Literature DB >> 25842027

Five- to ten-year follow-up with a partially cemented all-polyethylene bone-ingrowth glenoid component.

Matthew P Noyes1, Bradley Meccia2, Edwin E Spencer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although total shoulder arthroplasty has demonstrated better clinical outcomes than hemiarthroplasty, glenoid component loosening is a common complication. Recently, a novel partially cemented all-polyethylene fluted central peg bone-ingrowth component was introduced.
METHODS: Forty-two consecutive total shoulder arthroplasties from 2003 to 2007 performed by a single surgeon were evaluated radiographically and clinically with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and range of motion.
RESULTS: The average follow-up was 80 months (63-114); the average forward elevation improved from 107° to 137°, and external rotation improved from 30° to 37° at the latest follow-up. The average ASES score improved from 50 to 84. There was a strong correlation with the mean peripheral peg lucent line score (Lazarus score), which was 0.81, with the mean anchor peg lucent line score, which was 0.50 (P < .001). An analysis of polyethylene before and after cross-linking revealed a strong correlation between components with cross-linking and the Lazarus scores and the central fluted peg scores. Overall, there was 97% survivorship at 80 months. On radiographs, 81% of the central fluted pegs had complete incorporation with no lucent lines. These lucent lines correlated with lower ASES scores, suggesting that loosening of the glenoid decreases functional outcome.
CONCLUSION: Care should be taken in preparing the central fluted peg as perforation of the vault can lead to central flute peg lucent line formation, whereas perforation of the peripheral pegs does not seem to negatively affect the outcome.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; bone ingrowth; cement; glenoid; peg; polyethylene; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25842027     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Brenda Chang; Joseph T Nguyen; David M Dines; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with a partially cemented all-polyethylene pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid component: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Lazaros Kostretzis; Ioannis Gkiatas; Efstathios Chronopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-27

4.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of Asymmetric Reaming versus a Posteriorly Augmented Component for Posterior Glenoid Wear and Retroversion: A Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Kevin Ko; Usman Ali Syed; Jonathan D Barlow; Scott Paxton; Bryan J Loeffler; Ocean Thakar; Grant Jamgochian; Joseph A Abboud; Charles L Getz; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

6.  Glenoid vault perforation in total shoulder arthroplasty: Do we need computer guidance?

Authors:  Jennifer N Flynn; Malin Wijeratna; Matthew Evans; Steven Lee; David McD Taylor; Gregory A Hoy
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-11-20

7.  Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Bong-Jae Jun; Yuxuan Jin; Jason C Ho; Thomas E Patterson; Jarrod E Dalton; Kathleen A Derwin; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.558

8.  Comparison of press-fit versus peripherally cemented hybrid glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  J Brett Goodloe; Kirsi S Oldenburg; Sarah Toner; Justin M Rabinowitz; William R Barfield; Josef K Eichinger; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-10-29

9.  Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Fahad Alabdullatif; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Minimum 5-year outcomes of pegged versus keeled all-polyethylene glenoids.

Authors:  Samuel G Moulton; Elliott W Cole; Reuben Gobezie; Anthony A Romeo; Evan Lederman; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-11-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.