| Literature DB >> 25843386 |
Frank Ball1, Tom Britton2, Thomas House3, Valerie Isham4, Denis Mollison5, Lorenzo Pellis3, Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba6.
Abstract
This paper considers metapopulation models in the general sense, i.e. where the population is partitioned into sub-populations (groups, patches,...), irrespective of the biological interpretation they have, e.g. spatially segregated large sub-populations, small households or hosts themselves modelled as populations of pathogens. This framework has traditionally provided an attractive approach to incorporating more realistic contact structure into epidemic models, since it often preserves analytic tractability (in stochastic as well as deterministic models) but also captures the most salient structural inhomogeneity in contact patterns in many applied contexts. Despite the progress that has been made in both the theory and application of such metapopulation models, we present here several major challenges that remain for future work, focusing on models that, in contrast to agent-based ones, are amenable to mathematical analysis. The challenges range from clarifying the usefulness of systems of weakly-coupled large sub-populations in modelling the spread of specific diseases to developing a theory for endemic models with household structure. They include also developing inferential methods for data on the emerging phase of epidemics, extending metapopulation models to more complex forms of human social structure, developing metapopulation models to reflect spatial population structure, developing computationally efficient methods for calculating key epidemiological model quantities, and integrating within- and between-host dynamics in models.Entities:
Keywords: Households; Large sub-populations; Metapopulations
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25843386 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2014.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemics ISSN: 1878-0067 Impact factor: 4.396