Literature DB >> 25851386

What's new on the HPA axis?

Johannes Hofland1, Jan Bakker, Richard A Feelders.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851386      PMCID: PMC4502291          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3771-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The human body depends on an integrated neuro-endocrine response in order to adapt to external and internal stressors. In critical illness this stress response coordinates endocrine, neural, cardiovascular and immune systems with the aim to maximize survival chances. The hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which also includes elements producing the neurohypophysial hormone arginine–vasopressin (AVP), is one the key effectors within this system [1]. Relative HPA or AVP deficiency contributes to cardiovascular collapse in critically ill patients, leading to the rationale of therapy with these hormones in shock. Recent developments have implicated copeptin, a by-product of the AVP precursor, as a novel biomarker for early stages of critical illness that could influence clinical decision-making.

Physiology of the HPA axis

A wide variety of circulating local and neurosensory signals control hypothalamic corticotrophic-releasing hormone (CRH) and AVP release from the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Parvocellular neurons co-secrete CRH and AVP into the hypophysial portal circulation. These peptides reach the adenohypophysis and synergistically stimulate the release of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH). ACTH increases adrenocortical production and the release of cortisol, the main glucocorticoid in humans with widespread homeostatic effects in many organs. In a recent elegant study, Boonen et al. demonstrated that elevated cortisol levels in critical illness result from a reduced cortisol metabolism [2] despite suppressed ACTH and cortisol pulse secretion [3]. AVP is also produced in the magnocellular neurons of the PVN and directly secreted into the bloodstream through their axons in the posterior pituitary (Fig. 1a). The principal effects of circulating AVP are vasoconstriction through its V1a receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells and water conservation through renal V2 receptors.
Fig. 1

a Schematic overview of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and arginine–vasopressin (AVP). Co-secreted corticotrophic-releasing hormone (CRH) and AVP from the parvocellular (P) cells of the paraventricular nucleus stimulate pituitary release of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), which in turn induces cortisol secretion from the adrenal. Hypothalamic magnocellular (M) neurons transport AVP through their axons to the posterior pituitary where AVP is secreted in response to osmotic or hemodynamic stimuli. b Precursor molecule of AVP consisting of four individual peptides

a Schematic overview of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and arginine–vasopressin (AVP). Co-secreted corticotrophic-releasing hormone (CRH) and AVP from the parvocellular (P) cells of the paraventricular nucleus stimulate pituitary release of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), which in turn induces cortisol secretion from the adrenal. Hypothalamic magnocellular (M) neurons transport AVP through their axons to the posterior pituitary where AVP is secreted in response to osmotic or hemodynamic stimuli. b Precursor molecule of AVP consisting of four individual peptides

Biomarkers of AVP system

As a stress marker, levels of AVP show a bi-phasic response during disease, with an initial rise depending on disease severity and subsequent decrease. Implementation of AVP measurements for clinical decision-making in patients has been hampered by the stability of the peptide, its binding to platelets and its short half-life of 24 min. The nonapeptide AVP is cleaved from its precursor preprovasopressin together with neurophysin II and copeptin (Fig. 1b). Copeptin is a glycopeptide with an obscure function which constitutes the C-terminal 39 amino acids of preprovasopressin and demonstrates significant stability ex vivo and even post-mortem [4, 5]. The development of a one-step sandwich immunoassay for copeptin has provided the tool for an increasing number of studies over the last decade into the use of this AVP co-secreted peptide as an early marker for osmotic or hemodynamic dysregulation. First studied in septic shock patients, copeptin levels were found to be >400-fold higher in this patient population than in healthy control subjects [5]. Circulating copeptin concentrations are also increased in critically ill patients during early stages of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke or after major surgery and trauma and are associated with AVP, C-reactive protein and cortisol concentrations, osmolality and disease severity [4, 6–12]. Copeptin levels at presentation are associated with mortality and have been shown to be additive in prediction models of survival in patients with septic shock [7, 8], myocardial infarction [10] and stroke [12]. Moreover, copeptin is superior to AVP as discriminator between septic and non-septic patients [13]. Interestingly, the correlation between AVP and copeptin levels has been found to dissipate in patients on hemofiltration therapy, thereby questioning the reliability of copeptin measurement as an adequate marker of the vasopressinergic system in this patient subgroup [4, 9]. As expected, copeptin level decreases in the majority of patients treated with exogenous AVP [14]. In a recent extensive Chinese study of patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis [15], copeptin was measured together other stress markers. All markers showed a step-wise increment according to disease severity. In the patient population, copeptin, cortisol and ACTH levels measured at admission were all inversely associated with survival, with copeptin having the highest prognostic value [receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC) of 0.826]. Intriguingly, the combination of copeptin, cortisol and procalcitonin concentrations and the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score yielded an AUC of 0.891 for predicting 28-day survival.

