Literature DB >> 25844877

Risk attitudes in a changing environment: An evolutionary model of the fourfold pattern of risk preferences.

Dave E W Mallpress1, Tim W Fawcett1, Alasdair I Houston1, John M McNamara2.   

Abstract

A striking feature of human decision making is the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes, involving risk-averse behavior in situations of unlikely losses and likely gains, but risk-seeking behavior in response to likely losses and unlikely gains. Current theories to explain this pattern assume particular psychological processes to reproduce empirical observations, but do not address whether it is adaptive for the decision maker to respond to risk in this way. Here, drawing on insights from behavioral ecology, we build an evolutionary model of risk-sensitive behavior, to investigate whether particular types of environmental conditions could favor a fourfold pattern of risk attitudes. We consider an individual foraging in a changing environment, where energy is needed to prevent starvation and build up reserves for reproduction. The outcome, in terms of reproductive value (a rigorous measure of evolutionary success), of a one-off choice between a risky and a safe gain, or between a risky and a safe loss, determines the risk-sensitive behavior we should expect to see in this environment. Our results show that the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes may be adaptive in an environment in which conditions vary stochastically but are autocorrelated in time. In such an environment the current options provide information about the likely environmental conditions in the future, which affect the optimal pattern of risk sensitivity. Our model predicts that risk preferences should be both path dependent and affected by the decision maker's current state. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25844877     DOI: 10.1037/a0038970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  7 in total

1.  Framing the debate on human-like framing effects in bonobos and chimpanzees: a comment on Krupenye et al. (2015).

Authors:  Patricia Kanngiesser; Jan K Woike
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The adaptive value of probability distortion and risk-seeking in macaques' decision-making.

Authors:  A Nioche; N P Rougier; M Deffains; S Bourgeois-Gironde; S Ballesta; T Boraud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of risk preference is determined by reproduction dynamics, life history, and population size.

Authors:  Oren Kolodny; Caitlin Stern
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Network approach for decision making under risk-How do we choose among probabilistic options with the same expected value?

Authors:  Wei Pan; Yi-Shin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Macaques are risk-averse in a freely moving foraging task.

Authors:  Benjamin R Eisenreich; Benjamin Y Hayden; Jan Zimmermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Learning Reward Uncertainty in the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  John G Mikhael; Rafal Bogacz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Accuracy-Risk Trade-Off Due to Social Learning in Crowd-Sourced Financial Predictions.

Authors:  Dhaval Adjodah; Yan Leng; Shi Kai Chong; P M Krafft; Esteban Moro; Alex Pentland
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.524

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.