Literature DB >> 25848811

Transition States and transition state analogue interactions with enzymes.

Vern L Schramm1.   

Abstract

Enzymatic transition states have lifetimes of a few femtoseconds (fs). Computational analysis of enzyme motions leading to transition state formation suggests that local catalytic site motions on the fs time scale provide the mechanism to locate transition states. An experimental test of protein fs motion and its relation to transition state formation can be provided by isotopically heavy proteins. Heavy enzymes have predictable mass-altered bond vibration states without altered electrostatic properties, according to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. On-enzyme chemistry is slowed in most heavy proteins, consistent with altered protein bond frequencies slowing the search for the transition state. In other heavy enzymes, structural changes involved in reactant binding and release are also influenced. Slow protein motions associated with substrate binding and catalytic site preorganization are essential to allow the subsequent fs motions to locate the transition state and to facilitate the efficient release of products. In the catalytically competent geometry, local groups move in stochastic atomic motion on the fs time scale, within transition state-accessible conformations created by slower protein motions. The fs time scale for the transition state motions does not permit thermodynamic equilibrium between the transition state and stable enzyme states. Isotopically heavy enzymes provide a diagnostic tool for fast coupled protein motions to transition state formation and mass-dependent conformational changes. The binding of transition state analogue inhibitors is the opposite in catalytic time scale to formation of the transition state but is related by similar geometries of the enzyme-transition state and enzyme-inhibitor interactions. While enzymatic transition states have lifetimes as short as 10(-15) s, transition state analogues can bind tightly to enzymes with release rates greater than 10(3) s. Tight-binding transition state analogues stabilize the rare but evolved enzymatic geometry to form the transition state. Evolution to efficient catalysis optimized this geometry and its stabilization by a transition state mimic results in tight binding. Release rates of transition state analogues are orders of magnitude slower than product release in normal catalytic function. During catalysis, product release is facilitated by altered chemistry. Compared to the weak associations found in Michaelis complexes, transition state analogues involve strong interactions related to those in the transition state. Optimum binding of transition state analogues occurs when the complex retains the system motions intrinsic to transition state formation. Conserved dynamic motion retains the entropic components of inhibitor complexes, improving the thermodynamics of analogue binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25848811      PMCID: PMC4482137          DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  42 in total

1.  Flight of a cytidine deaminase complex with an imperfect transition state analogue inhibitor: mass spectrometric evidence for the presence of a trapped water molecule.

Authors:  Gottfried K Schroeder; Li Zhou; Mark J Snider; Xian Chen; Richard Wolfenden
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Catalytic site conformations in human PNP by 19F-NMR and crystallography.

Authors:  Javier Suarez; Antti M Haapalainen; Sean M Cahill; Meng-Chiao Ho; Funing Yan; Steven C Almo; Vern L Schramm
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2013-02-21

3.  Transition state analogues for enzyme catalysis.

Authors:  R Wolfenden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Four generations of transition-state analogues for human purine nucleoside phosphorylase.

Authors:  Meng-Chiao Ho; Wuxian Shi; Agnes Rinaldo-Matthis; Peter C Tyler; Gary B Evans; Keith Clinch; Steven C Almo; Vern L Schramm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Structural analyses reveal two distinct families of nucleoside phosphorylases.

Authors:  Matthew J Pugmire; Steven E Ealick
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  Catalytic efficiency of enzymes: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Mass Modulation of Protein Dynamics Associated with Barrier Crossing in Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase.

Authors:  Dimitri Antoniou; Xiaoxia Ge; Vern L Schramm; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 6.475

Review 8.  Protein dynamics and the enzymatic reaction coordinate.

Authors:  Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2013

9.  Barrier Crossing in Dihydrofolate Reductasedoes not involve a rate-promoting vibration.

Authors:  Mariangela Dametto; Dimitri Antoniou; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  Mol Phys       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.962

10.  Probing the electrostatics of active site microenvironments along the catalytic cycle for Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  C Tony Liu; Joshua P Layfield; Robert J Stewart; Jarrod B French; Philip Hanoian; John B Asbury; Sharon Hammes-Schiffer; Stephen J Benkovic
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  18 in total

1.  Resolution of Submillisecond Kinetics of Multiple Reaction Pathways for Lactate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Michael J Reddish; Robert Callender; R Brian Dyer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  What Mutagenesis Can and Cannot Reveal About Allostery.

Authors:  Gerald M Carlson; Aron W Fenton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Mechanistic enzymology in drug discovery: a fresh perspective.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Holdgate; Thomas D Meek; Rachel L Grimley
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  The Michaelis Complex of Arginine Kinase Samples the Transition State at a Frequency That Matches the Catalytic Rate.

Authors:  Yu Peng; Alexandar L Hansen; Lei Bruschweiler-Li; Omar Davulcu; Jack J Skalicky; Michael S Chapman; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Isotope effect analyses provide evidence for an altered transition state for RNA 2'-O-transphosphorylation catalyzed by Zn(2+).

Authors:  Shuming Zhang; Hong Gu; Haoyuan Chen; Emily Strong; Edward W Ollie; Daniel Kellerman; Danni Liang; Masaru Miyagi; Vernon E Anderson; Joseph A Piccirilli; Darrin M York; Michael E Harris
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Modulating Enzyme Activity by Altering Protein Dynamics with Solvent.

Authors:  Michael R Duff; Jose M Borreguero; Matthew J Cuneo; Arvind Ramanathan; Junhong He; Ganesh Kamath; S Chakra Chennubhotla; Flora Meilleur; Elizabeth E Howell; Kenneth W Herwig; Dean A A Myles; Pratul K Agarwal
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  QM/MM Analysis of Transition States and Transition State Analogues in Metalloenzymes.

Authors:  D Roston; Q Cui
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Inverse heavy enzyme isotope effects in methylthioadenosine nucleosidases.

Authors:  Morais Brown; Ioanna Zoi; Dimitri Antoniou; Hilda A Namanja-Magliano; Steven D Schwartz; Vern L Schramm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Protein Mass Effects on Formate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Chethya Ranasinghe; Qi Guo; Paul J Sapienza; Andrew L Lee; Daniel M Quinn; Christopher M Cheatum; Amnon Kohen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 16.383

10.  Side Chain Conformation Restriction in the Catalysis of Glycosidic Bond Formation by Leloir Glycosyltransferases, Glycoside Phosphorylases, and Transglycosidases.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Quirke; David Crich
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 13.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.