Literature DB >> 25851137

A theoretical approach to the relationship between wettability and surface microstructures of epidermal cells and structured cuticles of flower petals.

Haruhiko Taneda1, Ayako Watanabe-Taneda2, Rita Chhetry2, Hiroshi Ikeda2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The epidermal surface of a flower petal is composed of convex cells covered with a structured cuticle, and the roughness of the surface is related to the wettability of the petal. If the surface remains wet for an excessive amount of time the attractiveness of the petal to floral visitors may be impaired, and adhesion of pathogens may be promoted. However, it remains unclear how the epidermal cells and structured cuticle contribute to surface wettability of a petal.
METHODS: By considering the additive effects of the epidermal cells and structured cuticle on petal wettability, a thermodynamic model was developed to predict the wetting mode and contact angle of a water droplet at a minimum free energy. Quantitative relationships between petal wettability and the geometries of the epidermal cells and the structured cuticle were then estimated. Measurements of contact angles and anatomical traits of petals were made on seven herbaceous species commonly found in alpine habitats in eastern Nepal, and the measured wettability values were compared with those predicted by the model using the measured geometries of the epidermal cells and structured cuticles. KEY
RESULTS: The model indicated that surface wettability depends on the height and interval between cuticular steps, and on a height-to-width ratio for epidermal cells if a thick hydrophobic cuticle layer covers the surface. For a petal epidermis consisting of lenticular cells, a repellent surface results when the cuticular step height is greater than 0·85 µm and the height-to-width ratio of the epidermal cells is greater than 0·3. For an epidermis consisting of papillate cells, a height-to-width ratio of greater than 1·1 produces a repellent surface. In contrast, if the surface is covered with a thin cuticle layer, the petal is highly wettable (hydrophilic) irrespective of the roughness of the surface. These predictions were supported by the measurements of petal wettability made on flowers of alpine species.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that surface roughness caused by epidermal cells and a structured cuticle produces a wide range of petal wettability, and that this can be successfully modelled using a thermodynamic approach.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cassie–Baxter wetting; Epidermis; Wenzel wetting; alpine plant; cuticle structure; lotus effect; petal effect; petal wettability; thermodynamic model; water run-off

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851137      PMCID: PMC4407063          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  15 in total

1.  The rose petal effect and the modes of superhydrophobicity.

Authors:  Bharat Bhushan; Michael Nosonovsky
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Recent developments in bio-inspired special wettability.

Authors:  Kesong Liu; Xi Yao; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Conical epidermal cells allow bees to grip flowers and increase foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Lars Chittka; Toby J A Bruce; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  When Wenzel and Cassie are right: reconciling local and global considerations.

Authors:  Abraham Marmur; Eyal Bittoun
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  Surface microstructures of daisy florets (Asteraceae) and characterization of their anisotropic wetting.

Authors:  Kerstin Koch; Michael Bennemann; Holger F Bohn; Dirk C Albach; Wilhelm Barthlott
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.956

6.  Leaf wettability decreases along an extreme altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Biva Aryal; Gilbert Neuner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A theory for the morphological dependence of wetting on a physically patterned solid surface.

Authors:  Azar Shahraz; Ali Borhan; Kristen A Fichthorn
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.882

8.  Structural analysis of wheat wax (Triticum aestivum, c.v. 'Naturastar' L.): from the molecular level to three dimensional crystals.

Authors:  K Koch; W Barthlott; S Koch; A Hommes; K Wandelt; W Mamdouh; S De-Feyter; P Broekmann
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  How Wenzel and cassie were wrong.

Authors:  Lichao Gao; Thomas J McCarthy
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  Effect of sessile drop volume on the wetting anisotropy observed on grooved surfaces.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Felicity R A J Rose; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Morgan R Alexander
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.882

View more
  3 in total

1.  Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Mani Shrestha; Laura Ospina-Rozo; Chaitali Dekiwadia; Matthew R Field; Ji Sheng Ma; Nhiem Tran; Adrian G Dyer; Kate Fox; Andrew D Greentree
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Conical petal epidermal cells, regulated by the MYB transcription factor MIXTA, have an ancient origin within the angiosperms.

Authors:  Alison Reed; Paula J Rudall; Samuel F Brockington; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.298

3.  Surprising absence of association between flower surface microstructure and pollination system.

Authors:  M Kraaij; C J van der Kooi
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.081

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.