Literature DB >> 25847979

Optimal medical therapy improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial at the 5-year follow-up.

Javaid Iqbal1, Yao-Jun Zhang1, David R Holmes1, Marie-Claude Morice1, Michael J Mack1, Arie Pieter Kappetein1, Ted Feldman1, Elizabeth Stahle1, Javier Escaned1, Adrian P Banning1, Julian P Gunn1, Antonio Colombo1, Ewout W Steyerberg1, Friedrich W Mohr1, Patrick W Serruys2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the use of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its long-term prognostic significance. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial is a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial of patients (n=1800) with complex coronary disease randomized to revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG. Detailed drug history was collected for all patients at discharge and at the 1-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups. OMT was defined as the combination of at least 1 antiplatelet drug, statin, β-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker. Five-year clinical outcomes were stratified by OMT and non-OMT. OMT was underused in patients treated with coronary revascularization, especially CABG. OMT was an independent predictor of survival. OMT was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.85; P=0.002) and composite end point of death/myocardial infarction/stroke (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.92; P=0.007) at the 5-year follow-up. The treatment effect with OMT (36% relative reduction in mortality over 5 years) was greater than the treatment effect of revascularization strategy (26% relative reduction in mortality with CABG versus percutaneous coronary intervention over 5 years). On stratified analysis, all the components of OMT were important for reducing adverse outcomes regardless of revascularization strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of OMT remains low in patients with complex coronary disease requiring coronary intervention with percutaneous coronary intervention and even lower in patients treated with CABG. Lack of OMT is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Targeted strategies to improve OMT use in postrevascularization patients are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00114972.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass; coronary artery disease; stents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847979     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  42 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jithendhar Kandimalla; Zain Hussain; Paisith Piriyawat; Gustavo Rodriguez; Alberto Maud; Rakesh Khatri; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Anantha R Vellipuram
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Why Optimal Medical Therapy Should Be a Universal Standard of Care.

Authors:  David J Maron; William E Boden
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy and concomitant optimal medical therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

4.  Prognostic superiority of coronary artery bypass grafting to percutaneous coronary intervention in non-diabetic patients with anatomically complex multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kenji Sakata; Takuya Nakahashi; Masa-Aki Kawashiri
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

5.  Optimal medical therapy is vital for patients with coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes regardless of revascularization strategy.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Constanze Strüning; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Yasin Essa; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study.

Authors:  Charles D Resor; Ashwin Nathan; Dean J Kereiakes; Robert W Yeh; Joseph M Massaro; Donald E Cutlip; P Gabriel Steg; Wen-Hua Hsieh; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Medical Therapy With Versus Without Revascularization in Stable Patients With Moderate and Severe Ischemia: The Case for Community Equipoise.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Judith S Hochman; David O Williams; William E Boden; T Bruce Ferguson; Robert A Harrington; David J Maron
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Challenges with Evidence-Based Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Amit V Patel; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Baseline Predictors of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Systolic Blood Pressure Goal Attainment After 1 Year in the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan D Newman; Karen P Alexander; Xiangqiong Gu; Sean M O'Brien; William E Boden; Sajeev C Govindan; Roxy Senior; Nagaraja Moorthy; Paulo C Rezende; Marcin Demkow; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Olga Bockeria; Neeraj Pandit; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter H Stone; John A Spertus; Gregg W Stone; Jerome L Fleg; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.