Frida I Piper1, Michael J Gundale2, Alex Fajardo2. 1. Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP) Conicyt-Regional R10C1003, Universidad Austral de Chile, Camino Baguales s/n, Coyhaique 5951601, Chile, Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile and Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden fpiper@ciep.cl. 2. Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP) Conicyt-Regional R10C1003, Universidad Austral de Chile, Camino Baguales s/n, Coyhaique 5951601, Chile, Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile and Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a growing concern about how forests will respond to increased herbivory associated with climate change. Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) limitation are hypothesized to cause decreasing growth after defoliation, and eventually mortality. This study examines the effects of a natural and massive defoliation by an insect on mature trees' C and N storage, which have rarely been studied together, particularly in winter-deciduous species. METHODS: Survival, growth rate, carbon [C, as non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration] and nitrogen (N) storage, defences (tannins and total polyphenols), and re-foliation traits were examined in naturally defoliated and non-defoliated adult trees of the winter-deciduous temperate species Nothofagus pumilio 1 and 2 years after a massive and complete defoliation caused by the caterpillar of Ormiscodes amphimone (Saturniidae) during summer 2009 in Patagonia. KEY RESULTS: Defoliated trees did not die but grew significantly less than non-defoliated trees for at least 2 years after defoliation. One year after defoliation, defoliated trees had similar NSC and N concentrations in woody tissues, higher polyphenol concentrations and lower re-foliation than non-defoliated trees. In the second year, however, NSC concentrations in branches were significantly higher in defoliated trees while differences in polyphenols and re-foliation disappeared and decreased, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction in growth following defoliation was not caused by insufficient C or N availability, as frequently assumed; instead, it was probably due to growth limitations due to factors other than C or N, or to preventative C allocation to storage. This study shows an integrative approach to evaluating plant growth limitations in response to disturbance, by examining major resources other than C (e.g. N), and other C sinks besides storage and growth (e.g. defences and re-foliation).
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a growing concern about how forests will respond to increased herbivory associated with climate change. Carbon (C) and n class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) limitation are hypothesized to cause decreasing growth after defoliation, and eventually mortality. This study examines the effects of a natural and massive defoliation by an insect on mature trees' C and N storage, which have rarely been studied together, particularly in winter-deciduous species. METHODS: Survival, growth rate, carbon [C, as non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration] and nitrogen (N) storage, defences (tannins and total polyphenols), and re-foliation traits were examined in naturally defoliated and non-defoliated adult trees of the winter-deciduous temperate species Nothofagus pumilio 1 and 2 years after a massive and complete defoliation caused by the caterpillar of Ormiscodes amphimone (Saturniidae) during summer 2009 in Patagonia. KEY RESULTS: Defoliated trees did not die but grew significantly less than non-defoliated trees for at least 2 years after defoliation. One year after defoliation, defoliated trees had similar NSC and N concentrations in woody tissues, higher polyphenol concentrations and lower re-foliation than non-defoliated trees. In the second year, however, NSC concentrations in branches were significantly higher in defoliated trees while differences in polyphenols and re-foliation disappeared and decreased, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction in growth following defoliation was not caused by insufficient C or N availability, as frequently assumed; instead, it was probably due to growth limitations due to factors other than C or N, or to preventative C allocation to storage. This study shows an integrative approach to evaluating plant growth limitations in response to disturbance, by examining major resources other than C (e.g. N), and other C sinks besides storage and growth (e.g. defences and re-foliation).
Authors: Phillip J van Mantgem; Nathan L Stephenson; John C Byrne; Lori D Daniels; Jerry F Franklin; Peter Z Fulé; Mark E Harmon; Andrew J Larson; Jeremy M Smith; Alan H Taylor; Thomas T Veblen Journal: Science Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Nate G McDowell; David J Beerling; David D Breshears; Rosie A Fisher; Kenneth F Raffa; Mark Stitt Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Mireia Gomez-Gallego; Nari Williams; Sebastian Leuzinger; Peter Matthew Scott; Martin Karl-Friedrich Bader Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Katarína Merganičová; Ján Merganič; Aleksi Lehtonen; Giorgio Vacchiano; Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever; Andrey L D Augustynczik; Rüdiger Grote; Ina Kyselová; Annikki Mäkelä; Rasoul Yousefpour; Jan Krejza; Alessio Collalti; Christopher P O Reyer Journal: Tree Physiol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Rocío Urrutia-Jalabert; Antonio Lara; Jonathan Barichivich; Nicolás Vergara; Carmen Gloria Rodriguez; Frida I Piper Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 5.753