Literature DB >> 25846012

No trade-off between high and low temperature tolerance in a winter acclimatized Danish Drosophila subobscura population.

Jesper Givskov Sørensen1, Torsten Nygaard Kristensen2, Volker Loeschcke3, Mads Fristrup Schou3.   

Abstract

Coping with cold winter conditions is a major challenge for many insects. In early spring we observed newly emerged Drosophila subobscura, which had overwintered as larvae and pupae. As temperatures increase during spring these flies are faced with higher minimum and maximum temperatures in their natural microhabitat. Thus, there is a potential costly mismatch between winter and early spring acclimatization and the increased ambient temperatures later in adult life. We obtained individuals from a natural Danish population of D. subobscura and acclimated them in the laboratory to 20 °C for one generation, and compared critical thermal maximum (CTmax) and minimum (CTmin) to that of individuals collected directly from their natural microhabitat. The two populations (laboratory and field) were subsequently both held in the laboratory at 20 °C and tested for their CTmax and CTmin every third day for 28 days. At the first day of testing, field acclimatized D. subobscura had both higher heat and cold resistance compared to laboratory flies, and thereby a considerable larger thermal scope. Following transfer to the laboratory, cold and heat resistance of the field flies decreased over time relative to the laboratory flies. Despite the substantial decrease in thermal tolerances the thermal scope remained larger for field acclimatized individuals for the duration of the experiment. We conclude that flies acclimatized to their natural microhabitat had increased cold resistance, without a loss in heat tolerance. Thus while a negative correlation between cold and heat tolerance is typically observed in laboratory studies in Drosophila sp., this was not observed for field acclimatized D. subobscura in this study. We suggest that this is an adaptation to juvenile overwintering in temperate cold environments, where developmental (winter) temperatures can be much lower than temperatures experienced by reproducing adults after emergence (spring). The ability to gain cold tolerance through acclimatization without a parallel loss of heat tolerance affects thermal scope and suggests that high and low thermal tolerance act through mechanisms with different dynamics and reversibility.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cold adaptation; Critical thermal limits; Fluctuating temperatures; Overwintering; Reversibility of acclimation; Thermal scope

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25846012     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  10 in total

1.  Preservation of potassium balance is strongly associated with insect cold tolerance in the field: a seasonal study of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Heath A MacMillan; Mads F Schou; Torsten N Kristensen; Johannes Overgaard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Ontogenetic reduction in thermal tolerance is not alleviated by earlier developmental acclimation in Rana temporaria.

Authors:  Urtzi Enriquez-Urzelai; Martina Sacco; Antonio S Palacio; Pol Pintanel; Miguel Tejedo; Alfredo G Nicieza
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Strong Costs and Benefits of Winter Acclimatization in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mads Fristrup Schou; Volker Loeschcke; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Thermal fluctuations affect the transcriptome through mechanisms independent of average temperature.

Authors:  Jesper Givskov Sørensen; Mads Fristrup Schou; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Environmental heterogeneity does not affect levels of phenotypic plasticity in natural populations of three Drosophila species.

Authors:  Tommaso Manenti; Jesper G Sørensen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Comparative studies of critical physiological limits and vulnerability to environmental extremes in small ectotherms: How much environmental control is needed?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.654

7.  Effects of photoperiod on life-history and thermal stress resistance traits across populations of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Neda N Moghadam; Zorana Kurbalija Novicic; Cino Pertoldi; Torsten N Kristensen; Simon Bahrndorff
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Acclimation Effects of Natural Daily Temperature Variation on Longevity, Fecundity, and Thermal Tolerance of the Diamondback Moth (Plutella xylostella).

Authors:  Kun Xing; Fei Zhao
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Adaptation to climate change: trade-offs among responses to multiple stressors in an intertidal crustacean.

Authors:  Morgan W Kelly; Melissa B DeBiasse; Vidal A Villela; Hope L Roberts; Colleen F Cecola
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Developmental and adult acclimation impact cold and drought survival of invasive tropical Drosophila kikkawai.

Authors:  Ravi Parkash; Chanderkala Lambhod; Ankita Pathak
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.422

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.