Literature DB >> 25847069

Effects of aging on evoked retrusive tongue actions.

Benjamin J Becker1, John A Russell1, Nadine P Connor2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tongue strength, timing, and coordination deficits may underlie age-related swallowing function. Retrusive tongue actions are likely important in retrograde bolus transport. However, age-related changes in retrusive tongue muscle contractile properties have not been identified in animal studies. Because previous studies employed whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation that activated both protrusive and retrusive tongue muscles, co-contraction may have masked retrusive muscle force decrements. The hypotheses of this study were: (1) retrusive tongue muscle contraction forces would be diminished and temporal characteristics prolonged in old rats when lateral nerves were selectively activated, and (2) greater muscle contractile forces with selective lateral branch stimulation would be found relative to whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation.
DESIGN: Nineteen Fischer 344/Brown Norway rats (9 old, 10 young adult) underwent tongue muscle contractile property recording elicited by: (1) bilateral whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation, and (2) selective lateral branch stimulation. Twitch contraction time (CT), half-decay time, maximal twitch and tetanic forces, and a fatigue index were measured.
RESULTS: For whole nerve stimulation, CT was significantly longer in the old group. No significant age group differences were found with selective lateral nerve stimulation. Significantly reduced twitch forces (old group only), increased tetanic forces and significantly less fatigue were found with selective lateral nerve stimulation than with whole hypoglossal stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Retrusive tongue forces are not impaired in old rats. Deficits observed in swallowing with aging may be due to other factors such as inadequate bolus propulsive forces, mediated by protrusive tongue muscles, or timing/coordination of muscle actions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Hypoglossal nerve; Tongue

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847069      PMCID: PMC4420698          DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  37 in total

1.  Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages.

Authors:  J Robbins; J W Hamilton; G L Lof; G B Kempster
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Quantitative contributions of the muscles of the tongue, floor-of-mouth, jaw, and velum to tongue-to-palate pressure generation.

Authors:  Phyllis M Palmer; Debra M Jaffe; Timothy M McCulloch; Eileen M Finnegan; Douglas J Van Daele; Erich S Luschei
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The relationship of aspiration status with tongue and handgrip strength in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Susan G Butler; Andrew Stuart; Xiaoyan Leng; Erika Wilhelm; Catherine Rees; Jeff Williamson; Stephen B Kritchevsky
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Quantitative aspects of swallowing in an elderly nondysphagic population.

Authors:  H Nilsson; O Ekberg; R Olsson; B Hindfelt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults.

Authors:  JoAnne Robbins; Ronald E Gangnon; Shannon M Theis; Stephanie A Kays; Angela L Hewitt; Jacqueline A Hind
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Alterations in contractile properties of tongue muscles in old rats.

Authors:  Fumikazu Ota; Nadine P Connor; Richard Konopacki
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Age and sex differences in orofacial strength.

Authors:  Heather M Clark; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Co-activation of tongue protrudor and retractor muscles during chemoreceptor stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  D Fuller; J H Mateika; R F Fregosi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy belgian adults.

Authors:  Jan Vanderwegen; Cindy Guns; Gwen Van Nuffelen; Rik Elen; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Effect of aging on tongue protrusion forces in rats.

Authors:  Hiromi Nagai; John A Russell; Michelle A Jackson; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  6 in total

1.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of the Rat Tongue.

Authors:  Emanuele Loro; Stephen H Wang; Richard J Schwab; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Age-related effect of cell death on fiber morphology and number in tongue muscle.

Authors:  Heidi Kletzien; Allison J Hare; Glen Leverson; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Myogenic marker expression as a function of age and exercise-based therapy in the tongue.

Authors:  Heidi Kletzien; Cynthia A Kelm-Nelson; Sabrina Wang; Masatoshi Suzuki; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.032

4.  Age-related alterations in swallowing biomechanics.

Authors:  Heidi Kletzien; Miranda J Cullins; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.032

5.  Tongue muscle contractile, fatigue, and fiber type properties in rats.

Authors:  Matthew J Fogarty; Gary C Sieck
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2021-07-29

6.  Progressive Protrusive Tongue Exercise Does Not Alter Aging Effects in Retrusive Tongue Muscles.

Authors:  Tiffany J Glass; Joanie E Figueroa; John A Russell; Brittany N Krekeler; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.