OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of aortic arch variants in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: CAS is increasingly carried out to treat the patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Aortic arch anatomy may influence its feasibility and affect clinical outcome. METHODS: Aortic arch digital subtraction angiography was systematically performed before CAS. Aortic arch elongation and bovine arch variants were recorded. Catheter manipulation time (CMT) was assessed for each patient. Adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events were assessed at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 282 consecutive patients undergoing CAS under proximal balloon occlusion (57.8%) or distal filter (42.2%) neuroprotection were enrolled (age, 72 ± 7 years; 72.7% males). Type II and III elongation variants were detected in 23.4% and 10.6% of patients, respectively; in total, 20.5% of the patients had bovine configuration. CMT was significantly influenced by aortic elongation (56.1 ± 16.5 min in patients with type III aortic arch configuration compared to 38.2 ± 11.6 min in patients with type I or type II, P < 0.01) and (in left ICA) by bovine configuration (49.2 ± 11.4 min in bovine variants vs. 37.7 ± 11.5 min in patients with nonbovine anatomy, P < 0.001). CMT, but not aortic arch anatomy, resulted the only independent predictor of 30-day adverse outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.10, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse aortic arch anatomies are frequently encountered in CAS procedures and are associated to longer procedural times. A longer CMT increases the risk for adverse outcome. These data suggest that a careful procedure planning aimed at a reduction of CMT may be pivotal to improve the safety of CAS procedures.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of aortic arch variants in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND:CAS is increasingly carried out to treat the patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Aortic arch anatomy may influence its feasibility and affect clinical outcome. METHODS: Aortic arch digital subtraction angiography was systematically performed before CAS. Aortic arch elongation and bovine arch variants were recorded. Catheter manipulation time (CMT) was assessed for each patient. Adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events were assessed at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 282 consecutive patients undergoing CAS under proximal balloon occlusion (57.8%) or distal filter (42.2%) neuroprotection were enrolled (age, 72 ± 7 years; 72.7% males). Type II and III elongation variants were detected in 23.4% and 10.6% of patients, respectively; in total, 20.5% of the patients had bovine configuration. CMT was significantly influenced by aortic elongation (56.1 ± 16.5 min in patients with type III aortic arch configuration compared to 38.2 ± 11.6 min in patients with type I or type II, P < 0.01) and (in left ICA) by bovine configuration (49.2 ± 11.4 min in bovine variants vs. 37.7 ± 11.5 min in patients with nonbovine anatomy, P < 0.001). CMT, but not aortic arch anatomy, resulted the only independent predictor of 30-day adverse outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.10, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse aortic arch anatomies are frequently encountered in CAS procedures and are associated to longer procedural times. A longer CMT increases the risk for adverse outcome. These data suggest that a careful procedure planning aimed at a reduction of CMT may be pivotal to improve the safety of CAS procedures.
Authors: J A Knox; M D Alexander; D B McCoy; D C Murph; P J Hinckley; J C Ch'ang; C F Dowd; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; M R Amans; S W Hetts; D L Cooke Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Maiwand Sidiq; Emilia Scheidecker; Arne Potreck; Ulf Neuberger; Charlotte S Weyland; Sibu Mundiyanapurath; Martin Bendszus; Markus A Möhlenbruch; Fatih Seker Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Mingxue Jing; Joshua Y P Yeo; Staffan Holmin; Tommy Andersson; Fabian Arnberg; Paul Bhogal; Cunli Yang; Anil Gopinathan; Tian Ming Tu; Benjamin Yong Qiang Tan; Ching Hui Sia; Hock Luen Teoh; Prakash R Paliwal; Bernard P L Chan; Vijay Sharma; Leonard L L Yeo Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Zhen Yu Jia; Sang Hun Lee; Young Eun Kim; Joon Ho Choi; Sun Moon Hwang; Ga Young Lee; Jin Ho Youn; Deok Hee Lee Journal: Neurointervention Date: 2017-09-05