Literature DB >> 25851141

Red:far-red light conditions affect the emission of volatile organic compounds from barley (Hordeum vulgare), leading to altered biomass allocation in neighbouring plants.

Wouter Kegge1, Velemir Ninkovic1, Robert Glinwood1, Rob A M Welschen1, Laurentius A C J Voesenek1, Ronald Pierik2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play various roles in plant-plant interactions, and constitutively produced VOCs might act as a cue to sense neighbouring plants. Previous studies have shown that VOCs emitted from the barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivar 'Alva' cause changes in biomass allocation in plants of the cultivar 'Kara'. Other studies have shown that shading and the low red:far-red (R:FR) conditions that prevail at high plant densities can reduce the quantity and alter the composition of the VOCs emitted by Arabidopsis thaliana, but whether this affects plant-plant signalling remains unknown. This study therefore examines the effects of far-red light enrichment on VOC emissions and plant-plant signalling between 'Alva' and 'Kara'.
METHODS: The proximity of neighbouring plants was mimicked by supplemental far-red light treatment of VOC emitter plants of barley grown in growth chambers. Volatiles emitted by 'Alva' under control and far-red light-enriched conditions were analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). 'Kara' plants were exposed to the VOC blend emitted by the 'Alva' plants that were subjected to either of the light treatments. Dry matter partitioning, leaf area, stem and total root length were determined for 'Kara' plants exposed to 'Alva' VOCs, and also for 'Alva' plants exposed to either control or far-red-enriched light treatments. KEY
RESULTS: Total VOC emissions by 'Alva' were reduced under low R:FR conditions compared with control light conditions, although individual volatile compounds were found to be either suppressed, induced or not affected by R:FR. The altered composition of the VOC blend emitted by 'Alva' plants exposed to low R:FR was found to affect carbon allocation in receiver plants of 'Kara'.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that changes in R:FR light conditions influence the emissions of VOCs in barley, and that these altered emissions affect VOC-mediated plant-plant interactions.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barley; Hordeum vulgare; VOCs; biomass allocation; ethylene; light quality; phytochrome; plant density; plant–plant signalling; red:far-red ratio; shade avoidance; volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851141      PMCID: PMC4407068          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  17 in total

1.  Canopy studies on ethylene-insensitive tobacco identify ethylene as a novel element in blue light and plant-plant signalling.

Authors:  Ronald Pierik; Garry C Whitelam; Laurentius A C J Voesenek; Hans de Kroon; Eric J W Visser
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 2.  Shade avoidance: phytochrome signalling and other aboveground neighbour detection cues.

Authors:  Ronald Pierik; Mieke de Wit
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Allelopathy ofSasa cernua.

Authors:  H H Li; H Nishimura; K Hasegawa; J Mizutani
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Biogenic volatile organic compounds and plant competition.

Authors:  Wouter Kegge; Ronald Pierik
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Ethylene-induced differential growth of petioles in Arabidopsis. Analyzing natural variation, response kinetics, and regulation.

Authors:  Frank F Millenaar; Marjolein C H Cox; Yvonne E M de Jong van Berkel; Rob A M Welschen; Ronald Pierik; Laurentius A J C Voesenek; Anton J M Peeters
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants.

Authors:  Justin B Runyon; Mark C Mescher; Consuelo M De Moraes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The mechanism of rhythmic ethylene production in sorghum. The role of phytochrome B and simulated shading.

Authors:  S A Finlayson; I J Lee; J E Mullet; P W Morgan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 8.  Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade.

Authors:  Jorge J Casal
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 26.379

9.  Olfactory learning of plant genotypes by a polyphagous insect predator.

Authors:  Robert Glinwood; Elham Ahmed; Erika Qvarfordt; Velemir Ninkovic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Canopy light cues affect emission of constitutive and methyl jasmonate-induced volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Wouter Kegge; Berhane T Weldegergis; Roxina Soler; Marleen Vergeer-Van Eijk; Marcel Dicke; Laurentius A C J Voesenek; Ronald Pierik
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The foundations of plant intelligence.

Authors:  Anthony Trewavas
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Who is my neighbor? Volatile cues in plant interactions.

Authors:  Velemir Ninkovic; Merlin Rensing; Iris Dahlin; Dimitrije Markovic
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2019-07-03

3.  Root volatiles in plant-plant interactions I: High root sesquiterpene release is associated with increased germination and growth of plant neighbours.

Authors:  Valentin Gfeller; Meret Huber; Christiane Förster; Wei Huang; Tobias G Köllner; Matthias Erb
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 4.  Canopy Light Quality Modulates Stress Responses in Plants.

Authors:  Sarah Courbier; Ronald Pierik
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Exploring plant volatile-mediated interactions between native and introduced plants and insects.

Authors:  Evans Effah; Logan Svendsen; D Paul Barrett; Andrea Clavijo McCormick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Alteration in Light Spectra Causes Opposite Responses in Volatile Phenylpropanoids and Terpenoids Compared with Phenolic Acids in Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum) Leaves.

Authors:  Minna Kivimäenpä; Adedayo Mofikoya; Ahmed M Abd El-Raheem; Johanna Riikonen; Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto; Jarmo K Holopainen
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.895

7.  Plant Responses to Brief Touching: A Mechanism for Early Neighbour Detection?

Authors:  Dimitrije Markovic; Neda Nikolic; Robert Glinwood; Gulaim Seisenbaeva; Velemir Ninkovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genetic diversity in developmental responses to light spectral quality in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  Arantxa Monteagudo; Tibor Kiss; Marianna Mayer; Ana M Casas; Ernesto Igartua; Ildikó Karsai
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 9.  Plant volatiles as cues and signals in plant communication.

Authors:  Velemir Ninkovic; Dimitrije Markovic; Merlin Rensing
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 7.228

10.  Integrative Identification of Crucial Genes Associated With Plant Hormone-Mediated Bud Dormancy in Prunus mume.

Authors:  Ping Li; Tangchun Zheng; Zhiyong Zhang; Weichao Liu; Like Qiu; Jia Wang; Tangren Cheng; Qixiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.