| Literature DB >> 25844534 |
Jessica L Maples1, Nathan T Carter1, Lauren R Few2, Cristina Crego3, Whitney L Gore3, Douglas B Samuel4, Rachel L Williamson1, Donald R Lynam4, Thomas A Widiger3, Kristian E Markon5, Robert F Krueger6, Joshua D Miller1.
Abstract
The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes an alternative model of personality disorders (PDs) in Section III, consisting in part of a pathological personality trait model. To date, the 220-item Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012) is the only extant self-report instrument explicitly developed to measure this pathological trait model. The present study used item response theory-based analyses in a large sample (n = 1,417) to investigate whether a reduced set of 100 items could be identified from the PID-5 that could measure the 25 traits and 5 domains. This reduced set of PID-5 items was then tested in a community sample of adults currently receiving psychological treatment (n = 109). Across a wide range of criterion variables including NEO PI-R domains and facets, DSM-5 Section II PD scores, and externalizing and internalizing outcomes, the correlational profiles of the original and reduced versions of the PID-5 were nearly identical (rICC = .995). These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that an abbreviated set of PID-5 items can be used to reliably, validly, and efficiently assess these personality disorder traits. The ability to assess the DSM-5 Section III traits using only 100 items has important implications in that it suggests these traits could still be measured in settings in which assessment-related resources (e.g., time, compensation) are limited. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25844534 DOI: 10.1037/pas0000120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Assess ISSN: 1040-3590