Literature DB >> 25850990

Measuring coral size-frequency distribution using stereo video technology, a comparison with in situ measurements.

Joseph A Turner1, Nicholas V C Polunin, Stuart N Field, Shaun K Wilson.   

Abstract

Coral colony size-frequency distribution data offer valuable information about the ecological status of coral reefs. Such data are usually collected by divers in situ, but stereo video is being increasingly used for monitoring benthic marine communities and may be used to collect size information for coral colonies. This study compared the size-frequency distributions of coral colonies obtained by divers measuring colonies 'in situ' with digital video imagery collected using stereo video and later processed using computer software. The size-frequency distributions of the two methods were similar for corymbose colonies, although distributions were different for massive, branching and all colonies combined. The differences are mainly driven by greater abundance of colonies >50 cm and fewer colonies <10 cm recorded when using the in situ method. The stereo video method detected 93% of marked colonies >5 cm and was able to record measurements on 87% of the colonies detected. However, stereo video only detected 57% of marked colonies <5 cm, suggesting that this method may be unsuitable for assessing abundance of coral recruits. Estimates of colony size made with the stereo video were smaller than the in situ technique for all growth forms, particularly for massive morphologies. Despite differences in size distributions, community assessments, which incorporated genera, growth forms and size, were similar between the two techniques. Stereo video is suitable for monitoring coral community demographics and provided data similar to in situ measure for corymbose corals, but the ability to accurately measure massive and branching coral morphologies appeared to decline with increasing colony size.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850990     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4431-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

Review 1.  Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience.

Authors:  Terry P Hughes; Nicholas A J Graham; Jeremy B C Jackson; Peter J Mumby; Robert S Steneck
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  A demographic approach to monitoring the health of coral reefs.

Authors:  L D Smith; M Devlin; D Haynes; J P Gilmour
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts.

Authors:  Kent E Carpenter; Muhammad Abrar; Greta Aeby; Richard B Aronson; Stuart Banks; Andrew Bruckner; Angel Chiriboga; Jorge Cortés; J Charles Delbeek; Lyndon Devantier; Graham J Edgar; Alasdair J Edwards; Douglas Fenner; Héctor M Guzmán; Bert W Hoeksema; Gregor Hodgson; Ofri Johan; Wilfredo Y Licuanan; Suzanne R Livingstone; Edward R Lovell; Jennifer A Moore; David O Obura; Domingo Ochavillo; Beth A Polidoro; William F Precht; Miledel C Quibilan; Clarissa Reboton; Zoe T Richards; Alex D Rogers; Jonnell Sanciangco; Anne Sheppard; Charles Sheppard; Jennifer Smith; Simon Stuart; Emre Turak; John E N Veron; Carden Wallace; Ernesto Weil; Elizabeth Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Can juvenile corals be surveyed effectively using digital photography?: implications for rapid assessment techniques.

Authors:  Scott C Burgess; Kate Osborne; Bianca Sfiligoj; Hugh Sweatman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Variation in the size structure of corals is related to environmental extremes in the Persian Gulf.

Authors:  Andrew G Bauman; Morgan S Pratchett; Andrew H Baird; Bernhard Riegl; Scott F Heron; David A Feary
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.130

6.  Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance.

Authors:  James P Gilmour; Luke D Smith; Andrew J Heyward; Andrew H Baird; Morgan S Pratchett
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Remote high-definition rotating video enables fast spatial survey of marine underwater macrofauna and habitats.

Authors:  Dominique Pelletier; Kévin Leleu; Delphine Mallet; Gérard Mou-Tham; Gilles Hervé; Matthieu Boureau; Nicolas Guilpart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Marine reserves enhance the recovery of corals on Caribbean reefs.

Authors:  Peter J Mumby; Alastair R Harborne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessing coral health and disease from digital photographs and in situ surveys.

Authors:  C A Page; S N Field; F J Pollock; J B Lamb; G Shedrawi; S K Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Assessing population changes of historically overexploited black corals (Order: Antipatharia) in Cozumel, Mexico.

Authors:  Erika Gress; Dominic A Andradi-Brown
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Size-frequency distribution of coral assemblages in insular shallow reefs of the Mexican Caribbean using underwater photogrammetry.

Authors:  Roberto C Hernández-Landa; Erick Barrera-Falcon; Rodolfo Rioja-Nieto
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.