Literature DB >> 2584981

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5-6-year follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component.

S C Kozinn1, C Marx, R D Scott.   

Abstract

The results in the first 50 patients to receive an improved-design unicompartmental knee prosthesis were reviewed after an average follow-up period of 5.5 years. The prosthesis is composed of a metal-backed polyethylene tibial component and a wide femoral surface replacement that are fixed to bone with acrylic cement. Forty-five patients with 55 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were available for clinical study. Ninety-two percent of the knees were rated as having a good or excellent result, and 94% had lasting relief of pain. There have been no failures requiring revision. A radiographic review demonstrated that no tibial component was bordered by a complete radiolucent line. There was no subsidence or loosening of either the tibial or femoral components, and there was no instance of local osteolysis. These results, coupled with a 14-year follow-up experience with the original-design unicondylar prosthesis, encourages the authors to remain advocates of this procedure in selected patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584981     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(89)80001-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  [The causes of failures in unicondylar knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  B Maudhuit
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

2.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Early functional outcome after lateral UKA is sensitive to postoperative lower limb alignment.

Authors:  J P van der List; H Chawla; J C Villa; H A Zuiderbaan; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Radiological outcomes following manual and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gregory S Kazarian; Robert L Barrack; Toby N Barrack; Charles M Lawrie; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-03

7.  Does location of patellofemoral chondral lesion influence outcome after Oxford medial compartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Konan; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Therapeutic Effects Comparison and Revision Case Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Under 60 years: A 2-6-year Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Zhang Ziqi; Mei Yufeng; Zhang Lei; Wang Chunsheng; Yang Pei; Wang Kunzheng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.