| Literature DB >> 25849662 |
Dengke Zhang1,2, Yanxia Pang3, Weixiong Cai1, Rachel L Fazio4, Jianrong Ge2, Qiaorong Su2, Shuiqin Xu2, Yinan Pan2, Sanmei Chen2, Hongwei Zhang2.
Abstract
Impairment of theory of mind (ToM) is a common phenomenon following traumatic brain injury (TBI) that has clear effects on patients' social functioning. A growing body of research has focused on this area, and several methods have been developed to assess ToM deficiency. Although an informant assessment scale would be useful for examining individuals with TBI, very few studies have adopted this approach. The purpose of the present study was to develop an informant assessment scale of ToM for adults with traumatic brain injury (IASToM-aTBI) and to test its reliability and validity with 196 adults with TBI and 80 normal adults. A 44-item scale was developed following a literature review, interviews with patient informants, consultations with experts, item analysis, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The following three common factors were extracted: social interaction, understanding of beliefs, and understanding of emotions. The psychometric analyses indicate that the scale has good internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, structural validity, discriminate validity and criterion validity. These results provide preliminary evidence that supports the reliability and validity of the IASToM-aTBI as a ToM assessment tool for adults with TBI.Entities:
Keywords: Informant assessment scale; Reliability; Theory of mind; Traumatic brain injury; Validity
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25849662 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1030431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychol Rehabil ISSN: 0960-2011 Impact factor: 2.868