Literature DB >> 25848117

Estimation of staff lens doses during interventional procedures. Comparing cardiology, neuroradiology and interventional radiology.

E Vano1, R M Sanchez2, J M Fernandez2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to estimate lens doses using over apron active personal dosemeters in interventional catheterisation laboratories (cardiology IC, neuroradiology IN and radiology IR) and to investigate correlations between occupational lens doses and patient doses. Active electronic personal dosemeters placed over the lead apron were used on a sample of 204 IC procedures, 274 IN and 220 IR (all performed at the same university hospital). Patient dose values (kerma area product) were also recorded to evaluate correlations with occupational doses. Operators used the ceiling-suspended screen in most cases. The median and third quartile values of equivalent dose Hp(10) per procedure measured over the apron for IC, IN and IR resulted, respectively, in 21/67, 19/44 and 24/54 µSv. Patient dose values (median/third quartile) were 75/128, 83/176 and 61/159 Gy cm(2), respectively. The median ratios for dosemeters worn over the apron by operators (protected by the ceiling-suspended screen) and patient doses were 0.36; 0.21 and 0.46 µSv Gy(-1) cm(-2), respectively. With the conservative approach used (lens doses estimated from the over apron chest dosemeter) we came to the conclusion that more than 800 procedures y(-1) and per operator were necessary to reach the new lens dose limit for the three interventional specialties.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25848117     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  6 in total

1.  High filtration in interventional practices reduces patient radiation doses but not always scatter radiation doses.

Authors:  Roberto M Sanchez; Eliseo Vano; Pablo Salinas; Nieves Gonzalo; Javier Escaned; Jose M Fernández
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Get Protected! Recommendations for Staff in IR.

Authors:  Gabriel Bartal; Eliseo Vano; Graciano Paulo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Radiation protection of the eye lens in medical workers--basis and impact of the ICRP recommendations.

Authors:  Stephen Gr Barnard; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Roy A Quinlan; Simon D Bouffler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology/Cardiology-Is State-of-the-Art Equipment Used?

Authors:  Christiane Behr-Meenen; Heiner von Boetticher; Jan Felix Kersten; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Estimating radiation exposure of the brain of a physician with a protective flap in interventional radiology: A phantom study.

Authors:  Shota Hattori; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Hiroyuki Kosaka; Yasunori Nakamura; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Assessment of eye doses to staff involved in interventional cardiology procedures in Kuwait.

Authors:  Meshari Alnaaimi; Mousa Alduaij; Faisal Shenawy; Musab Algaily; Talal Mohammedzein; Mohamed Shaaban; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.