Literature DB >> 25845654

Bevacizumab did not reduce the risk of anemia associated with chemotherapy: an up-to-date meta-analysis.

Zuo-Pei Wang1, Hai-Feng Zhang, Feng Zhang, Bao-Li Hu, Hai-Tao Wei, Yong-Yuan Guo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The risk of anemia due to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has not been well described, and new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported in recent years. We therefore conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs to fully characterize the risk of anemia with bevacizumab.
METHODS: We carried out an electronic search of Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to investigate the effects of RCTs on bevacizumab treatment on cancer patients up to October 2014, and random or fixed-effect meta-analytical models were used to assess the risk ratio (RR) of anemia due to the use of bevacizumab according to the heterogeneity of included studies.
RESULTS: A total of 13,173 patients were included in this analysis from 18 RCTs. Among those patients receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy, the incidences of all-grade and high-grade (grade 3 and above) anemia were 24% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-41%) and 4.0% (95% CI 3.0-6.0%), respectively. Bevacizumab-containing therapy did not significantly decreased the risk of developing all-grade anemia (RR 0.872, 95% CI 0.739-1.029, P = 0.104) and high-grade anemia (RR 0.850, 95% CI 0.720-1.002, P = 0.053), which is not in agreement with previous meta-analysis. On subgroup analysis, we did not find significant risk differences based on bevacizumab dosage, tumor types, and concomitant drugs. When stratified by dose level, a significantly decreased risk of high-grade anemia with bevacizumab was obtained in a lower dose level (2.5 mg/kg/week, RR 0.773, 95% CI 0.611-0.978, P = 0.031) compared to control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab did not significantly reduce the risk of anemia with chemotherapy in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25845654     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-015-1818-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  34 in total

1.  Results from AMBER, a randomized phase 2 study of bevacizumab and bortezomib versus bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Darrell White; Adetola Kassim; Birbal Bhaskar; Jing Yi; Karen Wamstad; Virginia E Paton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial comparing docetaxel and prednisone with or without bevacizumab in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CALGB 90401.

Authors:  William Kevin Kelly; Susan Halabi; Michael Carducci; Daniel George; John F Mahoney; Walter M Stadler; Michael Morris; Philip Kantoff; J Paul Monk; Ellen Kaplan; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab reduced the risk of anemia associated with chemotherapy-A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amna Sher; Shenhong Wu
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathy D Miller; Linnea I Chap; Frankie A Holmes; Melody A Cobleigh; P Kelly Marcom; Louis Fehrenbacher; Maura Dickler; Beth A Overmoyer; James D Reimann; Amy P Sing; Virginia Langmuir; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  David W Miles; Arlene Chan; Luc Y Dirix; Javier Cortés; Xavier Pivot; Piotr Tomczak; Thierry Delozier; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Louise Provencher; Fabio Puglisi; Nadia Harbeck; Guenther G Steger; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andrew M Wardley; Andreas Chlistalla; Gilles Romieu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Bevacizumab: in first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 7.  Measures of biosimilarity in monoclonal antibodies in oncology: the case of bevacizumab.

Authors:  Hans C Ebbers; Peter J K van Meer; Ellen H M Moors; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Hubert G M Leufkens; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 7.851

8.  Phase II study of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy or erlotinib compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of recurrent or refractory non small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Vincent J O'Neill; Louis Fehrenbacher; Chandra P Belani; Philip D Bonomi; Lowell Hart; Ostap Melnyk; David Ramies; Ming Lin; Alan Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Martin H Cohen; Joe Gootenberg; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-06

10.  Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III ARTIST trial.

Authors:  Zhong-Zhen Guan; Jian-Ming Xu; Rong-Cheng Luo; Feng-Yi Feng; Li-Wei Wang; Lin Shen; Shi-Ying Yu; Yi Ba; Jun Liang; Dong Wang; Shu-Kui Qin; Jie-Jun Wang; Jing He; Chuan Qi; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.