Literature DB >> 25847523

Equivocal ALK fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) cases may benefit from ancillary ALK FISH probe testing.

Christina Selinger1, Wendy Cooper1,2,3, Trina Lum1, Catriona McNeil4, Adrienne Morey5, Paul Waring6, Benhur Amanuel7,8, Michael Millward9,10, Joanne Peverall7, Chris Van Vliet7,8, Michael Christie6,11, Yen Tran12, Connie Diakos13, Nick Pavlakis13, Anthony J Gill3,13,14, Sandra O'Toole1,15.   

Abstract

AIMS: Accurate assessment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) is critical to identify patients who are likely to respond to crizotinib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ALK/EML4 TriCheck FISH probe in a series of NSCLCs enriched for tumours with equivocal ALK status. METHODS AND
RESULTS: ALK FISH was prospectively performed on 45 NSCLCs with the ALK/EML4 TriCheck probe (ZytoVision) and the Vysis ALK break-apart probe (Abbott Molecular). ALK immunohistochemistry was performed with 5A4 and D5F3 antibodies. Fourteen cases had equivocal ALK status, based on borderline or focal FISH positivity, an atypical FISH pattern, or discrepancy between ALK FISH and immunohistochemistry. Four of the 14 equivocal cases showed discordance between the two FISH probes. All other cases were concordant. The TriCheck probe showed that, of 31 unequivocal cases, 15 were ALK-rearranged, and 60% of these had EML4 as the translocation partner. Within the group of 14 equivocal cases, 12 showed rearrangement with the Tricheck probe; only one of these showed EML4 rearrangement. Of the six equivocal cases that received crizotinib, four showed clinical benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: The ALK/EML4 TriCheck FISH probe may be useful for the detection of ALK rearrangements, especially in borderline or atypical cases, where an additional unique ALK FISH probe may provide further confirmation of rearrangement.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaplastic lymphoma kinase; fluorescence in-situ hybridization; lung adenocarcinoma; non-small-cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847523     DOI: 10.1111/his.12708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  6 in total

1.  ALK detection in lung cancer: identification of atypical and cryptic ALK rearrangements using an optimal algorithm.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liu; Shafei Wu; Xiaohua Shi; Zhiyong Liang; Xuan Zeng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  ALK in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Pathobiology, Epidemiology, Detection from Tumor Tissue and Algorithm Diagnosis in a Daily Practice.

Authors:  Paul Hofman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  An Update on Predictive Biomarkers for Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Tamkin Ahmadzada; Steven Kao; Glen Reid; Michael Boyer; Annabelle Mahar; Wendy A Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Rearrangement in Lung Cancer: Clinically Relevant Technical Aspects.

Authors:  Zhenya Tang; Lu Wang; Guilin Tang; L Jeffrey Medeiros
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  ALK (D5F3) CDx: an immunohistochemistry assay to identify ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

Authors:  Hironori Uruga; Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 6.  Molecular diagnosis in non-small-cell lung cancer: expert opinion on ALK and ROS1 testing.

Authors:  Esther Conde; Federico Rojo; Javier Gómez; Ana Belén Enguita; Ihab Abdulkader; Ana González; Dolores Lozano; Nuria Mancheño; Clara Salas; Marta Salido; Eduardo Salido-Ruiz; Enrique de Álava
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.