Leslea Peirson1, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis1, Katherine Morrison2, Rachel Warren1, Muhammad Usman Ali3, Parminder Raina3. 1. McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario ; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. 2. Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. 3. McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a public health concern. One-third of North American children and youth are overweight or obese. We reviewed the evidence of behavioural and pharmacological weight-management interventions on body mass index (BMI), BMI z-score and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and youth. METHODS: We updated the search of a previous review. We searched 4 databases up to August 2013. We included randomized trials of primary care-relevant behavioural (diet, exercise, lifestyle) and pharmacological (orlistat) interventions for treating overweight and obesity in children and youth aged 2-18 years if 6-month post-baseline data were provided for BMI, BMI z-score or prevalence of overweight and obesity. In addition, we examined secondary health outcomes such as lipid and glucose levels, blood pressure, quality of life and physical fitness. We included any study reporting harms. We performed meta-analyses when possible, and we examined the features of interventions that showed benefits. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies (29 behavioural, 2 pharmacological and behavioural) were included. Both intervention types showed a significant effect on BMI or BMI z-score in favour of treatment (behavioural: standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.73 to -0.36; orlistat plus behavioural: SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.25). Studies reported no significant difference between groups in the likelihood of reduced prevalence of overweight or overweight and obesity. Pooled estimates for blood pressure and quality of life showed significant benefits in favour of treatment (systolic blood pressure mean difference [MD] -3.42, 95% CI -6.65 to -0.29; diastolic blood pressure MD -3.39, 95% CI -5.17 to -1.60; quality of life MD 2.10, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.60). Gastrointestinal difficulties were more common in youth taking orlistat than in the control group (risk ratio 3.77, 95% CI 2.56 to 5.55). We saw much variability across efficacious interventions. INTERPRETATION: Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests behavioural treatments are associated with a medium effect in terms of reduced BMI or BMI z-score compared with a small effect shown by combined pharmacological-behavioural interventions. Future research should evaluate active weight maintenance interventions in adolescents with longer follow-up and examine the effectiveness of combined pharmacological and behavioural interventions. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD42012002754.
BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a public health concern. One-third of North American children and youth are overweight or obese. We reviewed the evidence of behavioural and pharmacological weight-management interventions on body mass index (BMI), BMI z-score and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and youth. METHODS: We updated the search of a previous review. We searched 4 databases up to August 2013. We included randomized trials of primary care-relevant behavioural (diet, exercise, lifestyle) and pharmacological (orlistat) interventions for treating overweight and obesity in children and youth aged 2-18 years if 6-month post-baseline data were provided for BMI, BMI z-score or prevalence of overweight and obesity. In addition, we examined secondary health outcomes such as lipid and glucose levels, blood pressure, quality of life and physical fitness. We included any study reporting harms. We performed meta-analyses when possible, and we examined the features of interventions that showed benefits. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies (29 behavioural, 2 pharmacological and behavioural) were included. Both intervention types showed a significant effect on BMI or BMI z-score in favour of treatment (behavioural: standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.73 to -0.36; orlistat plus behavioural: SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.25). Studies reported no significant difference between groups in the likelihood of reduced prevalence of overweight or overweight and obesity. Pooled estimates for blood pressure and quality of life showed significant benefits in favour of treatment (systolic blood pressure mean difference [MD] -3.42, 95% CI -6.65 to -0.29; diastolic blood pressure MD -3.39, 95% CI -5.17 to -1.60; quality of life MD 2.10, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.60). Gastrointestinal difficulties were more common in youth taking orlistat than in the control group (risk ratio 3.77, 95% CI 2.56 to 5.55). We saw much variability across efficacious interventions. INTERPRETATION: Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests behavioural treatments are associated with a medium effect in terms of reduced BMI or BMI z-score compared with a small effect shown by combined pharmacological-behavioural interventions. Future research should evaluate active weight maintenance interventions in adolescents with longer follow-up and examine the effectiveness of combined pharmacological and behavioural interventions. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD42012002754.
Authors: David M Janicke; Bethany J Sallinen; Michael G Perri; Lesley D Lutes; Janet H Silverstein; Babette Brumback Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Elsie M Taveras; Steven L Gortmaker; Katherine H Hohman; Christine M Horan; Ken P Kleinman; Kathleen Mitchell; Sarah Price; Lisa A Prosser; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-04-04
Authors: Maria Bryant; Amanda Farrin; Deborah Christie; Susan A Jebb; Ashley R Cooper; Mary Rudolf Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Melissa Wake; Louise A Baur; Bibi Gerner; Kay Gibbons; Lisa Gold; Jane Gunn; Penny Levickis; Zoë McCallum; Geraldine Naughton; Lena Sanci; Obioha C Ukoumunne Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-09-03
Authors: Melissa Wake; Kate Lycett; Susan A Clifford; Matthew A Sabin; Jane Gunn; Kay Gibbons; Cathy Hutton; Zoë McCallum; Sarah J Arnup; Gary Wittert Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-06-10
Authors: V Rainone; L Schneider; I Saulle; C Ricci; M Biasin; N M Al-Daghri; E Giani; G V Zuccotti; M Clerici; D Trabattoni Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Kelly A Wagner; Ethan Braun; Seth M Armah; Diarmuid Horan; Lisa G Smith; Julie Pike; Wanzhu Tu; Marc T Hamilton; Edward J Delp; Wayne W Campbell; Carol J Boushey; Tamara S Hannon; Nana Gletsu-Miller Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Yvonne G M Roebroek; Ali Talib; Jean W M Muris; Francois M H van Dielen; Nicole D Bouvy; L W Ernest van Heurn Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Oscar K Serrano; Yang Zhang; Emily Kintzer; Erin Moran-Atkin; Jenny Choi; W Scott Melvin; Diego R Camacho Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Raquel de Melo Boff; Ronald Patrick Araujo Liboni; Igor Pacheco de Azevedo Batista; Lauren Heineck de Souza; Margareth da Silva Oliveira Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.652