Literature DB >> 25850110

Clutter in electronic medical records: examining its performance and attentional costs using eye tracking.

Nadine Moacdieh1, Nadine Sarter2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to use eye tracking to trace the underlying changes in attention allocation associated with the performance effects of clutter, stress, and task difficulty in visual search and noticing tasks.
BACKGROUND: Clutter can degrade performance in complex domains, yet more needs to be known about the associated changes in attention allocation, particularly in the presence of stress and for different tasks. Frequently used and relatively simple eye tracking metrics do not effectively capture the various effects of clutter, which is critical for comprehensively analyzing clutter and developing targeted, real-time countermeasures.
METHOD: Electronic medical records (EMRs) were chosen as the application domain for this research. Clutter, stress, and task difficulty were manipulated, and physicians' performance on search and noticing tasks was recorded. Several eye tracking metrics were used to trace attention allocation throughout those tasks, and subjective data were gathered via a debriefing questionnaire.
RESULTS: Clutter degraded performance in terms of response time and noticing accuracy. These decrements were largely accentuated by high stress and task difficulty. Eye tracking revealed the underlying attentional mechanisms, and several display-independent metrics were shown to be significant indicators of the effects of clutter.
CONCLUSION: Eye tracking provides a promising means to understand in detail (offline) and prevent (in real time) major performance breakdowns due to clutter. APPLICATION: Display designers need to be aware of the risks of clutter in EMRs and other complex displays and can use the identified eye tracking metrics to evaluate and/or adjust their display.
© 2015, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; display design; medical informatics; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850110     DOI: 10.1177/0018720814564594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

1.  Electronic Health Records and Improved Patient Care: Opportunities for Applied Psychology.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08

2.  Why aren't they happy? An analysis of end-user satisfaction with Electronic health records.

Authors:  Prasad Unni; Catherine Staes; Howard Weeks; Heidi Kramer; Damion Borbolla; Stacey Slager; Teresa Taft; Valliammai Chidambaram; Charlene Weir
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  I-CATCH: A Novel Bundle to Improve Postcall Morning Handoffs.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zipursky; Gousia Dhhar; Adina Weinerman; Lynfa Stroud; Brian M Wong
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-12

4.  Turning Electromyography Reports Upside Down: A Pilot Study Surveying Referring Providers.

Authors:  Anant M Shenoy; Kate G Baquis; George D Baquis
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2016-06-23

5.  Eye-tracking for clinical decision support: A method to capture automatically what physicians are viewing in the EMR.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Harry Hochheiser; Shyam Visweswaran; Gilles Clermont; Gregory F Cooper
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2017-07-26

6.  Leveraging Eye Tracking to Prioritize Relevant Medical Record Data: Comparative Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Gregory F Cooper; Gilles Clermont; Harry Hochheiser; Milos Hauskrecht; Dean F Sittig; Shyam Visweswaran
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.