Conclusions

Copeptin constitutes a novel and promising biomarker during the acute phase for disease severity and prognosis in critically ill patients. Its concentration can distinguish between sepsis and other causes of critical illness and appears a superior marker to AVP. Future studies are needed to delineate whether copeptin measurements are cost-effective, add significantly to clinical judgment and can be utilized for stratification of therapy, particularly early management of sepsis.
  15 in total

1.  The stress response and immune function: clinical implications. The 1999 Novera H. Spector Lecture.

Authors:  G P Chrousos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Copeptin and arginine vasopressin concentrations in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Stefan Jochberger; Nils G Morgenthaler; Viktoria D Mayr; Günter Luckner; Volker Wenzel; Hanno Ulmer; Siegfried Schwarz; Walter R Hasibeder; Barbara E Friesenecker; Martin W Dünser
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Reduced nocturnal ACTH-driven cortisol secretion during critical illness.

Authors:  Eva Boonen; Philippe Meersseman; Hilke Vervenne; Geert Meyfroidt; Fabian Guïza; Pieter J Wouters; Johannes D Veldhuis; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  Plasma copeptin levels before and during exogenous arginine vasopressin infusion in patients with advanced vasodilatory shock.

Authors:  C Torgersen; G Luckner; N G Morgenthaler; S Jochberger; C A Schmittinger; V Wenzel; W R Hasibeder; W Grander; M W Dünser
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the vasopressin precursor, is elevated in serum of sepsis patients.

Authors:  Joachim Struck; Nils G Morgenthaler; Andreas Bergmann
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Proven infection-related sepsis induces a differential stress response early after ICU admission.

Authors:  Olivier Lesur; Jean-Francois Roussy; Frederic Chagnon; Nicole Gallo-Payet; Robert Dumaine; Philippe Sarret; Ahmed Chraibi; Lucie Chouinard; Bruno Hogue
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis to determine the incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Ricardo O Escárcega; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Marco A Magalhães; Nevin C Baker; Rebecca Torguson; Fang Chen; Stephen E Epstein; Oscar Miró; Pere Llorens; Evangelos Giannitsis; Ulrich Lotze; Sophie Lefebvre; Mustapha Sebbane; Jean-Paul Cristol; Camille Chenevier-Gobeaux; Christophe Meune; Kai M Eggers; Sandrine Charpentier; Raphael Twerenbold; Christian Mueller; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Copeptin adds prognostic information after ischemic stroke: results from the CoRisk study.

Authors:  Gian Marco De Marchis; Mira Katan; Anja Weck; Felix Fluri; Christian Foerch; Oliver Findling; Philipp Schuetz; Daniela Buhl; Marwan El-Koussy; Henrik Gensicke; Marlen Seiler; Nils Morgenthaler; Heinrich P Mattle; Beat Mueller; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Marcel Arnold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Prognostic significance of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones in early sepsis: a study performed in the emergency department.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Guijuan Dong; Xin Zhao; Miaomiao Wang; Chun-Sheng Li
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Reduced cortisol metabolism during critical illness.

Authors:  Eva Boonen; Hilke Vervenne; Philippe Meersseman; Ruth Andrew; Leen Mortier; Peter E Declercq; Yoo-Mee Vanwijngaerden; Isabel Spriet; Pieter J Wouters; Sarah Vander Perre; Lies Langouche; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Brian R Walker; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.