Literature DB >> 25846858

Comparison of the feeding apparatus and diet of European sardines Sardina pilchardus of Atlantic and Mediterranean waters: ecological implications.

D Costalago1, S Garrido, I Palomera.   

Abstract

In this study, the feeding apparatus (gill rakers, GR) and the diet composition of European sardine Sardina pilchardus populations living in two contrasting environments were compared: the upwelling area off western Iberia and the comparatively less productive region of the north-western Mediterranean Sea. The importance of local adaptations in the trophic ecology of this species was estimated. Sardina pilchardus from the Atlantic Iberian coast and from the north-western Mediterranean Sea have clear differences in the feeding apparatus and diet compositions. Those from the Atlantic Iberian coast have significantly more GRs than S. pilchardus of the same size range in the Mediterranean Sea. While S. pilchardus from the Mediterranean Sea mostly depend on prey ranging between 750-1500 and 3000-4000 µm, corresponding mostly to cladocerans, decapods and copepods, those from the Atlantic depend on smaller prey (50-500 and 1000-1500 µm) that include phytoplankton and copepods, particularly during summer months, and S. pilchardus eggs during the winter. The marked difference between the trophic ecology of S. pilchardus in the two areas studied appears to have originated from different dietary strategies that the two populations have adopted in contrasting feeding environments. These differences are shown to profoundly affect the size and quality of prey consumed, and the effect of cannibalism on the populations.
© 2015 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diet composition; gill rakers; small pelagic fish; trophic plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25846858     DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  6 in total

1.  18S rRNA V9 metabarcoding for diet characterization: a critical evaluation with two sympatric zooplanktivorous fish species.

Authors:  Aitor Albaina; Mikel Aguirre; David Abad; María Santos; Andone Estonba
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Sharing fishers´ ethnoecological knowledge of the European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) in the westernmost fishing community in Europe.

Authors:  Heitor de Oliveira Braga; Miguel Ângelo Pardal; Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  A trophic latitudinal gradient revealed in anchovy and sardine from the Western Mediterranean Sea using a multi-proxy approach.

Authors:  Eneko Bachiller; Marta Albo-Puigserver; Joan Giménez; Maria Grazia Pennino; Neus Marí-Mena; Antonio Esteban; Elena Lloret-Lloret; Angelique Jadaud; Belén Carro; José María Bellido; Marta Coll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Identifying copepod functional groups from species functional traits.

Authors:  Fabio Benedetti; Stéphane Gasparini; Sakina-Dorothée Ayata
Journal:  J Plankton Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.455

5.  Zooplankton From a Reef System Under the Influence of the Amazon River Plume.

Authors:  Sigrid Neumann-Leitão; Pedro A M C Melo; Ralf Schwamborn; Xiomara F G Diaz; Lucas G P Figueiredo; Andrea P Silva; Renata P S Campelo; Mauro de Melo Júnior; Nuno F A C Melo; Alejandro E S F Costa; Moacyr Araújo; Dóris R A Veleda; Rodrigo L Moura; Fabiano Thompson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Dynamics of Zooplankton Composition in the Lower Northern Dvina River and Some Factors Determining Zooplankton Abundance.

Authors:  E N Imant; A P Novoselov
Journal:  Russ J Ecol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 0.684

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.