Literature DB >> 25851309

Carbon Nanotube and Nanofiber Exposure Assessments: An Analysis of 14 Site Visits.

Matthew M Dahm1, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan2, Douglas E Evans3, M Eileen Birch3, Joseph E Fernback3, James A Deddens2.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has suggested the potential for wide-ranging health effects that could result from exposure to carbon nanotubes (CNT) and carbon nanofibers (CNF). In response, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) set a recommended exposure limit (REL) for CNT and CNF: 1 µg m(-3) as an 8-h time weighted average (TWA) of elemental carbon (EC) for the respirable size fraction. The purpose of this study was to conduct an industrywide exposure assessment among US CNT and CNF manufacturers and users. Fourteen total sites were visited to assess exposures to CNT (13 sites) and CNF (1 site). Personal breathing zone (PBZ) and area samples were collected for both the inhalable and respirable mass concentration of EC, using NIOSH Method 5040. Inhalable PBZ samples were collected at nine sites while at the remaining five sites both respirable and inhalable PBZ samples were collected side-by-side. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) PBZ and area samples were also collected at the inhalable size fraction and analyzed to quantify and size CNT and CNF agglomerate and fibrous exposures. Respirable EC PBZ concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 2.94 µg m(-3) with a geometric mean (GM) of 0.34 µg m(-3) and an 8-h TWA of 0.16 µg m(-3). PBZ samples at the inhalable size fraction for EC ranged from 0.01 to 79.57 µg m(-3) with a GM of 1.21 µg m(-3). PBZ samples analyzed by TEM showed concentrations ranging from 0.0001 to 1.613 CNT or CNF-structures per cm(3) with a GM of 0.008 and an 8-h TWA concentration of 0.003. The most common CNT structure sizes were found to be larger agglomerates in the 2-5 µm range as well as agglomerates >5 µm. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the inhalable samples for the mass of EC and structure counts by TEM (Spearman ρ = 0.39, P < 0.0001). Overall, EC PBZ and area TWA samples were below the NIOSH REL (96% were <1 μg m(-3) at the respirable size fraction), while 30% of the inhalable PBZ EC samples were found to be >1 μg m(-3). Until more information is known about health effects associated with larger agglomerates, it seems prudent to assess worker exposure to airborne CNT and CNF materials by monitoring EC at both the respirable and inhalable size fractions. Concurrent TEM samples should be collected to confirm the presence of CNT and CNF. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon nanofibers; carbon nanotubes; exposure assessment; nanomaterials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851309      PMCID: PMC4507369          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mev020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  29 in total

Review 1.  Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends.

Authors:  R J Aitken; M Q Chaudhry; A B A Boxall; M Hull
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Han; Eun Jung Lee; Ji Hyun Lee; Kang Pyo So; Young Hee Lee; Gwi Nam Bae; Seung-Bok Lee; Jun Ho Ji; Myung Haing Cho; Il Je Yu
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Exposure assessment of carbon nanotube manufacturing workplaces.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Seung-Bok Lee; Gwi Nam Bae; Ki Soo Jeon; Jin Uk Yoon; Jun Ho Ji; Jae Hyuck Sung; Byung Gyu Lee; Jong Han Lee; Jung Sun Yang; Hyeon Yeong Kim; Chang Soo Kang; Il Je Yu
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks.

Authors:  Chiu-Wing Lam; John T James; Richard McCluskey; Sivaram Arepalli; Robert L Hunter
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material.

Authors:  Andrew D Maynard; Paul A Baron; Michael Foley; Anna A Shvedova; Elena R Kisin; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2004-01-09

Review 6.  Asbestos, carbon nanotubes and the pleural mesothelium: a review of the hypothesis regarding the role of long fibre retention in the parietal pleura, inflammation and mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ken Donaldson; Fiona A Murphy; Rodger Duffin; Craig A Poland
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 9.400

7.  Alteration of deposition pattern and pulmonary response as a result of improved dispersion of aspirated single-walled carbon nanotubes in a mouse model.

Authors:  R R Mercer; J Scabilloni; L Wang; E Kisin; A R Murray; D Schwegler-Berry; A A Shvedova; V Castranova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 5.464

8.  Mouse pulmonary dose- and time course-responses induced by exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Dale W Porter; Ann F Hubbs; Robert R Mercer; Nianqiang Wu; Michael G Wolfarth; Krishnan Sriram; Stephen Leonard; Lori Battelli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sherry Friend; Michael Andrew; Bean T Chen; Shuji Tsuruoka; Morinobu Endo; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Mechanisms for how inhaled multiwalled carbon nanotubes suppress systemic immune function in mice.

Authors:  L A Mitchell; F T Lauer; S W Burchiel; J D McDonald
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Induction of mesothelioma in p53+/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube.

Authors:  Atsuya Takagi; Akihiko Hirose; Tetsuji Nishimura; Nobutaka Fukumori; Akio Ogata; Norio Ohashi; Satoshi Kitajima; Jun Kanno
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.196

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  The asbestos-carbon nanotube analogy: An update.

Authors:  Agnes B Kane; Robert H Hurt; Huajian Gao
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  Quantification of Carbon Nanotubes in Environmental Matrices: Current Capabilities, Case Studies, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; D Xanat Flores-Cervantes; Thomas D Bucheli; Lindsay C C Elliott; Jeffrey A Fagan; Alexander Gogos; Shannon Hanna; Ralf Kägi; Elisabeth Mansfield; Antonio R Montoro Bustos; Desiree L Plata; Vytas Reipa; Paul Westerhoff; Michael R Winchester
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Predicting Occupational Exposures to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers Based on Workplace Determinants Modeling.

Authors:  Matthew M Dahm; Stephen Bertke; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 4.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Methodological, political and legal issues in the assessment of the effects of nanotechnology on human health.

Authors:  Irina Guseva Canu; Paul A Schulte; Michael Riediker; Liliya Fatkhutdinova; Enrico Bergamaschi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  A New Approach Combining Analytical Methods for Workplace Exposure Assessment of Inhalable Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.

Authors:  Peter C Tromp; Eelco Kuijpers; Cindy Bekker; Lode Godderis; Qing Lan; Aleksandra D Jedynska; Roel Vermeulen; Anjoeka Pronk
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.179

7.  Taking stock of the occupational safety and health challenges of nanotechnology: 2000-2015.

Authors:  P A Schulte; G Roth; L L Hodson; V Murashov; M D Hoover; R Zumwalde; E D Kuempel; C L Geraci; A B Stefaniak; V Castranova; J Howard
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Laboratory evaluation of a personal aethalometer for assessing airborne carbon nanotube exposures.

Authors:  Patrick O'Shaughnessy; Adrianne Stoltenberg; Craig Holder; Ralph Altmaier
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 9.  Review of techniques and studies characterizing the release of carbon nanotubes from nanocomposites: Implications for exposure and human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael Kovochich; Cha-Chen David Fung; Raghavendhran Avanasi; Amy K Madl
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Occupational Exposure to Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes During Commercial Production Synthesis and Handling.

Authors:  Eelco Kuijpers; Cindy Bekker; Wouter Fransman; Derk Brouwer; Peter Tromp; Jelle Vlaanderen; Lode Godderis; Peter Hoet; Qing Lan; Debra Silverman; Roel Vermeulen; Anjoeka Pronk
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.