Literature DB >> 25843716

Artificial association of pre-stored information to generate a qualitatively new memory.

Noriaki Ohkawa1, Yoshito Saitoh1, Akinobu Suzuki1, Shuhei Tsujimura1, Emi Murayama1, Sakurako Kosugi1, Hirofumi Nishizono2, Mina Matsuo2, Yukari Takahashi3, Masashi Nagase3, Yae K Sugimura3, Ayako M Watabe4, Fusao Kato4, Kaoru Inokuchi5.   

Abstract

Memory is thought to be stored in the brain as an ensemble of cells activated during learning. Although optical stimulation of a cell ensemble triggers the retrieval of the corresponding memory, it is unclear how the association of information occurs at the cell ensemble level. Using optogenetic stimulation without any sensory input in mice, we found that an artificial association between stored, non-related contextual, and fear information was generated through the synchronous activation of distinct cell ensembles corresponding to the stored information. This artificial association shared characteristics with physiologically associated memories, such as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity and protein synthesis dependence. These findings suggest that the association of information is achieved through the synchronous activity of distinct cell ensembles. This mechanism may underlie memory updating by incorporating novel information into pre-existing networks to form qualitatively new memories.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25843716     DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  32 in total

Review 1.  Finding the engram.

Authors:  Sheena A Josselyn; Stefan Köhler; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Cell-Type-Specific Optogenetic Techniques Reveal Neural Circuits Crucial for Episodic Memories.

Authors:  Naoki Yamamoto; William D Marks; Takashi Kitamura
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Synaptic Targeting of Double-Projecting Ventral CA1 Hippocampal Neurons to the Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Amygdala.

Authors:  Woong Bin Kim; Jun-Hyeong Cho
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Functional and structural underpinnings of neuronal assembly formation in learning.

Authors:  Anthony Holtmaat; Pico Caroni
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Ventral Hippocampal Input to the Prelimbic Cortex Dissociates the Context from the Cue Association in Trace Fear Memory.

Authors:  Robert C Twining; Katie Lepak; Adam J Kirry; Marieke R Gilmartin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Autophagy Enhances Memory Erasure through Synaptic Destabilization.

Authors:  Mohammad Shehata; Kareem Abdou; Kiriko Choko; Mina Matsuo; Hirofumi Nishizono; Kaoru Inokuchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Memory allocation mechanisms underlie memory linking across time.

Authors:  M Sehgal; M Zhou; A Lavi; S Huang; Y Zhou; A J Silva
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Modulation of CA2 neuronal activity increases behavioral responses to fear conditioning in female mice.

Authors:  Georgia M Alexander; Natallia V Riddick; Katharine E McCann; Daniel Lustberg; Sheryl S Moy; Serena M Dudek
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 9.  Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future.

Authors:  Sheena A Josselyn; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The neurobiological foundation of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Paul W Frankland; Sheena A Josselyn; Stefan Köhler
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.