Linden
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.