| Literature DB >> 25850727 |
Giovanni Tortorella1, Andrea Piccin2, Alessia Tieghi3, Luigi Marcheselli4, Michael Steurer5, Günther Gastl5, Katia Codeluppi3, Angelo Fama3, Umberto Santoro6, Chiara Birtolo7, Gabriele Gugliotta8, Sergio Cortelazzo9, Luigi Gugliotta10.
Abstract
In this prospective observational single-center study, 55 patients with essential thrombocythemia who were candidates for second line treatment with anagrelide (ANA) received a preliminary cardiovascular (CV) clinical, instrumental and biochemical evaluation (CV history and symptoms, CV risk factors, blood pressure, heart rate, ECG and ECHO-cardio parameters, Troponin I, NT-proBNP). After this in-depth CV screening, 54 out of 55 patients were deemed to be fit for ANA treatment. Thirty-eight of the 55 patients received ANA treatment for a median of 36 months (range 3-48), and were monitored using the same CV evaluation. Fourteen of these 38 patients manifested CV adverse events (10 palpitation, 4 edema, 2 arterial hypertension, 2 acute myocardial infarction) that were not predicted by the in-depth CV evaluation, and that led to ANA withdrawal in only one case (non-cardiac refractory edema). In conclusion, the planned in-depth CV evaluation did not appear to be necessary in ET patients to evaluate their suitability for ANA treatment, and, moreover, was not able to predict the occurrence of CV adverse events during ANA treatment. Nevertheless, the CV adverse events (mostly palpitations and edema) were easily managed by the hematologists, and required the cardiologist involvement in very few selected cases.Entities:
Keywords: Anagrelide; Cardiovascular adverse events; Cardiovascular evaluation; Edema; Essential thrombocythemia; Palpitation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25850727 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.03.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156