OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic incision (EI) for the treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures in pediatric patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients with refractory anastomotic strictures after surgical repair of esophageal atresia who underwent ≥3 sessions of endoscopic treatments (dilation and/or stenting). They were treated with EI alone or together with esophageal stenting. Efficacy and safety were evaluated during periodical follow-up. RESULTS: All of the 7 children received the procedure successfully with the operation time of 15 to 60 minutes. Four of them received EI alone, whereas the other 3 received EI with esophageal stenting (EIES). The symptoms remitted in all of the patients, and the dysphagia score decreased from 3-4 to 0-1 during follow-up from 1 to 21 months. The average diameter of stricture was enlarged from 3 mm (range 2-5 mm) to 10.6 mm (range 8-12 mm). One patient suffered from chest pain, which resolved within 3 days. Patient 1 had recurrence 11 months after EIES, and patient 6 had recurrence 3 months after EI. They all underwent an additional EI to maintain patency. No severe complications were observed during operation and periodical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: EI is safe and appears effective for refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures in children in the short term. Large comparative studies are warranted to further confirm our findings. The long-term follow-up is necessary for assessing the long-term efficacy of the new technique.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic incision (EI) for the treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures in pediatric patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients with refractory anastomotic strictures after surgical repair of esophageal atresia who underwent ≥3 sessions of endoscopic treatments (dilation and/or stenting). They were treated with EI alone or together with esophageal stenting. Efficacy and safety were evaluated during periodical follow-up. RESULTS: All of the 7 children received the procedure successfully with the operation time of 15 to 60 minutes. Four of them received EI alone, whereas the other 3 received EI with esophageal stenting (EIES). The symptoms remitted in all of the patients, and the dysphagia score decreased from 3-4 to 0-1 during follow-up from 1 to 21 months. The average diameter of stricture was enlarged from 3 mm (range 2-5 mm) to 10.6 mm (range 8-12 mm). One patient suffered from chest pain, which resolved within 3 days. Patient 1 had recurrence 11 months after EIES, and patient 6 had recurrence 3 months after EI. They all underwent an additional EI to maintain patency. No severe complications were observed during operation and periodical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: EI is safe and appears effective for refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures in children in the short term. Large comparative studies are warranted to further confirm our findings. The long-term follow-up is necessary for assessing the long-term efficacy of the new technique.