STUDY OBJECTIVE: The current outbreak of Ebola virus disease in West Africa is the largest on record and has overwhelmed the capacity of local health systems and the international community to provide sufficient isolation and treatment of all suspected cases. The goal of this study is to develop a clinical prediction model that can help clinicians risk-stratify patients with suspected Ebola virus disease in the context of such an epidemic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patient data collected during routine clinical care at the Bong County Ebola Treatment Unit in Liberia during its first 16 weeks of operation. The predictive power of 14 clinical and epidemiologic variables was measured against the primary outcome of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease, using logistic regression to develop a final prediction model. Bootstrap sampling was used to assess the internal validity of the model and estimate its performance in a simulated validation cohort. RESULTS: Ebola virus disease testing results were available for 382 (97%) of 395 patients admitted to the Ebola treatment unit during the study period. A total of 160 patients (42%) tested positive for Ebola virus disease. Logistic regression analysis identified 6 variables independently predictive of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease, including sick contact, diarrhea, loss of appetite, muscle pains, difficulty swallowing, and absence of abdominal pain. The Ebola Prediction Score, constructed with these 6 variables, had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.80) for the prediction of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease. Patients with higher Ebola Prediction Scores had higher likelihoods of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease. CONCLUSION: The Ebola Prediction Score can be used by clinicians as an adjunct to current Ebola virus disease case definitions to risk-stratify patients with suspected Ebola virus disease. Clinicians can use this new tool for the purpose of cohorting patients within the suspected-disease ward of an Ebola treatment unit or community-based isolation center to prevent nosocomial infection or as a triage tool when patient numbers overwhelm available capacity. Given the inherent limitations of clinical prediction models, however, a low-cost, point-of-care test that can rapidly and definitively exclude Ebola virus disease in patients should be a research priority.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The current outbreak of Ebola virus disease in West Africa is the largest on record and has overwhelmed the capacity of local health systems and the international community to provide sufficient isolation and treatment of all suspected cases. The goal of this study is to develop a clinical prediction model that can help clinicians risk-stratify patients with suspected Ebola virus disease in the context of such an epidemic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patient data collected during routine clinical care at the Bong County Ebola Treatment Unit in Liberia during its first 16 weeks of operation. The predictive power of 14 clinical and epidemiologic variables was measured against the primary outcome of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease, using logistic regression to develop a final prediction model. Bootstrap sampling was used to assess the internal validity of the model and estimate its performance in a simulated validation cohort. RESULTS:Ebola virus disease testing results were available for 382 (97%) of 395 patients admitted to the Ebola treatment unit during the study period. A total of 160 patients (42%) tested positive for Ebola virus disease. Logistic regression analysis identified 6 variables independently predictive of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease, including sick contact, diarrhea, loss of appetite, muscle pains, difficulty swallowing, and absence of abdominal pain. The Ebola Prediction Score, constructed with these 6 variables, had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.80) for the prediction of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease. Patients with higher Ebola Prediction Scores had higher likelihoods of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease. CONCLUSION: The Ebola Prediction Score can be used by clinicians as an adjunct to current Ebola virus disease case definitions to risk-stratify patients with suspected Ebola virus disease. Clinicians can use this new tool for the purpose of cohorting patients within the suspected-disease ward of an Ebola treatment unit or community-based isolation center to prevent nosocomial infection or as a triage tool when patient numbers overwhelm available capacity. Given the inherent limitations of clinical prediction models, however, a low-cost, point-of-care test that can rapidly and definitively exclude Ebola virus disease in patients should be a research priority.
Authors: Adam R Aluisio; Shiromi M Perera; Derrick Yam; Stephanie Garbern; Jillian L Peters; Logan Abel; Daniel K Cho; Stephen B Kennedy; Moses Massaquoi; Foday Sahr; Suzanne Brinkmann; Lindsey Locks; Tao Liu; Adam C Levine Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jillian L Peters; Daniel K Cho; Adam R Aluisio; Stephen B Kennedy; Moses B F Massaquoi; Foday Sahr; Shiromi M Perera; Adam C Levine Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Michael A Smit; Ian C Michelow; Justin Glavis-Bloom; Vanessa Wolfman; Adam C Levine Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Shevin T Jacob; Ian Crozier; William A Fischer; Angela Hewlett; Colleen S Kraft; Marc-Antoine de La Vega; Moses J Soka; Victoria Wahl; Anthony Griffiths; Laura Bollinger; Jens H Kuhn Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Javier Arranz; Karen Marie Lundeby; Shoaib Hassan; Luis Matías Zabala Fuentes; Pedro San José Garcés; Yngvar Lunde Haaskjold; Håkon Angell Bolkan; Kurt Østhuus Krogh; James Jongopi; Sindre Mellesmo; Ola Jøsendal; Åsmund Øpstad; Erling Svensen; Alfred Sandy Kamara; David P Roberts; Paul D Stamper; Paula Austin; Alfredo J Moosa; Dennis Marke; Åse Berg; Bjørn Blomberg; Melcior Riera Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Reshma Roshania; Michaela Mallow; Nelson Dunbar; David Mansary; Pranav Shetty; Taralyn Lyon; Kacey Pham; Matthew Abad; Erin Shedd; Anh-Minh A Tran; Sarah Cundy; Adam C Levine Journal: Glob Health Sci Pract Date: 2016-09-29