Literature DB >> 25842191

3 dimensional cell cultures: a comparison between manually and automatically produced alginate beads.

R Lehmann1, C Gallert2, T Roddelkopf2, S Junginger3, A Wree4, K Thurow2.   

Abstract

Cancer diseases are a common problem of the population caused by age and increased harmful environmental influences. Herein, new therapeutic strategies and compound screenings are necessary. The regular 2D cultivation has to be replaced by three dimensional cell culturing (3D) for better simulation of in vivo conditions. The 3D cultivation with alginate matrix is an appropriate method for encapsulate cells to form cancer constructs. The automated manufacturing of alginate beads might be an ultimate method for large-scaled manufacturing constructs similar to cancer tissue. The aim of this study was the integration of full automated systems for the production, cultivation and screening of 3D cell cultures. We compared the automated methods with the regular manual processes. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of antibiotics on these 3D cell culture systems. The alginate beads were formed by automated and manual procedures. The automated steps were processes by the Biomek(®) Cell Workstation (celisca, Rostock, Germany). The proliferation and toxicity were manually and automatically evaluated at day 14 and 35 of cultivation. The results visualized an accumulation and expansion of cell aggregates over the period of incubation. However, the proliferation and toxicity were faintly and partly significantly decreased on day 35 compared to day 14. The comparison of the manual and automated methods displayed similar results. We conclude that the manual production process could be replaced by the automation. Using automation, 3D cell cultures can be produced in industrial scale and improve the drug development and screening to treat serious illnesses like cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D cell culturing; Alginate beads; Alginate matrix; Automated cell culturing; Cancer; Cervix carcinoma cells; Life science automation (LSA)

Year:  2015        PMID: 25842191      PMCID: PMC4960154          DOI: 10.1007/s10616-015-9861-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotechnology        ISSN: 0920-9069            Impact factor:   2.058


  32 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Lab automation and robotics: Automation on the move.

Authors:  Tim Chapman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The prophylactic use of antibiotics in cell culture.

Authors:  I Kuhlmann
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Antibiotics reduce the growth rate and differentiation of embryonic stem cell cultures.

Authors:  Shahar Cohen; Ali Samadikuchaksaraei; Julia M Polak; Anne E Bishop
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-07

5.  Lab automation: tales along the road to automation.

Authors:  Nathan Blow
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Microencapsulation of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm cells for tumor model studies.

Authors:  Anne M Rokstad; Björn I Gustafsson; Terje Espevik; Ingunn Bakke; Roswitha Pfragner; Bernhard Svejda; Irvin M Modlin; Mark Kidd
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Oxygen consumption, acidification and migration capacity of human primary osteoblasts within a three-dimensional tantalum scaffold.

Authors:  Anika Jonitz; Katrin Lochner; Tobias Lindner; Doris Hansmann; Annika Marrot; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds.

Authors:  Claudia Fischbach; Ruth Chen; Takuya Matsumoto; Tobias Schmelzle; Joan S Brugge; Peter J Polverini; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Alginate-encapsulated HepG2 cells in a fluidized bed bioreactor maintain function in human liver failure plasma.

Authors:  Sam M Coward; Cécile Legallais; Bertrand David; Michael Thomas; Ying Foo; Demetra Mavri-Damelin; Humphrey J Hodgson; Clare Selden
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.094

10.  Cancer cell angiogenic capability is regulated by 3D culture and integrin engagement.

Authors:  Claudia Fischbach; Hyun Joon Kong; Susan X Hsiong; Marta B Evangelista; Will Yuen; David J Mooney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Variable Scheduling Maintenance Culture Platform for Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Koji Ochiai; Naohiro Motozawa; Motoki Terada; Takaaki Horinouchi; Tomohiro Masuda; Taku Kudo; Motohisa Kamei; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Kenji Matsukuma; Tohru Natsume; Genki N Kanda; Masayo Takahashi; Koichi Takahashi
Journal:  SLAS Technol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.047

2.  Alginate-based 3D cancer cell culture for therapeutic response modeling.

Authors:  Farideh Davoudi; Samar Ghorbanpoor; Satoshi Yoda; Xiao Pan; Giovanna Stein Crowther; Xunqin Yin; Ellen Murchie; Aaron N Hata; Henning Willers; Cyril H Benes
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.