| Literature DB >> 25849544 |
Sanghyeb Lee1, Jens Gregor2, Stephen J Kennel3, Dustin R Osborne4, Jonathan Wall3.
Abstract
This paper addresses 123I and 125I dual isotope SPECT imaging, which can be challenging because of spectrum overlap in the low energy spectrums of these isotopes. We first quantify the contribution of low-energy photons from each isotope using GATE-based Monte Carlo simulations for the MOBY mouse phantom. We then describe and analyze a simple, but effective method that uses the ratio of detected low and high energy 123I activity to separate the mixed low energy 123I and 125I activities. Performance is compared with correction methods used in conventional tissue biodistribution techniques. The results indicate that the spectrum overlap effects can be significantly reduced, if not entirely eliminated, when attenuation and scatter is either absent or corrected for using standard methods. In particular, we show that relative activity levels of the two isotopes can be accurately estimated for a wide range of organs and provide quantitative validation that standard methods for spectrum overlap correction provide reasonable estimates for reasonable corrections in small-animal SPECT/CT imaging.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25849544 PMCID: PMC4388517 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Stacked bar plots of energy ratios and relative activity measurements.
a). Low-to-high energy ratio e123 under different imaging conditions. b). Total 123I activity in both high and low-energy windows.
Fig 2Comparison of real and simulated data.
The top row shows real data for the uncorrected low energy window, high energy window, and the corrected low energy window. The bottom row shows the same information but for the simulated MOBY phantom data.
Estimated low-to-high energy (e123) ratios for selected organs in different sized mice.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organ | MOBY phantom size: radius (cm) /length (cm) | ||||
| 1.5/4 | 2/5 | 2/6 | 2.5/7 | 3/8 | |
| Spleen | 0.54±0.005 | 0.54±0.008 | 0.54±0.004 | 0.56±0.003 | 0.57±0.008 |
| Liver | 0.57±0.004 | 0.58±0.006 | 0.58±0.005 | 0.6±0.005 | 0.62±0.005 |
| Heart | 0.53±0.004 | 0.54±0.004 | 0.54±0.008 | 0.54±0.004 | 0.56±0.007 |
| Kidney | 0.54±0.002 | 0.55±0.004 | 0.55±0.002 | 0.57±0.004 | 0.59±0.006 |
Relative estimation error for three different imaging conditions: Ideal (no scatter medium), scatter and attenuation medium without corrections, and scatter and attenuation medium with corrections.
| Collimator | MGP | MWB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iodine Ratio | 1:1 | 1:2 | 2:1 | 1:1 | 1:2 | 2:1 |
| Ideal | 6.4%±0.3% | 3.8%±0.3% | 11.3%±0.6% | 6.8%±0.3% | 4.6%±0.6% | 14.5%±0.5% |
| w/o A+S | 16.3%±0.6% | 8.4%±0.4% | 21.1%±0.4% | 18.6%±0.7% | 9.2%±0.5% | 32.3%±0.6% |
| w/ A+S | 7.1%±0.4% | 3.6%±0.4% | 11.3%±0.7% | 11.2%±0.5% | 5.9%±0.4% | 19.2%±0.2% |
Fig 3Illustrations of model components.
a). GATE model of Siemens Inveon SPECT system configured with two MGP collimators. b). MWB collimator. c). MOBY attenuation phantom.
Fig 4Energy spectra of 123I and 125I for the MGP collimator.