Literature DB >> 2585048

Intra-axonal recordings of cutaneous primary afferents during fictive locomotion in the cat.

J P Gossard1, J M Cabelguen, S Rossignol.   

Abstract

1. Cutaneous primary afferents were recorded intracellularly during fictive locomotion in decorticated cats with the goal of improving our understanding of how locomotor networks might centrally control the transmission in cutaneous pathways at a presynaptic level. 2. Identified cutaneous axons from superficialis peroneal nerve (SP) or tibialis posterior nerve (TP) were recorded intracellularly together with the electroneurograms (ENGs) of representative flexor and extensor muscle nerves of the hindlimb as well as dorsal root potential from L6 or L7 (DRP). Fictive locomotion occurred spontaneously after decortication (n = 12) or was induced by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) (n = 6). 3. The results revealed that all cutaneous axons (82 units with resting potential greater than 45 mV) showed fluctuations of their membrane potential (greater than or equal to 0.5 mV) at the rhythm of the fictive locomotion. The characteristics of fluctuation patterns, common to all cutaneous units, consisted of two depolarization waves per cycle: one related to the flexor activity, the other related to the extensor activity. The flexor-related depolarization was followed by a sharp trough of membrane repolarization. The extensor-related depolarization usually overlapped partly with the flexor-depolarization of the following cycle. The relative size of each depolarization could vary among different afferents of the same nerve in the same animal. Hence, maximal depolarization could occur in different parts of the locomotor cycle, but, for the majority of units (82%), it occurred during the flexor activity. These results were similar for SP and TP units. 4. Twenty percent of the units were discharging with a constant or irregular frequency. Phasic antidromic discharges related to locomotor ENGs were rarely encountered (5/82 units). 5. Linear regression analysis of the temporal relationships between fluctuations of membrane potential of cutaneous axons and locomotor bursts over several cycles showed that the timing of presynaptic events in cutaneous afferents is related to the events of the locomotor output. However, the same type of analysis showed that the amplitude of axonal depolarizations and the amplitude of flexor and extensor locomotor bursts could vary independently. Tight temporal relationships were also found between the depolarizations recorded in cutaneous units and the fluctuations recorded at the dorsal root level (DRP). 6. Based on the assumption that the locomotor fluctuations of cutaneous membrane potential are mediated through the primary afferent depolarization (PAD) pathways associated with presynaptic inhibition, it is proposed that the central pattern generator for locomotion (CPG) could phasically control the efficacy of transmission of cutaneous pathways at a presynaptic level as part of the locomotor program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2585048     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.5.1177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Shunting versus inactivation: analysis of presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms in primary afferents of the crayfish.

Authors:  D Cattaert; A El Manira
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stance-phase force on the opposite limb dictates swing-phase afferent presynaptic inhibition during locomotion.

Authors:  Heather Brant Hayes; Young-Hui Chang; Shawn Hochman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Differential control of short latency cutaneous excitation in cat FDL motoneurons during fictive locomotion.

Authors:  A K Moschovakis; G N Sholomenko; R E Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Spinal interneurons providing input to the final common path during locomotion.

Authors:  Robert M Brownstone; Tuan V Bui
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Heterosynaptic modulation of the dorsal root potential in the turtle spinal cord in vitro.

Authors:  Raúl E Russo; Rodolfo Delgado-Lezama; Jørn Hounsgaard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Task-dependent modulation of primary afferent depolarization in cervical spinal cord of monkeys performing an instructed delay task.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Seki; Steve I Perlmutter; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The modulation of presynaptic inhibition in single muscle primary afferents during fictive locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  A Ménard; H Leblond; J P Gossard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Invertebrate presynaptic inhibition and motor control.

Authors:  F Clarac; D Cattaert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Muscle afferent excitability testing in spinal root-intact rats: dissociating peripheral afferent and efferent volleys generated by intraspinal microstimulation.

Authors:  Saeka Tomatsu; Geehee Kim; Joachim Confais; Kazuhiko Seki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Force-sensitive afferents recruited during stance encode sensory depression in the contralateral swinging limb during locomotion.

Authors:  Shawn Hochman; Heather Brant Hayes; Iris Speigel; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.