Victoria A McQuiddy1, Carol R Scheerer2, Ryan Lavalley2, Timothy McGrath2, Li Lin3. 1. Division of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: Victoria.mcquiddy@cchmc.org. 2. Department of Occupational Therapy, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH. 3. Center for Professional Excellence Research & Evidence-Based Practice, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To provide current normative data for grip and pinch strength in children and young adults aged 6 to 19 years as well as to examine the effect of age, sex, and hand dominance on grip and pinch strength. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional. SETTING: Two grade schools, 2 high schools, and 1 university. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=1508; 741 male students and 767 female students) aged 6 to 19 years. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Means and SDs were calculated for each strength measurement (grip, tip pinch, lateral pinch, palmar pinch) and stratified by age and sex. Analysis of covariance and 2-sample t tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The analyses demonstrated that age and sex had a significant effect on hand strength values, as evidenced by increasing hand strength with age as well as greater hand strength in males than in females. Hand dominance was not shown to have a significant effect on hand strength. The results of this study were statistically significantly different from previously published normative values, with most hand strength values being lower than those published 28 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: Having updated normative data are paramount for rehabilitation practitioners to compare the grip and pinch strength of their clients with the average values to objectively assess impairment and tracking progress. The statistical significance observed for most data collected in this study as compared with those previously published supports the need for continually updating normative data.
OBJECTIVES: To provide current normative data for grip and pinch strength in children and young adults aged 6 to 19 years as well as to examine the effect of age, sex, and hand dominance on grip and pinch strength. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional. SETTING: Two grade schools, 2 high schools, and 1 university. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=1508; 741 male students and 767 female students) aged 6 to 19 years. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Means and SDs were calculated for each strength measurement (grip, tip pinch, lateral pinch, palmar pinch) and stratified by age and sex. Analysis of covariance and 2-sample t tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The analyses demonstrated that age and sex had a significant effect on hand strength values, as evidenced by increasing hand strength with age as well as greater hand strength in males than in females. Hand dominance was not shown to have a significant effect on hand strength. The results of this study were statistically significantly different from previously published normative values, with most hand strength values being lower than those published 28 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: Having updated normative data are paramount for rehabilitation practitioners to compare the grip and pinch strength of their clients with the average values to objectively assess impairment and tracking progress. The statistical significance observed for most data collected in this study as compared with those previously published supports the need for continually updating normative data.
Authors: Edith V Sullivan; Ty Brumback; Susan F Tapert; Rosemary Fama; Devin Prouty; Sandra A Brown; Kevin Cummins; Wesley K Thompson; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Michael D De Bellis; Stephen R Hooper; Duncan B Clark; Tammy Chung; Bonnie J Nagel; B Nolan Nichols; Torsten Rohlfing; Weiwei Chu; Kilian M Pohl; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Chao-Ying Chen; Corey W McGee; Tonya L Rich; Cecília N Prudente; Bernadette T Gillick Journal: J Hand Ther Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Elizabeth Hotham; Miranda Haberfield; Susan Hillier; Jason M White; Gabrielle Todd Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Edith V Sullivan; Wesley K Thompson; Ty Brumback; Devin Prouty; Susan F Tapert; Sandra A Brown; Michael D De Bellis; Kate B Nooner; Fiona C Baker; Ian M Colrain; Duncan B Clark; Bonnie J Nagel; Kilian M Pohl; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.612
Authors: Parker B Goodell; Andrea S Bauer; Scott Oishi; Marianne Arner; Tobias Laurell; Sandra L Taylor; Michelle A James Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 5.284